Luxury Hybrid Maker Fisker Automotive Raises...
2011 Fisker Karma Plug-In Hybrid: Sales Now To...
Fisker Automotive Raising $200 Million At $2.2...
Electric cars like the 2011 Chevrolet Volt and 2011 Fisker Karma get around the problem of range anxiety the old-fashioned way: They use gasoline engines.
They do it because the battery systems of pure electric vehicles are large, heavy, and expensive, but the range they produce is still ...limited.
A series hybrid, like the Volt or Karma, makes do with a smaller battery system that keep the vehicle totally clean for almost all typical daily commuting, but still offers full normal range via the secondary, range-extending gasoline engine.
By 2014, we should see such series hybrids using gasoline or diesel engines, even turbines, designed solely to generate electric current.
These purpose-built range extending powerplants will be both very clean and much more efficient than what we see now in the introductory, "version 1.0" models of the Chevy Volt and Fisker Karma.
Off-the-shelf engines
Both cars are very special forms of hybrid cars, meaning they have two types of powertrain. The more technical description is a series hybrid (where the gas engine does NOT drive the wheels) as compared to a parallel hybrid (e.g. 2011Toyota Prius, 2011 Hyundai, Sonata Hybrid, 2011 Ford Fusion hybrid), the better-known form of a hybrid.
Perhaps the most glaring weakness in the 2011 Chevy Volt is the mundane design of its gasoline engine. After around 40 miles, the 2011 Chevrolet Volt's battery has reached its discharge limit and the gasoline engine takes over as the "range extender."
General Motors specifically calls the Volt an "extended range electrical vehicle," or EREV, and the Fisker Karma uses a similar format with a larger initial battery capacity that it claims gives more like 50 miles of clean electrical operating range.
The 2011 Karma has a more powerful 2.0 liter, 260-hp turbocharged gasoline powerplant compared to the 74-horsepower, 1.4-liter engine in the 2011 Volt. Both gasoline engines were sourced from standard General Motors items, and neither was specially designed to power a generator.
Design weaknesses
The 2011 Chevrolet Volt's "off the shelf" gasoline engine was early to market, but it's currently not refined enough to meet the strict emissions standards of the California Air Resources Board for full "clean vehicle operation."
GM has said that the 2012 Volt will have a more polished gasoline engine and thus meet these more demanding standards. In not meeting these more rigorous emission standards, the Volt does not qualify for either the California $5,000 clean vehicle rebate, the electric vehicle parking permit, or a freeway single-occupant carpool lane permit.
Future, Application Specific Range Extender Engines-
Lotus Engineering has announced the development of a new engine designed especially for range extending applications. This very compact 1.2-liter three-cylinder engine with an integrated generator holds the promise of being both lighter and cleaner than the current "off the shelf" options used in the 2011 Volt and 2011 Karma.
Lotus reports "several companies" are in negotiations to license this design for future electric drivetrain applications. Other engine designs are possible as well, including rotary or Wankel engines. Michigan State University Engineering Faculty have been working on a new twist on what might be called a rotary engine.
Funded by a $2.5 million federal grant, the engineers at MSU are now proceeding to scale up their prototype work solely to act as a range extender engine for electric vehicle applications.This "wave rotor" design holds the promise of high energy output, very clean combustion, and and amazingly light and compact format.
+++++++++++
Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.
Have an opinion?
I would agree with your projections on the Fisker's fuel "economy." I cannot see how that kind of motor could do much better than "mid 20's" on mpg. It certainly didn't do that in the Solstice or Sky, BUT running at more steady state would allow it to perform NEAR optimally.
@Chris,
But, the Volt is at most $20K more than a comparably equipped Cruze, and the Tesla S, when equipped with the 300 mile range battery pack, is $20K more than the base Tesla S, so it seems to me that the range extender engineering is currently NO MORE than trying to get that kind of range with battery technology AND the range extender allows use of the more established infrastructure and quicker refueling for those longer trips.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!