2012 Tesla Model S: Seven Little Things A Buyer...
Tesla Model S 'Get Amped' Tour: 5,000 Test...
Buying A 2012 Tesla Model S: Pros & Cons Of...
Last October, at the official launch of the 2012 Tesla Model S, we told you about Tesla’s plans to build a network of “Superchargers”: fast-charging stations that could add up to 150 miles of range to a Model S in 30 minutes.
Yesterday, Tesla Motors [NSDQ:TSLA] launched its Supercharger network at an exclusive event at the company’s Hawthorne, California design studio.
Designed to provide up to 100 kilowatts of power, with a future capability of up to 120 kW, Tesla’s Superchargers are about twice as powerful as the Chademo rapid charging standard found on cars like the 2012 Nissan Leaf and 2012 Mitsubishi i.
Twice the power means roughly twice the range for the same amount of time spent recharging.
But while Tesla's Supercharger system has the potential to change the public perception of electric car-travel, it is proprietary to Tesla.
Today, only drivers of a 2012 Tesla Model S with an 85-kilowatt-hour battery pack can make use of the super-fast charging stations.
By the end of the year, Tesla says it will start building Model S versions with a 60-kWh pack; buyers of those cars can specify the Supercharger capability as an option.
Future Tesla models, including the Model X crossover SUV, will be built with Supercharger compatibility in mind. But it seems unlikely that Supercharger technology will be incorporated into any non-Tesla cars.
The six charging stations launched yesterday -- carefully positioned to make it possible for Model S owners to drive between San Francisco and Los Angeles; LA and Las Vegas; and San Francisco and Lake Tahoe -- will be the first Superchargers to go online, when approved for public use sometime next week.
But they won’t be the last. By next year, Tesla has promised it will have Superchargers along other ‘high-traffic’ routes in the U.S., including one from Los Angeles to New York; a route from Vancouver to San Diego; and even Montreal all the way to Miami.
Where possible, many of the Superchargers will be powered by a solar carport built by SolarCity--which also happens to share its CEO, Elon Musk, with the startup electric-car maker.
The solar carports, Tesla says, will generate more power than will be used by the Superchargers, feeding excess energy back into the grid.
A few weeks ago, Motor Trend borrowed Musk’s personal 2012 Model S, and drove it from Los Angeles to Las Vegas on a single charge to see if it was possible.
By limited both speed and the use of air conditioning, the car arrived with range to spare, but we can’t help but feel a little sorry for the Motor Trend team.
With a Tesla Supercharger now online in Barstow, California, the trip to Las Vegas in a 2012 Model S is now easily possible--without sacrifices in speed or personal comfort.
The entire Supercharger event was webcast live, in the same air of showmanship the company used for the unveiling of the 2013 Model X crossover SUV and first deliveries of its 2012 Model S.
What will Tesla’s Supercharger network mean for Tesla owners? What will it mean for electric cars?
And, should Tesla consider licensing the Supercharger quick-charging technology to other automakers (if any were interested)?
Let us know in the Comments below.
+++++++++++
Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.
Have an opinion?
Tesla could have really simplified the whole charging conundrum by following the Renault model of on board fastchargers rather than trying to set up its own network of proprietary fastchargers. All that would have been needed was a network of simple high output power sockets, no need for a standard. It's the sort of non-standard the industry might be willing to follow. Seems like a simpler approach than to set up a network that's only suitable for Tesla vehicles and will be obsolete anyway once better batteries require more than 120KW chargers.
If further ramp up goes to plan, it looks like that from December or January they sell more pure EV's than the other manufacturers combined. They are treading unclaimed territory and you bet they're not settling for the Calimero role.
I assume the charging circuitry can be retrofitted at reasonable cost to provide more than 120 kW. But why would better batteries require more than 120 kW? The basic routine (2-3 hours driving, 30 minute stop) is dictated energy consumption, not battery size.
But.....This man, Elon Musk is a genius. I love Tesla and applaud them for all their great work. Add a 3kw solar system at home and you drive on sunshine full time.
"Supercharger system will always generate more power from sunlight than Model S customers use for driving."
Cheers
First, every one of these new Tesla supercharger stations is in a very sunny, bright area getting great sun for solar power.
Second, not this year not next year will there be any more then a few Teslas total using the stations during the mid workweek...the high use time will be Friday's through Mondays. So the excess electricity will go to the grid when it is most neeeded during the workweek days.
Third, there will be additional EV charging stations along these routes in the next couple years so that some Tesla drivers may choose to use them instead of the Tesla stations.
or Apple is in Computers, but, it's tricky to maintain a premium, proprietary
standard.
B&O and Apple did it, lets see what happens with Tesla.
I would agree that they need a backwards compatibility to ChaDeMo and J1772 because those are crutches to the Model S, but,
i'd take a miserable 5 hour charging experience compared to being stuck in the desert.
In the mean time, Tesla has once again paved the way and increased consumer expectations. Now, if they only made an affordable car for commuters and other working stiffs.
Now the question is this (try to play devil's advocate), on a busy holiday weekend, I imagine the charging station in Folsom and Barstow will be filled up with Teslas going between Tahoe/SF and LV/LA. What do Tesla drivers do in those situation? Wait 1 hour for those spots? It won't be a problem most of the time except for those busy holiday weekends... Also, as more lower power version (60KWh) rolls out, the demand for those stations will be higher and they would need more stations than what they have today.
Well, come to CA to check it out. The hwys are "parking lots" during those weekends and I would imagine a lot of the Tesla S sales would be concentrated in the SF Bayarea and LA area..
What's Tesla's answer?
That was until I tried it - it's really slick, small, easy to insert, hard to misalign and, it makes a satisfying 'click'.
It forced me to re-think how often I've wanted my Tesla Roadster to work with J1772 compared to the number of times I've plugged in my Tesla each night. In the end, I choose better over standard. I'd prefer to have a better experience each night than a better experience for the occasional time I need to plug in away from home.
I doubt Tesla will license the tech - why deploy fast charging for your competitors?
While the bulk of battery-electric car drivers use them for local driving and commuting, rather than long-distance trips, your statement has already been disproven.
As for battery switching, you may or may not know that what you propose has already been set up in Israel. It's called the Better Place system, and this site has covered it extensively--including several very favorable reports from our author "Brian of London," an early customer.
Read up and see what you think. The challenge would be scaling that approach to the U.S. for different batteries in each car.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!