Advertisement

Green Car Buyers Need 4-Year Payback, Says Ford

 
Follow Antony

2013 Ford Focus ST  -  First Drive, Southern France, June 2012

2013 Ford Focus ST - First Drive, Southern France, June 2012

Enlarge Photo

Related Photo Galleries


See more photos »

Why do you drive your green car? Is it to do your bit for reducing pollution, greenhouse gases and dependency on oil, or is it simply to reduce your gas bills as prices creep upward?

If it's the latter, then Ford says you're the sort of consumer who'll only be driving a green vehicle if you can recoup the extra purchase cost fairly quickly.

In fact, Ford's research suggests that one in four buyers will pay extra on a green vehicle if they can make back that cost in four years or less.


That's according to Joe Bakaj, Ford Motor Co.'s vice president of powertrain engineering, during a conference presentation during the Center for Automotive Research "Management Briefing Seminars" held outside Traverse City, Michigan.

According to Automotive News, Bakaj says the information has helped Ford develop a useful blueprint for rolling out electric vehicles, hybrids and other fuel-efficient powertrains.

That includes Ford's quick-selling EcoBoost powertrains, that use turbochargers and direct injection to make up for power that would otherwise be lost by downsizing engines--but retaining the high gas mileage of those smaller units.

EcoBoost is even proving popular in vehicles where displacement used to rule--43 percent of F-Series pickup buyers now choose the 3.5 EcoBoost, despite it costing more than the V-8.

But is it about payback?

We've speculated before that the importance of payback varies depending on the vehicle and consumer. For EcoBoost Fords, the time may well be around four years--or perhaps even less. But with electric cars, it could be considerably longer, particularly for early adopters who may be choosing cars based on more specific criteria than the general public.

Even so, we've found that payback on hybrids like the Toyota Camry and Hyundai Sonata is less than five years, which is surely attractive to buyers--and no doubt the reasont that Ford is stepping up its hybrid and plug-in vehicle lines, with Fusion and C-Max hybrid and plug-in "Energi" models.

Ford actually admits that the newly-priced C-Max Energi won't meet that four-year payback target, but the company's overheads are relatively low so it doesn't have a lot to lose on the car.

And whether customers get that four-year payback or not, the 95 MPGe rating is sure to go down well with green-minded consumers.

+++++++++++

Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.





 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (5)
  1. Ford has is partially correct. The fact is I would pay a few thousand dollars more to help the environment but not $40 grand for a Volt or 33 for a leaf. Ford has also been a little tardy with their roll out of the little ecos. Like the 58 mph three cylinder Focus they've been raving about in Europe. Don't wait too long Ford. The Prius C is also reasonably priced.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

     
  2. I disagree. Payback is not absolute with the Volt because it depends on your percentage of electric miles vs gas miles. If you can drive more than 90% on electricity, the payback on the Volt is astonishing. I lease a Volt. My total cost is the same as though I leased the cheapest new car. But that doesn't mean those figures apply to everyone. I happen to be able to drive almost all miles on electricity, so the Volt happens to be a very economical car for me.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. Smiling as I realise my pay back started the day I drove off the lot. I'm cash positive right now in my choice of electric car: all it takes is not to own the battery!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. With gas cars, people pay extra for all sorts of options. The ONLY feature that has "payback" calculated is the "green" option. "Green" is so unpleasant that most drivers will only take it if it pays for itself.

    This makes sense for gas cars. To make a gas car green, you have to get it to use less gas. You reduce weight by making it smaller and removing content; reduce drag by streamlining it (which doesn't have to make it ugly, but often does), and put in a smaller engine, which makes more noise and produces less power. A green gas car is a lesser car.

    But larger electric motors are MORE efficient. Electric drive is smooth, quiet, torquey, responsive--features gas drivers pay extra for! Better cars don't have to "pay for themselves".
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

     
  5. The punchline is that EVs *do* pay for themselves. For example, over 10 years I'd spend $51,165 if I bought a Ford Focus Titanium including gas, maintenance, taxes. That assumes constant $4 gas. If I bought a Focus EV, I'd only spend $47,935, including maintenance, electricity, EVSE, and a new battery--at which point the EV's resale value would be far above that of the Titanium. And I don't have to "wait" for the "payback" unless I pay cash--if I lease or buy on credit like most Americans, I subtract the fuel savings from the very first month.

    The EV is smoother, quieter, has better throttle response, and has more equipment. And this is despite Ford not trying--they are converting a gas car in very small quantities, which is expensive.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Advertisement

Find Green Cars

Go!

Advertisement

 
© 2013 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC.