2013 Nissan Leaf: Longer Range, Faster...
2013 Nissan Leaf: Driven Through Tennessee...
2013 Nissan Leaf: Spy Shots Of New...
The 2013 Nissan Leaf that will go on sale in January will be a slightly different car from the 2011 and 2012 models sold in the U.S. so far.
We already know the electric car will offer leather seats and a 6.6-kilowatt charger as options, along with a more efficient heating system.
Now a report from Japan suggests that Nissan will offer a 2013 Leaf with longer range, as well as a lower-cost model with a smaller battery pack (which could be restricted to sales in that country).
The improvement in usable range is attributed to improved performance from the battery's lithium-ion cells and a more efficient electric motor.
Today's Leaf is rated by the EPA at 73 miles of range. Owners report usable range of 60 to 90 miles in real-world use, depending on their speed, the outside temperature, and how much they use air-conditioning and/or heater.
A report in SankeiBiz, a Japanese newspaper, says the new Leaf model will offer more than 250 km (155 miles) of range--though that figure is undoubtedly based on the Japanese test cycle, which produces figures far more optimistic than the U.S. EPA tests do.
The current Leaf is rated on that same Japanese cycle at 200 km (124 miles) of range.
But the 25-percent improvement discussed in the news report could bring the U.S. range rating of the 2013 Nissan Leaf to something like 90 or 91 miles.
If so, that would put the 2013 Leaf ahead of the Ford Focus Electric (76 miles), Honda Fit EV (82 miles), and Coda Sedan (88 miles) in rated range.
The less expensive 2013 Leaf with lower range may be limited to buyers in Japan, which has different tax subsidies and buyer incentives. Mitsubishi already sells a lower-range model of its i-MiEV electric minicar there.
The Sankei report also says that Nissan will "dramatically change the appearance" of the Leaf's design. In fact, we suspect the changes will be evolutionary updates rather than a completely new style.
Colin Lawther, Nissan's VP of engineering for Europe, said in April that when U.K. production of the 2013 Leaf starts early next year, it will have its styling "fine-tuned" to the tastes of European buyers.
Sankei reports that the changes to the Leaf were pulled forward a year, due to lower-than-expected global sales of the Leaf. Nissan Leaf sales in the U.S. have been flat this year, for a variety of reasons, as explained by the company's VP of sales.
The 2013 model will have to produce far higher sales to justify Nissan's investment in Leaf assembly--and construction of a lithium-ion cell fabrication plant--in its factory in Smyrna, Tennessee.
U.S. assembly of the Leaf and its battery cells was funded, in part, by a $1.6 billion low-interest loan from the U.S. Department of Energy. In the end, Nissan used only $1.4 billion of those loan proceeds.
Changes for the 2013 Leaf were predicted by Nissan executive Mark Perry as far back as 2010, well before the first Leaf was sold in December of that year.
+++++++++++
Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.
Have an opinion?
"it will have its styling "fine-tuned" to the tastes of European buyers." Is that code for saying it needs to be less fugly.
So hurry up and sell me one!
Nissan will likely keep the price exactly the same, which is sort of like reducing the price as inflation goes up a couple percent, and point out the lower long term lower operation costs of EVs in general. Carpool too
Well, most of the European/Japanese market aren't that hot. Even most the US states aren't that hot. Maybe Nissan is taking a "lazy" approach to the problem when 90% of its market aren't hot enough to have battery capacity issues...
There are many different approaches to making batteries. You can make them cheap, and save money not using fancy liquid heating/cooling. Nissan was very up front about this. Nissan also refused to warranty battery performance.
Chevy chose to use higher quality batteries and add thermal management. Then they went the extra step of limiting the initial use to 70% of the battery with this moving upward as the battery ages so the battery degradation will not be apparent to the user. Chevy warrants 80% range at 8 years. Volt costs more.
They want Volt warranty at LEAF $.
@Roy- I think people did believe Nissans statements of battery degradation. It's just that the statements made quoted 20% loss after 5 yrs or 30% loss after 10 yrs.
Many owners in hot climates see a reduction in capacity of more than 20% after 1 year. That is quite different from what Nissan PR had told them: 20% after 5 years. It's Nissan's own responsibility for setting these expectations. It is normal for these people to have trusted Nissan and it is fully understandable they feel misled.
I agree with your points. Since Leaf doesn't have Engine or the gas related components and complexity, why can't owners expect the Volt Warranty at Leaf's price? Don't you think if Nissan is truly "fully committed" to EVs, then it would have done it right.
Tesla and Focus EV also manage the battery carfully...
as far the battery heat issues; Nissan is in a tough place. despite their warnings about degradation what we have now is people in one area that have caused great anxiety for people in nearly every part of the country. i know people with 25,000 miles on their cars with nearly negligible degradation who are just as upset as people with 14,000 miles and 20% degradation.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!