Advertisement

2012 Fisker Karma Gets Good News From Germany: 50 Miles Of Range. Yes, But...

 
Follow Nikki

2012 Fisker Karma

2012 Fisker Karma

Enlarge Photo

Fisker Automotive might be suffering a lot of pressure after its luxury plug-in hybrid was rated as having an all-electric range of just 32 miles by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) -- but the automaker is now claiming it has independent results to prove the EPA was wrong. 

In a public statement posted on Fisker’s website, the automaker has said that Europe’s regulatory body for fuel efficiency, the German-based Technischer Ueberwachungs Verein (TUV) has carried out independent tests to confirm that the range-extended electric car can travel 51.6 miles in all-electric mode. 

Calling it the “most thorough tests yet of the Karma’s real-world urban performance”, Fisker is obviously much happier with the official TUV tests than it is with the EPA ratings, which it had previously said did not “communicate the entire story

But before we go any further, it is important to note that any type of fuel tests, regardless of them being carried out by the EPA or another organization, do not truly reflect real-world driving experiences. 

Worse still, the ECE R 101 European test cycle used to obtain the 51.6 mile all-electric range for the Fisker Karma is the same test cycle which rated the 2012 Chevrolet Volt -- or Opel Ampera as it’s known in Europe -- as having an all-electric range of 50 miles.

2012 Fisker Karma

2012 Fisker Karma

Enlarge Photo

In the U.S., the EPA rates the Volt as having an all-electric range of 35 miles. 

What does that tell us? Does the Fisker Karma have a better range than the EPA says? 

In reality, we think the EPA rating is a more accurate figure for U.S. consumers, while the European rating is probably better suited to European driving. 

With completely different traffic patterns and driving styles on both continents, it makes no sense to relate the rating of a car in one country to its rating in another without making appropriate adjustments. 

However, official ratings are for guidance only: they don’t represent fuel efficiency for every given situation.  It is entirely possible that some U.S. consumers will find that their 2012 Fisker Karmas can easily do 51 miles per charge without using gasoline, while others will struggle to get more than 25 miles. 

As with any fuel economy figures, your mileage may -- and will -- vary. 

+++++++++++

Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.



Advertisement
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (6)
  1. So how does the EPA or the Euros handle the Fisker's "Performance
    Mode"?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. Karma's front grill reminds me a bit of Jack Nicholson as the Joker in Batman.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. I think in this situation, you really do get what you pay for. If Karma and Volt keeps looking around, I am sure they will be able to eventually find someone they can pay enough to say that both of them can get 100 MPC. Both Fisker and GM should only build ICE cars and never enter the EV arena. They are both getting their asses kicked all over the place. After what Karma just did, I think they can count the American market out.
     
    Post Reply
    -1
    Bad stuff?

     
  4. Ah, yes, the king of the hypocrites strikes again... If GM doesn't build EVs, you rip them. Then when they do, you rip them anyway. Luckily, both companies are quite capable of making decisions from someone so ignorant he still claims that EVs should be cheaper than ICE vehicles. I still love laughing at that one!
    And GM is doing quite fine, thank you. I know how much you hate it when American companies are profitable. Oh, that's right, in your buffoonish world, GM is a Chinese company, as you've stated repeatedly.
    BTW, James, I didn't see any comments from you on the article that mentions the Volt outselling the LEAF in October.
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

     
  5. That sounds like a bought and paid for remark. You must work for GM as one of those loyal anti-environmental conservatives.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

     
  6. Gentlemen: We appreciate both of your contributions to the lively comments here on Green Car Reports. However, let me inject a gentle reminder that we prefer to keep those comments to the merits of the various topics--and ask their authors to refrain from personal insults and attacks ...
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion? Join the conversation!

Advertisement

Find Green Cars

Go!
Advertisement

Advertisement

 
© 2014 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC.