Irate Investor Sues Fisker: A Little Lesson In...
What Now For Fisker Karma Owners: Are V-8s...
2012 Fisker Karma: Brief Drive Report
While Fisker's new CEO may be getting headlines today, the company continues to grapple with fallout from Friday's fire in a 2012 Fisker Karma.
Over the weekend, Fisker had issued a statement saying it was investigating the incident.
Yesterday, the company issued a further statement.
In the release, Fisker said that its investigations have determined the fire did not start in the car's lithium-ion battery pack or its electric-drive components, or due to the car's exhaust routing.
In fact, Fisker said, the fire's origin appears to its investigators to have been outside the engine compartment altogether, forward of the left front tire.
The statement from Fisker Automotive reads as follows:
ANAHEIM, CA -- August 13, 2012: Fisker engineers, working with independent investigators from Pacific Rim Investigative Group, have begun preliminary examination and testing on the Karma involved in a fire in Woodside, California Friday, August 10.
Evidence revealed thus far supports the fact that the ignition source was not the Lithium-ion battery pack, new technology components or unique exhaust routing.
The area of origin for the fire was determined to be outside the engine compartment. There was no damage to the passenger compartment and there were no injuries.
Continued investigative efforts will be primarily focused within the specific area of origin, located forward of the driver’s side front tire.
Further details will be announced after a full report is completed.
The Friday fire was the second time one of only 1,000 or so Fisker Karma range-extended electric luxury sedans has been damaged or destroyed by a blaze that appears to have started in the car itself.
No doubt there will be further releases from Fisker on the cause of the fire.
If you want to judge for yourself--and you know your way around photos of fire-damaged cars--GreenTech Media published several post-fire photos of the Fisker that burned.
It's worth noting that there are more than 250,000 fires each year the U.S. population of about 250 million vehicles.
Fisker's rate of two fires in 1,000 vehicles (0.2 percent) thus far is roughly double the national car-fire rate of 0.1 percent.
And those Fiskers have only been on the road for a year, versus the average age of the U.S. vehicle population, which is now more than 10 years.
With such a small population of cars, our comparison is almost surely statistically invalid.
Nonetheless, we doubt it's cause for much confidence among current Fisker Karma owners.
+++++++++++
Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.
Have an opinion?
Doesn't really matter what it was, the car does seem to have ignited itself.
Given the risks, that would be truly awful engineering.
Now this fire appears to have started high as the tire has very little damage. I suspect from the poor quality pictures a wiring harness fire in something feeding through the fender and catching the body panel on fire.
According to the Eric Wesoff report: "He (Mr. Burger) said that the car was smoking when he pulled it into the parking lot where the fire proceeded to melt the front left side of the vehicle body".
I wonder what really happened, especially since the Texas fire isn't explained yet either and the Fisker research team emphatically mentioned the possibility of foul play for some reason.
Of course cheap government loans for disruptive energy related technology are bound to make a lot of vested interests very unhappy and after Solyndra they seem to be focussing on Fisker to make it the next showcase to definitively kill off that program (that has long since ground to a halt BTW)and to prove the government shouldn't interfere in the market ever again like that. Bet they are pretty pleased with these fires.
Not saying friction heating was the source in this case… just a possibility until we know more of the facts.
Or it could the owner really hating the car and try to set it on fire to collect insurance money...
Second, when the car caught on fire, the owner called Fisker rather than the fire department. Why would you call the manufacturer.
However, it might just be the "fog" of communications and the story makes more sense some how.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/automaker-fisker-recalls-2-400-201637169.html
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!