Advertisement

Fisker Karma: Range Extended Electric Car Ultimate Guide Page 2

Follow Antony

2012 Fisker Karma EcoSport

2012 Fisker Karma EcoSport

Enlarge Photo

Fisker financials, failures, fires and furloughs

There's no hiding that Fisker has had one or two problems. It started with problems acquiring DoE loans, continued when Fisker got sued, and has taken a nasty turn with inquries over a fire involving one of the cars. Those issues have sadly continued over the last year or so, with poor reviews from Consumer Reports, and the destruction of several Karmas in the wake of Hurricane Sandy.

Worse still, Fisker appears to be on its last legs. With production stalled following battery supplier A123's bankruptcy, Henrik Fisker's departure from the company bearing his name and the redundancies of most of the workforce, the Fisker Karma might not be long for this world.

You can see further detailed reports in The Car Connection's 'Fisker, An Influential Disaster' and Motor Authority's 'Fisker Automotive: The Final Flameout'.

Financials...

Fires...

Furloughs, failures, finality?


Advertisement
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (3)
  1. Why would anyone buy a Karma when they could buy a Tesla that would save you so much more and most likely cheaper than $100,000? Now I could not afford either car and that is why I bought a C-Max Energi. On a recent trip of 471 miles that took me over the Coast Range in Oregon and back I got 54 mpg! And that was probably 75% on the gas engine at 60 mph along I-84 and probably an average mph of 50 on Oregon route 6.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

     
  2. For a science teacher in Washington state, it is a sad day that he doesn't understand the difference between MPG and MPGe...

    No wonder our kids are failing in the world of science.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. "75% on the gas engine"

    So your extended range MPG is really only 54*0.75 = 40.5mpg. BARELY matches EPA rating and below EPA's hwy rating!!!!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion? Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Advertisement

Get FREE Dealer Quotes

From dealers near you
Go!

Find Green Cars

Go!

Advertisement

 
© 2014 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by izmo, Inc.
Advertisement