Advertisement

This Monstrosity Will Be Your Next Electric-Car Charging Plug

Follow John

Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) J-1772 "combo" electric-car charging plug

Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) J-1772 "combo" electric-car charging plug

Enlarge Photo

It's almost the size of a misshapen softball, but it may be the charging combo you will have to use for quick charging on future electric cars.

The U.S. Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) is in the process of expanding its J-1772 standard for an electric-car coupler from the current round plug-and-socket fitting that is now used on every electric cars sold in the U.S. except for the Tesla Roadster.

The goal is to add a standard for higher-voltage DC quick charging, allowing a single socket and plug to be used for anything from 110-Volt AC charging at 15 Amperes all the way up to a high-voltage standard sufficient to recharge 80 percent of an electric car's battery pack in 30 minutes.

Eaton CHAdeMO DC quick charging station, Mitsubishi headquarters, Cypress, CA

Eaton CHAdeMO DC quick charging station, Mitsubishi headquarters, Cypress, CA

Enlarge Photo

There is, of course, already an existing standard that does exactly that: the Japanese CHAdeMO quick-charge standard, already offered on the Nissan Leaf (the very popular option for 2011 will be standard on the SL trim level for 2012) and soon the 2012 Mitsubishi 'i' as well.

While there's only a single working CHAdeMO charging station in the U.S. at the moment, in Portland, more than 130 have already been installed in Japan and hundreds more are on the way.

Why not simply adopt the CHAdeMO standard, to prevent a VHS vs. BetaMax standoff? The problem, it appears, is that North American automakers don't like the idea of two separate charging ports (one for J-1772, one for CHAdeMO). They want a single, integrated coupler.

Well, the Nissan Leaf has a single door in the nose that covers its two separate sockets. And as you can see from the photo, the proposed SAE standard is essentially two plugs and sockets welded into single Frankenstein-like contraptions.

Equally as important as the coupler itself are the communications protocols behind it, which the SAE is developing jointly with the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). The professional society defines numerous standards for electrical equipment.

Scenes from dedication of electric-car charging station at Creekside Inn, Palo Alto, CA

Scenes from dedication of electric-car charging station at Creekside Inn, Palo Alto, CA

Enlarge Photo

And, to be fair, those communications protocols build on the existing J-1772 code and messaging, rather than using an entirely different digital "language" as the CHAdeMO standard does.

The SAE hopes to finalize and issue the standard in the first quarter of 2012.

Thus, it appears that the photo above shows the socket you'll get if you buy an electric car in North America in coming model years, and the plug you will have to use if you want to quick-charge.

Elegant, ain't it?

[Automotive Engineering]

+++++++++++

Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.

Advertisement
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (21)
  1. It's a plug,OK. Finally, without any assistance from our brainless Feds, we will have an inclusive plug standard. Fortunately, the number of EVs affected will be tiny, as only early, early adopters are on the road. The idea of two or more plugs is totally absurd in this day and age. The whole idea is to make charging as simple and foolproof as possible, both for the manufacturers as well as the driver. This is indeed very good news and deserves more than a simple hooray. Congratulations to the standards committee for sticking to their guns and doing it right and not be sidetracked by silly issues. The last thing the EV movement needs is confusion over something as basic as plugs
    and sockets. EV proponents haven't done a good job on this.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

     
  2. This is more harm than good. Instead of adopting an existing standard we are going to pay a lot of money to make a new one and even more to retrofit existing stations ending up with THREE plugs because CHAdeMO will stay and everyone EXCEPT the U.S. will be using it. Worse some stations may only support one or the other... THAT is brainless. It is insulting to suggest people are so stupid that they cannot distinguish which is the right port, especially if they own the car. I mean right now we have to choose between diesel and unleaded fuel and we get by just fine. It would have been nice to have a universal plug (think what USB did for computers) but that ship has sailed. It should have been in the original J-1772 standard.
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

  3. It looks like face-saving to me.
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

  4. Hi John,
    As a Mini-E driver I think you have it a bit wrong, that "this will be the cord you get" I can't imagine my wife weilding this plug everynight as we plug in our car.
    What will happen is that this will become the standard "charge port" that will be in every car after the adoption of the standard. The home owner will continue to use the slimmer level one or level two J1772 charger to plug in.
    Only the fast chage level three stations will use this beefy plug to deliver the high octane DC current to this universal dock.
    Cheers Peder
    Mini-E # 183, 32,000 sunshine powered miles.
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

  5. John Voelcker,

    This combo plug would only be used on a DC fast-charger, not on all charging stations as your article implies. Level-2 EVSEs would still use the current J-1772 connector.

