Advertisement

Automaker Alliance Resumes Fear-Based Fuel Economy Ads


Gas pump with dollars

Gas pump with dollars

Enlarge Photo
Just 24 hours after pulling a series of radio ads designed to alarm the public about upcoming fuel economy rules, the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers resumed airing the radio spots on Friday morning.

A spokeswoman for the AAM confirmed that the ads would run in an unspecified number of states, specifically those with “many auto jobs or a high proportion of truck buyers.”

The decision to run the ads came after an unspecified automaker and AAM member changed its mind about opposing the ads. An industry trade association, the AAM includes Ford, Chrysler, General Motors, Toyota and eight other automakers in its membership.

The AAM has vehemently opposed stricter fuel economy regulations proposed by the EPA, which has proposed a Corporate Average Fuel Economy standard of 56.2 mpg by 2025.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency adminstrator Lisa Jackson and President Barack Obama

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency adminstrator Lisa Jackson and President Barack Obama

Enlarge Photo
Enacting such a standard would will hike new car prices by no more than $2,600, but save consumers $7,000 over the vehicle’s lifespan in fuel costs, according to the Obama administration.

The AAM ads discount this, saying only, “families would be hit with higher car prices,” and “small businesses dependent on vans, SUVs or pickups would face limited vehicle choices.”

Many environmentalists feel that not increasing fuel economy standards could be even more detrimental to the U.S. auto industry. Jack Gillis, of the Consumer Federation of America , summed it up by saying, “reducing fuel economy requirements will ensure that U.S. vehicles remain uncompetitive in the global market.”

Nonetheless, automakers have touted gloom-and-doom worst-case predictions that many view as vastly overblown, compared to far less dire projections issued by independent observers and industry analysts.

An agreement could come as early as next week, but formal proposals from both the federal government and California aren’t due before the end of September.

[The Detroit News]

+++++++++++

Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.

Advertisement
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (2)
  1. Someone who adheres to global warming theories actually can claim that "fear based" arguments are
    invalid? Global warming arguments are hardly anything but fear mongering. Talk about calling the kettle black. Geeez! And since when did anyone give Obama the power to decide what consumers shall drive over the next 50 years? He will be gone in a few months and, since his proclamations have no force of law, what are the automakers worried about? Since when did this country become a dictatorship where the Prez can simply issue one of his silly and pointless (and uninforceable)executive proclamations? And exactly why is our fearless leader calling himself a democrat? In a democracy the people are supposed to decide what laws get passed. Sabe?
     
    Post Reply
    -2
    Bad stuff?

     
  2. Ramon: I'm curious. You're a frequent commenter on this site, which we appreciate. But your posts have been almost entirely negative. You seem to be angry about a lot of things relating to green cars, California, national and state government, and many other topics. What gives?
     
    Post Reply
    +3
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion? Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Advertisement

Find Green Cars

Go!

Advertisement

 
© 2014 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by izmo, Inc.