Advertisement

2012 Renault Fluence Z.E. Comprehensive Drive Report Page 2

 
Follow Nikki

2012 Renault Fluence Z.E.

Related Photo Galleries


See more photos »

2012 Renault Fluence Z.E.

2012 Renault Fluence Z.E.

Enlarge Photo

The inside

Unlike some of its closest rivals, the 2012 Fluence Z.E. isn’t aimed at early adopters and geeks. Instead of being filled to the brim with large touch-screen displays, strange gear levers and quirky methods to cajole its driver to practice ecological driving techniques, the Fluence Z.E.’s primary dashboard is dominated by two primary dials: the speedometer and the battery state-of-charge meter. 


Modeled on traditional analogue dials, the speedometer and battery gauge should be familiar to anyone who has driven a car, making the Fluence Z.E. less tech and more car than many of its rivals. 

That feeling is carried on to the gear selector and parking brake. Simplicity wins over, with a traditional hand-operated parking brake, and conventional forward-backward automatic-style gear lever mounted on the floor. 

In fact, were it not for the Z.E.-branded satellite navigation from TomTom and various special trim panels bearing the Z.E. insignia, anyone sitting inside the Fluence Z.E. would have trouble telling it apart from its gasoline sibling. 

The drive

Throughout our time with the car, the 2012 Fluence Z.E. provided a competent ride, easily coping with both city and rural traffic. 

Power is provided courtesy of its 70 kilowatt motor, making a 0-62 mph time of around 13 seconds and an electronically-limited top speed of 84 mph.  When compared to the 2012 Nissan Leaf, the 2012 Renault Fluence Z.E. is a little slower to accelerate, both on paper and in the real world. 

When it came to handling, we preferred the Fluence Z.E.’s heavier steering over the 2012 NIssan Leaf, although we noted that the higher battery pack meant the Fluence had a little more body roll on corners than the Leaf,

2012 Renault Fluence Z.E.

2012 Renault Fluence Z.E.

Enlarge Photo

Generally, the Fluence Z.E.’s road manners were befitting of a mid-priced saloon, with firm and responsive braking. Initially, we found the mild regenerative breaking on accelerator lift-off didn’t slow us down as quickly as we might have hoped, making single-pedal style driving impossible. 

Given more practice and a little more anticipation, and we were able to slow the Fluence Z.E. down using accelerator lift-off regenerative braking only. 

However, when it came to wet roads, the Fluence Z.E. wasn’t quite as well-mannered as its all-black leather interior and benign dials would suggest. 

Accelerating from standstill, our car behaved impeccably -- but our first test car struggled to keep control of the motor’s 166 foot-pounds of torque when accelerating while moving.

Even with traction control engaged, the car’s front wheels wanted to loose grip on the wet roads too easily. Switch off traction control, and the car became un-drivable. 

Competent, but beige

We enjoyed our 150 miles of driving the Fluence Z.E., and loved the car’s quiet interior and comfortable leather seats.  However, the Fluence’s uninspiring 0-62 mph time, combined with mediocre handling left us feeling... a little apathetic towards this Gallic car. 

It isn’t that the 2012 Renault Fluence Z.E. isn’t a good car either. It’s a perfectly functional car with plenty of merit. But when it comes to handing out fun, the Fluence Z.E. must have skipped class that day. 

Then again, the Fluence Z.E., as Renault is keen to point out, isn’t a consumer-facing car. It’s primarily a fleet car -- with over 80 percent of cars heading to the fleet market.

For the fleet market, the Fluence Z.E. is perfect. It’s simple to drive, requires no pre-existing knowledge of electric cars, and even comes in corporate-friendly shades of blue and grey and white.  Add to that the ability to switch out the battery pack in countries where Better Place is established, and the Fluence Z.E. is the ultimate fleet vehicle. 

Sadly however, what works in the corporate sector rarely works in the home market. Like the ubiquitous office computer of old, the Fluence Z.E. is too businesslike to be a family car. 

In short, it’s too beige, too straight-laced. 

There is hope

But there’s hope. While we -- and Renault -- say the Fluence Z.E. won’t be sold to many private buyers, the concept of producing a simple-to-drive, conventional-layout electric car is a good one. 

Renault’s next highway-capable electric car -- the 2013 Zoe -- promises impressive performance and ultra-rapid 30-minute onboard recharging in an all-new hatchback design.  But like its alliance sibling the 2012 Nissan Leaf, the Zoe looks to be heading the way of a gadget-filled techno-car for younger drivers who want to proclaim their green credentials. 

And that’s a big shame, because consumers don’t need another gadget-filled, hard-to-understand electric car. 

Our only hope is that someone at the Renault-Nissan alliance listens, and produces a car which is both conventional in its design, but a whole lot less beige to drive.

Renault provided airfare, lodging, and meals to enable High Gear Media to bring you this first-person drive report.

+++++++++++

Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.






 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (3)
  1. Too slow. Technology that surely will be eclipsed by the more affordable batteries that seem very close at hand. Like the Volt and range extended EVs, these look to be made obsolete long before the design's planned lifespan. Lack of competition for battery packs, service, etc. is a horrible situation. These battery packs are going to prove very expensive, with lots of overhead. You are subscribing to our generation's version of the company store. Proprietary technologies are always a step backwards.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. "And that’s a big shame, because consumers don’t need another gadget-filled, hard-to-understand electric car."

    Mitsubishi i is the car for those who don't need gadget-filled, hard-to-understand electric car.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. I can understand why in markets wher Better Place is present, Renaultmhave been asked to make a car that drives customers towards the BP swap stations. However, in other countries where there is no intention to set up swap stations, such as the UK (as told to me by Renault), they have shot themselves in the foot massively by limiting a car like this to a 3kW charger. It was one of the reasons I backed out (others being practicality, boring drive and delay in delivery) and it will certainly lead to a rash of stories about how this could have been a great car apart from the non-utility of a car that is effectively limited to a 40 mile radius.

    Come on Renault, do the right thing and stick a CHAdeMO on it to make use Nissan's network.
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Advertisement

Find Green Cars

Go!

Advertisement

 
© 2013 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC.