Start-Up Electric Car Company Green Vehicles Folds, Costs City $500,000

 
Follow Nelson

Green Vehicles Triac 2.0

Green Vehicles Triac 2.0

Enlarge Photo

Consider today's collapse of electric car company Green Vehicles an object lesson in why it's a bad idea for cities to invest in the risky business of start-up car companies--perhaps especially start-up electric car companies. The city of Salinas, California learned that lesson today as Green Vehicles shut its doors, costing the city more than $500,000.

Starting any company is a risky proposal--most don't make it past their first few years. Starting an electric car company can be even riskier, as governmental regulation of the car industry sets an expensive barrier to entry, and the nascent technologies in electric car development are costly and can shift direction quickly.

Green Vehicles was working on a three-wheeled electric car called the Triac 2.0, intended as a freeway-capable commuter car with a range of 100 miles and a top speed of 80 mph. It used a 30kW permanent-magnet electric motor, and a lithium-ion battery pack. It was targeting retail prices near $25,000. Another vehicle, called the MOOSE, was a utility van-type vehicle built as a neighborhood electric vehicle (NEV).

Though the company's web page is still operational, there is no notice about the company's current situation. According to local ABC news affiliate KSBW, Green Vehicles president and co-founder Mike Ryan has said all of the company's funding is gone. He reportedly notified city officials that the company was finished via email.

Green Vehicles had promised it would create 70 new jobs and tax revenue of $700,000 per year.

[KSBW, Wikia, Green Vehicles]





 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (4)
  1. Why am I not surprised? Poor Salinas.
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

  2. See what happens when you don't have a democratic govt? These bozo morons running Salinas gave this fly-by-night would-be EV car maker an initial $300K of taxpayer money (didn't ask anyone's permission) then they showed just how incredibly dumb they were by forking over another $200K. Don't these boobs have a clue as to how much money is required just to pay the Feds to do their crash tests? Did they really believe that $500K is going to produce an automaker? GM spends that much just to design a wheel. Salinas needs to recall their officials and rewrite their laws that prevent this kind of bizarre behavior in the future. Better yet, require a referendum on any expenditures over $1000. Their officials can't be trusted (not so unusual)
     
    Post Reply
    -1
    Bad stuff?

     
  3. Their primary product was a 3 wheeled vehicle, so it is classified as a motorcycle. It doesn't require federal crash testing. Really it sounds like they were not able to get an addition round of required funding and because of that folded. Their little cars sounds like a pretty cool option for something small and less expensive than a full blown GM volt or Nissan Leaf
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. Consumer reports likes the Nissan Leaf. It obviously meets all government safety regulations and is on the American market now. $500,000 would have bought 12 of those cars and a big bank of solar panels and inverter to charge those cars' batteries.
    misterfact@yahoo.com
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Find Green Cars

Go!


 
© 2011 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC.