A question of balance
It's important to eliminate bias when analysing results such as these.
A survey by BMW on a BMW-built electric car on a BMW-run trial is likely neither to criticize the vehicle too heavily, nor put the car into any situation where it might struggle to cope with an owner's usage. With some big-budget electric BMWs in the pipeline, there's commercial interest in the vehicle appearing fit for purpose.
At the same time, you can argue that it
was the perfect test, because at this stage, nobody is likely to buy an electric car if it doesn't suit their needs, so the people who do "go EV" already know they can live with one. Some car owners do huge distances every year and need a large car for their families and paraphernalia, and they're obviously not going to choose an EV for the task. Many drivers just do short distances though and many others are part of two or more car families, and in both cases an EV may be perfect. If your daily commute is 25 miles then an EV with a 100-mile range offers far
more than you need.
We're discovering that EV buyers tend to be a well-educated bunch and as such, we don't see anyone accidentally buying an EV to find out that it doesn't meet their needs. In this respect, BMW's test could be considered quite realistic.
The important thing is to understand that for many people, an EV still isn't a suitable method of transport for reasons of cost or because their longer journeys are regular enough to make it inconvenient. BMW's test results are very positive for EV ownership and as an example of how well EVs can work to the wider public, but we can't scorn those for whom EV ownership still isn't a realistic option.
One of the most telling figures of the test? Despite loving the MINI E, 55 percent of the testers said they'd wait another few years before buying an electric car. BMW isn't quite there yet - could the i3 turn the tide?
[BMW]
Have an opinion?
What most surprises me about the study is how much people actually enjoyed the Mini E EV driving experience. Yes, I'm an EVangelist, but when I test drove one at the AltCar Expo I found the regenerative breaking a bit too stiff for my own tastes...not smooth like the LEAF.
make many itinararies impossible if dealing with less than 100 miles. 100 miles is not very far in many locales. Many in California and here as well, have two way commutes way over 100 miles. And then there's
always the possibility of a detour.... EVs such as these are obviously only as very, very expensive second cars. And those "gas savings" are likely to more than disappear when buy-a-new-battery-pack time comes along. Claiming inexpensive operation and not mentioning battery replacement costs is total fraud, in my book.
Agreed, all costs must be considered. The more you evaluate all costs, the better the argument is for EV's. Brakes for example. I have 63,000 miles on my MINI-E and still have the original brake pads. At 63,000 miles all I've needed is a few tire replacements and wiper blades. My fuel savings is close to $5k at this point and by 100,000 miles it will be around $8,000. Couple that with no oil changes, no tune ups, no rotting muffler & exhaust to replace, let alone timing belts, fuel pumps and the hundreds of self-destructing parts that make up an ice and I'll be way, way ahead when it comes time for a new battery. Your FUD is getting old
More importantly, do you know how much gas will cost in 2019 ? Do you even know whether there will be enough gas for everyone ?
If Telsa brought their EV price down to the family budget, you would never have to buy another car for decades or probably not even a battery.
Wow, that means 19% of the EV drivers prefer to go to a gas station instead of filling up at the convenience of their own home.... Unbelievable!
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!