2013 Nissan Leaf: Driven Through Tennessee...
2013 Nissan Leaf: Spy Shots Of New...
2013 Nissan Leaf: Longer Range, Faster...
It's the last piece of information on the new and updated 2013 Nissan Leaf electric car that everyone's been waiting for: its range.
The projected number, Nissan says, is 75 miles--but that shouldn't be compared to the 73-mile range of the 2011 and 2012 Leaf models.
That's because the EPA changed the test procedures it uses to calculates range for electric cars for the 2013 model year.
Before this year, the range estimate assumed a battery pack that was charged to 100 percent of its capacity.
Many electric cars--the Nissan Leaf and Tesla Model S among them--offer owners the ability to limit charge to 80 percent of capacity.
While this reduces range, it also prolongs battery life and takes disproportionately less time, since the final 20 percent of a battery pack tops off at a slower rate.
The EPA's new testing procedure averages the ranges achieved from an 80-percent charge (known as Long-Life Mode charging) and a 100-percent charge (called Long-Distance Mode charging).
For the 2013 Nissan Leaf, the maker estimates those ranges to be 66 miles and 84 miles respectively.
So comparing last year's apples to this year's gives a range improvement of 15 percent, from 73 to 84 miles--even though that's not what will appear on the window sticker.
The improvement in apples-to-apples range is largely due, Nissan says, to improvements in the Leaf's regenerative braking, reduced aerodynamic drag, and a slightly lower vehicle weight.
So, the range of the 2013 Nissan Leaf is either 66 miles or 84 miles, or a number somewhere in between--depending on how you charge the car.
The default charging on new 2013 Nissan Leaf electric cars is set to Long-Distance Mode, though owners can easily reset that default to Long-Life Mode.
Nissan notes that regardless of charging mode, its battery capacity warranty--added in December after a few high-mileage Leafs in very hot Phoenix lost notable battery capacity--guarantees that at least 70 percent of battery capacity will remain after five years or 60,000 miles.
To give the battery its best shot at longest life, however, owners may elect to charge only to 80 percent when they don't expect to travel more than 60 miles in a day--especially in the temperate climates where there's no winter weather to reduce range below projections.
The official EPA range ratings should be released by early March, Nissan says.
Meanwhile, it's permitted to put the projected range rating(s) on the window stickers of the 2013 Leafs now being built in Tennessee and shipped out to dealerships all over the U.S.
Prices for the 2013 Nissan Leaf start at $28,800 for the base Leaf S model, rising to $34,840 for the SL model, plus a mandatory $850 destination fee on all models.
The Nissan Leaf qualifies for a $7,500 Federal income-tax credit for the purchase of a plug-in car, as well as various other types of state, regional, local, and corporate incentives.
Nissan hopes the lower prices and improved range, performance, and equipment level will boost Leaf sales in 2013 from their previous levels between 9,000 and 10,000 a year in 2011 and 2012.
We've long said, "Your mileage may vary"--will we now begin saying, "Your range may vary"?
Most likely.
How do you feel about the 2013 Leaf's projected range of 84 miles (at 100 percent charging)? Was it the increase you expected?
Leave us your thoughts in the Comments below.
+++++++++++
Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.
Have an opinion?
2012 FFE 76 miles 2013 FFE 76 miles
2012 iMiEV 63 miles 2013 iMiEV 62 miles
Is Nissan Leaf discriminated here?
Yes, IMHO the LEAF is being discriminated against. The range is 84 miles.
One the one hand, kudos to Nissan for getting an 11 mile range improvement. I've had situations where that extra 11 miles would have made a big difference, so for that and the 6.6 kW charger, I'm looking forward to upgrading when my lease is up in 2014.
On the other hand, EPA needs to re-think its method. Averaging two different charge states is meaningless to the user. They should report the 100% charged range and let users take 80% of that if they want to know the long-life range.
Hyundai just flubbed the tests I think...
Toyota? Why Toyota?
Why stop there? Why don't we list the range by temperature (F)? 104 degree, 77 degree, 50 degree, 23 degree, -4 degree? Those would be "real world" numbers...
I imagine that the average consumer doesn't necessarily worry themselves with "long-life mode".
But anyway - why does the RAV4-EV use the "average" range while the Model S uses the "range-mode" range? Shouldn't the EPA be consistent here?
It's understandable that EPA wants consumers to have a more accurate picture of the range but that's influenced by many factors besides SOC like temperature, speed and battery wear. So maybe every EV makers should be obliged to publish tables of range estimates covering a wide range of parameters to give consumers proper insight in what to expect. In fact with so many parameters involved it should probably be a computer app.
I expect and hope for an additional 30% range improvement when the Leaf is redesigned in 2015/16. That would put the second gen Leaf at about 110 mile range. Maybe even a range of 150+ miles will happen.....
2013 LEAF
City Range: 84 miles = 21.75 kWh / 25.9 kWh/100 miles * 100 (for 130 MPGe)
Highway Range: 66 miles = 21.75 kWh / 33.0 kWh/100 miles * 100 (for 102 MPGe)
Combined Range: 75 miles = 21.75 kWh / 29.0 kWh/100 miles * 100 (for 116 MPGe)
EPA Rating: 116, 130, 102 MPGe Combined/City/Highway
Consumption**: 29.0, 25.9, 33.0 kWh/100 mile
Consumption**: kWh/100 miles = 33.7kWh/gal / __ MPGe
EPA Gallon = 33.7 kWh/gal
City Range: 68 miles (31.8 kWh/100 miles for 106 MPGe)
Highway Range: 59 miles (36.6 kWh/100 miles for 92 MPGe)
Combined Range: 64 miles (34.0 kWh/100 miles for 99 MPGe)
Consumption**: kWh/100 miles = 33.7kWh/gal / __ MPGe
Range: miles = 21.75 kWh / __ kWh/100 miles * 100 (80% would be 17.4 kWh)
EPA gallon of gas is stated as: 33.7 kWh/gal for MPGe
Thanks for the breadown. It is "shocking" to see the huge improvement in city numbers between 130 and 106. I guess the "better regen" really made that much difference... I kind of "doubt" that regen can make that much difference.
The HWY difference is probably due to the better aerodynamic.
In addition to electric updates to charger (both 3.6 & 6.6 kWH), other components like the inverter had minor updates. Somewhat speculation on my part as changes to packaging are obvious, but have not seen schematics, nor component details inside of units.
Looking at city vs. highway test graphs provides insight into speeds & amount of stop/go for each EPA test cycle.
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/fe_test_schedules.shtml
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/evsbs.shtml
2013 data is from: http://NissanUSA.com/LEAF
EPA data all EV data:
2012: see page 27 of http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/pdfs/guides/FEG2012.pdf
2013: see page 26 of
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/pdfs/guides/FEG2013.pdf
Graphs for EPA's Detailed Test procedures; showing speeds & drive cycles:
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/fe_test_schedules.shtml
This 'method' of rating the battery is actually discouraging auto makers from including an 80% charge mode. Include the 80% charge mode and your 100% and 80% range will be averaged. Don't include the mode and your 100% range is used?
This is worse the EPA test not factoring in the engine shut-off technology. Beneficial to consumers, beneficial to real world results, looks bad on paper.
It looks to me like the real-world range of the 2013 will be very close to the same as the 2011-2012.
"… improvements in the Leaf's regenerative braking, reduced aerodynamic drag, and a slightly lower vehicle weight." Not enough to make much difference in ordinary driving.
Tom
Observations: The 2013 car did substantially the same range as the 2013 car tested on Feb 22, 2013. The 2012 car performed very similarly to the 2012 car used as an comparison example in the Feb 22, 2013 test.
Conclusion: Two separate 2013 LEAF's have failed to exceed the range of either 2012 LEAF tested, and may actually have less range in these parameters.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!