    I hope the Nissan LEAF can be retrofitted or an adapter made to allow DC fast-charging with the new standard.
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

     
  6. @Peder @Keith Thanks for your comments. You're right, of course; it's the socket that'll be standard, and not necessarily the plug. I've tweaked the wording in the piece a little more to reflect that distinction. Appreciate your input.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

     
  7. John, This statement "sufficient to recharge 80 percent of an electric car's battery pack in 30 minutes" doesn't mean anything unless you add a pack size - better still, just quote the power the charger can handle (in kW)... tho I appreciate that might be a bit techy for most readers. Regards, MW.
     
    Post Reply
    +2
    Bad stuff?

  8. The outlet looks like it may still accept the standard J-1772. There is definitely going to be a need for the automotive accessories industry to make transformers ect.
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

     
  9. Transformers? Oh, my five year old will really love that, especially Jolt.
     
    Post Reply
    0
    Bad stuff?

     
  10. I meant transformer as in a plug transformer, duh. This in not an entertainment site.
     
    Post Reply
    -1
    Bad stuff?

  11. Perhaps the article's comments were not meant to be as negative as I read them to be. I'm not negative on the J1772 Combo coupler. A couple of points:
    J1772 Level 2 can handle 15 to 80Amps.. so there is upside for 240V Level2 EVSE to charge up to 19.2kW (240V x 80A) in future premises/EVSEs/PEVs. For eREVs/PHEVs, an 80A @ 240V 19.2kW ac level 2 charge rate is plenty fast.. it will charge a Volt nearly as fast as a ChaDeMo on a Leaf. (20-30 minutes).

    So, I think the Combo J1772 will be used in limited applications for DC fast charging of Fleets, and maybe in some paid public charging stations. And yes, the OEMs would seem to not like the much larger doors that 2 connectors require.
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

  12. Here's an idea. Save thousands of $, prevent the wastage of 100's of thousands more and just use the Chademo standard. Is there anything wrong with it? If not and if it isn't going to be prohibitively expensive to licence it from Japan why re-invent the wheel?
     
    Post Reply
    +2
    Bad stuff?

  13. I had the good luck to be able to use the Vacaville L3 charger back in February.

    Most people, I would venture a guess, have never actually seen the CHAdeMO plug and charger much less used one. I suspect I am one of the very few who have, as a private driver, actually used this technology. Yes, it works, and I don't fully see why it is necessary to "reinvent the wheel," BUT talk about clunky and heavy.

    The CHAdeMO handle is much more bulky and clearly from my experience harder to use than this SAE design. I have been a strong critic of the SAE perceived need to develop their own design, but clearly the SAE design would be both easier to use and allow for a single smaller plug opening/port area on the side of the vehicle.
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

  14. Too Harsh. I would argue that the LEAF approach is worse. The two connectors on the LEAF take up much more room than the one J-1772 combo connector. To my eye, the J-1772 combo is about the same size as the CHAdeMO connector.

    I will reiterate what others have said, you will NOT use this combo cable very often, if at all.

    Personally, I like it. Well, at least I like it compared to the LEAF approach to the problem. Over the long term, we will be better off. Charge forward SAE.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  15. Actually, maybe I was too harsh. Thanks for the update on the J-1772 connector. Great information.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  16. Maybe this is at least part of the reason there is only 1 L3 charging station in the US? SAE has been at this for awhile and who wanted to invest in infrastructure pending the outcome?

    Question is, what do the Japanese makers do now? Offer different ports for US cars, or switch over to the SAE standard? Or, fight on with CHAdeMO?

    Too bad this couldn't have been settled a few years ago.
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

  17. They better have a good reason for this. EVs have been delayed long enough without the sae whining about a perfectly good plug.
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

     
  18. Dear SAE
    Just when folks forget GM's attempt to destroy competition we have the FrankenPlug. 6 decades ago GM (& Firestone) bought up all the electric trollys for the purpose of selling buses. After all, you buy all the trollys and CRUSH them - the public has to ride on GM buses with Firestone tires. Wind forward to the 90's and the early 2000's and GM is at it again trying to destroy the future ah la crushing EV1's. Now GM works to crush the re-introduction of EV's ah la FrankenPlug. The goal is simple. At worst GM/SAE hopes to make the 1st 10,000 new EV's with a REAL working standard, completely incompatible with the non-existent U.S. EV plugs. FrankenPlug; you're kidding. Hey GM: Work on LOAN paybacks & leave working EV's alone! Jerks
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

  19. What in the world is the SAE thinking and the IEEE! Why can't we just adopt the standard all ready. So what if it came from Japan. Once again, making the standards change again, and again and again! Avcon paddle plugs, J1772 plugs, and now a Frankenstein Plug! How to we rise up and complain! These people are total jerks.
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

  20. Having used the chademo connector, the j1772 version looks a lot simpler: you just plug it in instead of push this, pull that, shove it in, pull this, push that.
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

     
  21. Wonder if you were plugging in the cable or involved in a different activity.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion? Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Advertisement

Get FREE Dealer Quotes

From dealers near you
Go!

Find Green Cars

Go!

Advertisement

 
© 2014 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by izmo, Inc.
Advertisement