Advertisement

Aptera Shutting Down For Good

 
Follow Marty

Aptera 2e

Aptera has just released a statement, saying it will shut down operations today.

As recently as two years ago, the southern California-based Aptera had plans to introduce an electric car and to sell up to 10,000 copies a year. It had even hoped to received approval for some of the same federal loans that have helped along other electric-car projects such as the Chevy Volt, Nissan Leaf, Ford Focus Electric, Tesla Model S and Fisker Project Nina. It spoke of plans to build a new plant near San Diego.

But the Aptera story, and all its mildly fascinating and majorly improbable visions, really began in 2010. That's when Aptera began letting journalists experience its 2e, a weirdly styled three-wheeler that ran on battery power. Aptera promised 100 miles of range from the vehicle's electric powertrain, and began taking deposits for delivery sometime in 2011.

Then it stopped taking deposits for the biologically themed 2e in July. In August, the company said that it would return deposits to potential buyers due to what it described as credit-card transaction problems. Three weeks ago, the company insisted on its Web site that a vehicle was coming--but mysteriously had removed mention of the 2e from its Web site.

Optimistically--but possibly, more revealingly--a spokesperson said then that the web site would soon showcase "a better reflection of how our business is developing."

This afternoon, Aptera sent out an email to the media confirming that it would shut down. It explained in the letter that its other plans for electric-car greatness had taken too much time, and had come in underfunded.

In the letter, Aptera president Paul Wilbur says his company's application for low-interest loans from the Department of Energy had made it as far as a "conditional commitment letter" for a $150 million loan. That money was to be devoted to a five-seat mid-size sedan. However, Aptera says it was unable to find matching funds to equal those in the conditional letter--though it does not address how it would have funded the development, procurement, assembly construction and other major facets of such a plan even on a potential $360 million budget.

In another interesting detail revealed in the letter, Aptera's plan would have placed operations not in San Diego, but instead in the middle of the Rust Belt. Aptera's plan for DOE dollars centered around revamping an existing plant in Moraine, Ohio--a plant that was bundled in "old GM" assets spun off during General Motors' bankruptcy. The plant had formerly assembled SUVs like the Chevrolet TrailBlazer, and was the subject of an HBO short documentary entitled The Last Truck. The plant is also located in one of the few states that election analysts say are critical to the upcoming 2012 Presidential campaign.

Aptera's operations, including the stillborn 2e, cease immediately, according to the official letter below:


 

After years of focused effort to bring our products to the market, Aptera Motors is closing its doors, effective today.  This is a difficult time for everyone connected with our company because we have never been closer to realizing our vision.  Unfortunately, though, we are out of resources.

It is especially disappointing since we were so close…

Aptera executives had been engaged in exhaustive due diligence with the Department of Energy (DOE) pertaining to an ATVM (Advance Technology Vehicle Manufacturing) loan.  Our business plan was examined from top to bottom by internal agency representatives, independent consultants and experts in academia.  They did an amazing job of vetting us and they tested every possible weakness in our plan.  And after nearly two years of discussions, we had recently received a Conditional Commitment Letter for a $150 million loan.  

The ATVM loan would have provided funding for the development and commercialization of a five-passenger, midsized sedan (similar to a Toyota Camry) that would be base priced at less than $30,000 and deliver more than a 190 mile per gallon equivalent.  The concept of this vehicle had been in place since the very beginning of Aptera, and we had been wholly focused on its development for the last year.  The last remaining hurdle was finding new funds to match the DOE loan.

We were so optimistic that the company would move forward that we were in discussions to reactivate a mothballed automotive plant in Moraine, Ohio.  In the past months we had engaged with the labor union that operated that facility to discuss the hiring of 1,400 new job opportunities. These jobs would have reactivated talented workers who had been dismissed when the facility was closed.  

During the same time, we continued development of our patent-pending composite manufacturing system that enables energy efficient vehicle production by drastically reducing vehicle weight (by as much as 30%) while tripling its strength.    This same patent pending system allowed us to finish the surface of our composites without manual finishing and without the high capital cost of a typical automotive paint shop.  In all, the process would save nearly $750-million versus a typical volume auto assembly plant start-up.

We were well on the way to satisfying the vision of efficiency on which the company was founded and we are confident that with time and capital we could still achieve our goal.  The Aptera formula: aerodynamics plus light weight design (through composites) delivered efficiency of 206 EPA miles per gallon in tests at Argonne National Labs.  That wasn’t a simulation; it was real measured performance.  Despite that promise of efficiency, this challenged market – specifically large private investors – did not have an appetite to lead an investment for the perceived low volume return of our three-wheeled vehicle.  So we reprioritized our product plan to four-door sedans, which also cost us time.

We remain confident, even as this chapter closes, that Aptera has contributed tech new technologies to build a future for more efficient driving.   Through the dedicated staff at Aptera, our board and suppliers we have touched this future. All that remains is for someone to grab it.  We still believe it will happen.  

Paul Wilbur
President and CEO
Aptera Motors



Posted in:
Advertisement
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (20)
  1. Although we all knew this was coming, it's still sad to hear. My company did a fair amount of work with Aptera and found their people knowledgeable, professional and easy to work with. I know many will make the usual snide comments, but despite the disappointing ending, I hope everyone there ends up on his/her feet.
     
    Post Reply
    +2
    Bad stuff?

  2. I am a little sad to see the end of Aptera, but not too surprised. What does come as a complete surprise to me is that they had long since given up on the iconic 3 wheeled vehicle in favor of a "Camry". I guess dramatic change in the world of automobiles is too much to ask for.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

     
  3. Personally I think the weird electric three wheeler never made any sense as a concept. If you're willing to throw out all practicality for the sake of efficiency you might just gone for a small ICE to power it. It would have gotten 100MPG or so which would have made the added value of an expensive electric drivetrain pretty much non existent. Still, I completely agree with the sentiment that the failure of a well meaning upstart is a sad thing.
     
    Post Reply
    0
    Bad stuff?

     
  4. Curious why you think they "threw out all practicality for the sake of efficiency." I think the Aptera 3-wheel was very practical but just unfamiliar.
     
    Post Reply
    0
    Bad stuff?

     
  5. A cramped two-seater with no luggage space to speak of...
     
    Post Reply
    0
    Bad stuff?

     
  6. Room for two 250lb men without shoulders touching and room for two golf bags or surfboards or six carry-on luggage bags doesn't fit your description. Have you even looked at the Aptera?
    +1
    Bad stuff?

  7. Agree that any two-seater is a little impractical. However, as others have said, there is a lot of storage space in the back of the Aptera.

    I can get to work in my Prius, by bicycle, or by subway. I think that somewhere in that continuum of transport options is a space for something like the Aptera. But I guess the point is moot now anyway.
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  8. Well John, to get to work the Aptera is all anybody needs I guess but most people look for more utility than that in a car. Still it's too bad Aptera couldn't make it work for those with a lifestyle that mostly just involves themselves and the odd golf bag.

    I still wonder if fitting it with an 100MPG+ ICE could have put it at a price point that would have made it a viable market proposition. But like you said, that's all moot now.
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  9. There are more comments in this thread
  10. What's so odd about 3 wheels? No one freaks out about 2 wheels, a motorcycle, but you add an extra wheel and you're impractical... It's very similar to the thinking of people who don't understand electric. It doesn't go vroom-vroom so it can't be a car.
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

     
  11. Never said it was the three wheels that make it impractical. The three wheels concept just means it would have had very little mainstream appeal. It's the two-seater concept and the limited luggage space(unless two golfbags is all you ever have move; it all depends on your lifestyle of course...)that makes it impractical, thus further limiting it's market appeal.
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

     
  12. I could be wrong but it doesn't look like you can roll the windows down, and that's the point your trying to make rite. Because of it's unique design it lacked certain practical things that are found in modern mainstream cars. Yes it's design had a purpose, but if you can't do something like go through a bank drive-through because your window doesn't go down, thats impractical.
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  13. I just hope that no one uses this news to say anything negative about electric cars. I had always been concerned about Aptera, it's one thing to introduce a new type of drivetrain but to the put it into a new type of body style I think only made things harder for Aptera. People are just warming up to EVs now is not the time to introduce one that looks like an escape pod from the Death Star. Still it is very sad when someone's vision for the future dies and although this has happened before I am very sad to hear that Aptera's vision will not be realized.
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

  14. As much as Paul Wilbur would like everyone to believe that the original design somehow was to blame for this, he's wrong. This is just him trying to spin his failure. He's a liar. And he's lying in this statement. There was no Conditional Commitment Letter. Here is the article: http://gigaom.com/cleantech/aptera-did-not-receive-a-doe-150m-conditional-loan-commitment/
    Aptera's failure is completely because of Paul Wilbur and his cronies and not because the design was flawed in some way.
     
    Post Reply
    +2
    Bad stuff?

     
  15. 100 MPG PLEASE , it was supposed to be 200 to 300 MPG when it all started. Then they got on the band wagon of electric with 100 miles till recharge. Then again at the beginning it was rear drive , then switched to front. If they could of stayed on ONE concept it would of been a hit. Start small and grow is the wise plane , having a waiting list is better then NO car at all.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  16. Criminal Actions charged against: Dept. Of Energy, Former White House Staff, Goldman Sachs & Associated Parties. After over 5 years of investigation, documents and charges are about to be released which will demonstrate a criminal manipulation of public money and process by a group of associated parties who illegally rerouted money, stocks and positions of value for personal gain. Those parties are shown in the attached chart, the actions of which will be deeply detailed in forthcoming releases. Those parties include: Staff of the U.S. Department of Energy, former White House staff, Goldman Sachs, a group of venture capitalists, Detroit auto companies and participants at specific technology companies. The manipulations of money exceed many
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

     
  17. @Linda: I have disabled the six (6!) successive pieces of this post. We welcome comments on all our articles from anyone with something to say, but it has to be relevant to the article it's posted on. Not one of your seven posts had anything to say about Aptera.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion? Join the conversation!

Advertisement

Find Green Cars

Go!
Advertisement

Advertisement

 
© 2014 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC.