
2012 Fisker Karma during road test, Los Angeles, Feb 2012
Volt-Style Battery Nightmare Before Christmas...
What Now For Fisker Karma Owners: Are V-8s...
2012 Fisker Karma: Brief Drive Report
After four years, an economic crisis, an industry meltdown, and plug-in cars becoming politically problematic, the 2012 Fisker Karma is on the streets at last.
And it's a real car. We've driven it, shot video behind the wheel, and now we've formally reviewed it.
We're still sorting out what we think about the Karma, an extended-range electric luxury sport sedan that starts at $106,000.
Sexy, sexy, sexy
It's undoubtedly the sexiest, most noticeable car we've driven in years--more so even than the electric Rolls-Royce Phantom we tested.
But it's also a car about the size of a BMW 7-Series sedan with so little interior space that it's defined as a subcompact by the U.S. government.
It's neither a superlative sport sedan nor a particularly efficient electric car.
MORE: 2012 Fisker Karma - Full Review
In fact, running on battery power, it gets only half the distance per kilowatt-hour delivered by the Chevy Volt, the only other range-extended electric car on the market this year.
And the cars we've driven had some disturbing quality issues, from teething troubles like displays that froze and went dark to panel alignment issues and body gaps that wouldn't have been acceptable on the cheapest Korean import 15 years ago.
So we wonder, will sleek, sexy lines and a six-figure price really let Fisker sell the 15,000 cars per year it says it's planning to build?
Can company survive?
Then there's the bigger question: Can the company survive?
The U.S. Department of Energy has frozen all further disbursements of low-interest loan funding to Fisker because it missed deadlines and volume projections for the Karma.
As a result, Fisker laid off some workers and suspended development of its next vehicle line, the "Project Nina" mass-market lineup that was to be built in a former GM plant in Wilmington, Delaware.
No more DoE loans, analyst says
Theodore O'Neill, an analyst at Wunderlich Securities, told the Boston Globe that he thinks the Obama Administration won't renegotiate the DoE loan terms.
Post-Solyndra, the entire concept of extending loans to venture-funded startup companies may be politically toxic, and the White House is under pressure to reduce spending.
If the DoE loans don't come through, O'Neill said he thinks Fisker will collapse--possibly taking A123 Systems, the lithium-ion cell maker, with it.
Founder Fisker not worried
A remarkably insouciant Henrik Fisker disagrees with the predictions of doom.

Henrik Fisker, CEO & founder, Fisker Automotive, at 2012 Fisker Karma event, Los Angeles, Feb 2012
Enlarge PhotoIn an interview on Friday, he hedged his bets and said the company was working hard to develop alternative funding sources from the private sector as well.
Last month, Fisker Automotive doubled the size of its Series D funding round to $300 million, of which $243 million is now committed, bringing total private money invested to $866 million--not including the DoE loans.
Fisker Automotive has already spent $100 million of its own (non-DoE) capital funds on development work for Project Nina, its second car, which is the vehicle for which the bulk of the DoE funds were designated, Fisker said.
Working toward self-sufficiency
But the prospect for DoE loans is "not going to get much better this year," since it's an election year, Fisker said.
"We're not dependent on the DoE, we didn't want to be dependent on the DoE, so we're working harder to become self-sufficient," he said--meaning selling enough Karmas globally to cover the development costs of Project Nina internally.
We'll post our complete interview with Fisker soon.
Name the last one
We get asked a lot about the future of Fisker Automotive, and also Tesla Motors. They're high-profile auto startups of a quality and professionalism not seen in decades.
But we always answer the questions with a query of our own: What's the last auto company founded from scratch in the U.S. by entrepreneurs whose brand is still with us today?
The answer is Chrysler.
And that was 88 years ago.
No one's managed to do it since. Many have tried--Preston Tucker, Henry J. Kaiser, Malcolm Bricklin, John Delorean, and more--but none have succeeded.
So what makes you think that Fisker, or Tesla, will succeed?
Leave us your own thoughts in the Comments below.
+++++++++++
Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.
Have an opinion?
Their low battery cost in combination with succeeding to come up with the vehicle concepts the market really seems to be going for makes Tesla's position very strong. If Musk manages to deliver on his promise to get cars in the hands of customers by this summer and 5000 more out by the end of the year I think Tesla is here to stay.
As you point out, starting a new company is VERY hard, and Tesla's survival is not guaranteed. But they are building something superlative--electric range completely unlike anything you can buy anywhere else. Plus exceptional space in the S and X (too bad the Roadster didn't have that). I think Tesla has a good chance.
The other half of luxury cars is comfort, room, smooth quiet, loaded with fancy features and impeccable fit and finish. I think the only thing on this list provided by the Karma is comfort, so Fisker is not going after this half of the market.
Musk is a lot more than a programmer, he has learned a lot about running companies. Tesla has, under his direction, behaved a lot more like a mature auto company than a specialty shop. They built and rigoursly tested 20 Roadster prototypes, changed design (transmission) and supplier (original carbon fiber pannel maker was not up to quality). Tesla has hired many auto experts from Detroit.
Fisker has spent his career in the auto industry and knows what he is doing. However I do not have the same confidence with Fisker surviving as Tesla, but it is much too early to tell.
I don't agree with your emphasis on a time deadline. Tesla is best served by getting the car right before releasing, and delays although undesirable are much better than a bad reputation.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!