
2012 Fisker Karma outside Tesla Motors dealership during test drive, Los Angeles, Feb 2012
Enlarge Photo
2012 Fisker Karma: Brief Drive Report
What Now For Fisker Karma Owners: Are V-8s...
2012 Fisker Karma Plug-In Is Real, But Will...
First off, just to be clear, the photo above is NOT a dead Fisker.
It shows the 2012 Fisker Karma we road-tested three weeks ago parked at a Tesla Motors dealer in Los Angeles.
But while our Fisker was running fine that day, Consumer Reports was not so lucky this week.
The magazine bought a Fisker Karma at a dealership to test it--we can only drool with envy over their budgets--only to have it die midway through their first day of testing during a routine highway speed test.
Yes, the writeup used the inevitable pun: Bad Karma. [sigh]
It's quite rare these days, though not unheard-of, for an expensive luxury performance car to be hauled away from a road test on a flatbed truck.
But it's worrisome. Sufficiently so, in fact, that Jalopnik published a reader photo it received last week of a maroon Fisker Karma parked at curbside in Southern California with its hood up and the driver on his phone--indicating that it too had some kind of mechanical problem.
(The mystery driver doesn't appear to be Fisker owner Justin Bieber, whose car is black.)
Granted, the Fisker Karma may get more attention for its sleek lines than virtually any other car we've driven recently. So these may be isolated incidents that get noticed only because it's a Fisker.
On the other hand, the company will say only that it's delivered a few hundred Karmas--which means the universe of cars that can fail is very, very small.
And we get a queasy feeling about the level of development and quality assurance in the Fisker Karma overall.
Over the course of our several experiences in Fiskers--we've driven it, shot video behind the wheel, driven it again, and formally reviewed it--we only had one glitch, although it was worrisome.
During our brief New York City test drive, the Karma's instrument cluster simply went blank. To fix it, we had to park the car, turn it off, and wait five minutes for it to "go to sleep." Once we restarted, the cluster rebooted itself and we could drive off--a problem Fisker said it fixed in a subsequent software upgrade.
Fisker staff put a good face on such issues--one that we're not sure is justified.
"We rely on our early customers to identify issues like this for us," Russell Datz, Fisker's director of corporate communications, said cheerfully at the time.
Equally troublesome, among the Fiskers tested by colleagues three weeks ago, the simple act of plugging an iPhone into the USB port crashed the display monitor on the console. The company says there will be a software update coming for that one, too.
And on every Fisker we've seen, wide panel gaps yawn between the fenders and trunklid, a rubber seal bulges out of the gap between the curvaceous rear door and the adjacent fender, and the arches of the front fender and the hood edge that abuts it don't quite match.
That's not only sub-par for a $106,000 luxury vehicle, it's significant worse than any mass-market Toyota, Chevy, or Volkswagen you can buy for $20,000 today.
Quality is a very real worry for the fate of the undeniably sexy Karma, and perhaps for the larger plug-in car industry. We have to ask: Given the suspension of its DoE loans since last spring, can Fisker survive?
As for the photo above, we swung by the local Tesla dealership during our Karma road test and shot it just for fun.
The image was subsequently used for a "Caption This" contest on Facebook by our sister site, MotorAuthority. It got several hundred entries.
We'll be announcing the winner later today. Meanwhile, in light of Fisker's travails, how would YOU caption the photo?
Leave us your thoughts in the Comments below.
+++++++++++
Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.
Have an opinion?
However, it looks like Voelcker was finally motivated to write about his concerns after publicity of the Consumer Report's experience.
As for Fisker's bad experience tainting the wider EV community, you raise a good point. Perhaps the LEAF and the Volt won't be lumped into the same mental image of the Karma in consumer's minds. But given all the bad press the Volt has (undeservedly) had recently, perhaps they will be.
As for Tesla's quality, I agree with you on that.
Even the lowly Buick LaCrosse mild hybrid can sit for a year or two without a charge and not completely die.
Supporing Tesla overall doesn't mean pretending that they didn't screw up when they did. It's a relatively small issue but one that there's also no excuse for it making into a production vehicle, either.
Fix the design issue, don't just tell your customers to read a manual, especially when EVs are relatively new and your competitors don't seem to have the same problem. Didn't you write the same thing?
Why? Because there is a full infrastructure supporting the Volt... and the car is very well vetted because of the resources of GM and shared parts with other cars (like Cruze).
A startup is OK in software... but not in a car. Better to wait at this point.
http://www.thecarconnection.com/overview/fisker_karma_2012
Will trade my Karma for a Modes S! Deal?
But my question, as an ex-auto OEM project mgr, is; do the tires rub on the fenders when turning into a sloped driveway? or coming out of a sloped parking structure over slight curb into the street. Fisker is a designer and was not going to let anyone "compromise" his design. I personally do not see enough clearance for the tires in any sort of turning and bumping situation. Maybe this is why the fenders don't fit. I can not beleive they leave the factory that way?
That's not only sub-par for a $106,000 luxury vehicle, it's significant worse than any mass-market Toyota, Chevy, or Volkswagen you can buy for $20,000 today."
So in other words, it's like a 1980s GM. The kind of car Honda and Toyota nearly put into oblivion.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!