Advertisement

Consumer Reports On 56.2-MPG Gas-Mileage Goal: Meh, Can Do Better

 
Follow John

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency adminstrator Lisa Jackson and President Barack Obama

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency adminstrator Lisa Jackson and President Barack Obama

Enlarge Photo

Much debate will occur--and that's putting it politely--over the next round of gas-mileage standards, which the EPA hopes to finalize next year for 2017-2025 vehicles.

Earlier this week, news reports from Washington indicated that the Obama Administration and EPA are pushing for 56.2 mpg as the average fleet goal to be reached by 2025.

That number is lower than the 62 mpg that was the highest average studied by the agency, but far more aggressive than the 3-percent annual increase that automakers say they can meet.

Now, Consumer Reports--the bible for sober and fact-based car buyers--has come out with its own opinion of the proposed 56.2-mpg goal 15 years hence.

It can best be summarized in one word: Meh.

For those not up on internet lingo, that means, "Yeah, OK, whatever: We're not that impressed."

An article yesterday in the "News" section of CR's website is headlined, "56.2 mpg is good, but we can do even better."

You can practically hear the scions of Motor City choking on their morning coffee.

The article covers the official statement issued by Consumers Union, CR's parent organization. It supports the 56.2-mpg target as a minimum goal, but suggests that higher standards would be better.

It also, crucially, stresses the importance of closing a number of loopholes in the current regulations--perhaps most flagrantly, the extra credits given to automakers for building flex-fuel vehicles that can run both on gasoline and E85 ethanol.

One part of the proposed standard eliminates those credits unless automakers can show that the vehicles actually DO run on E85 in the real world. That hurdle is so unlikely to be met that automakers might simply walk away from building flex-fuel vehicles altogether.

2011 Toyota Prius

2011 Toyota Prius

Enlarge Photo
(Instead, ethanol is likely to make its way into vehicle fuel via higher percentages blended into gasoline--from today's E10 to the E15 now permitted for vehicles built from 2001 to the present.)

The key question is how much the more fuel-efficient technologies will cost.

Various studies from groups with various degrees of independence from the industry have issued conflicting projections on the costs and benefits of the new regulations.

According to CR research, almost two-thirds of consumers expect their new vehicles to return better gas mileage, and almost as many (58 percent) expect to pay more for cars with better fuel economy.

Consumer Reports is a well-respected voice for consumer interests, but we're interested in knowing where our readers stand.

What do you think is a reasonable average gas-mileage goal for the cars of 2025?

Leave us your thoughts in the Comments below.

[Consumer Reports]

+++++++++++

Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.



Advertisement
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (3)
  1. What interests me in the discussion here, and elsewhere, is there is no discussion of why we are interested in higher fuel economy in the first place. It is almost presented as if there is no downside to not increasing MPG.

    There will be serious consequences if we don't increase mpg including pollution, global warming, national security, balance of foreign trade, etc.

    Oh, and we might possibly be running out of oil by 2025. If gasoline is $10/gallon in 2025, a 62.5 mpg mandate might be seen as an obvious requirement rather than overly aggressive government action.
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

  2. As for how much more higher mpg vehicles cost, my answer is they don't cost any more than the vehicle you are going to buy anyway. Most people's purchasing decisions involve spending as much as they think they can afford. As a result, the average selling price in the USA is $29,000. Since the Prius starts at $23,500, it is less expensive than what most people are spending. Granted your dollars might be going toward a hybrid drive system rather than leather seats, but the vehicle will not cost you any more.
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

  3. The hibrid car is fanyastic idea and I will ad a better solution of the fuel saving, my invention don't use any fuel at all cero, zip, only electricity and compress air
    I am a professional Mechanic Designer, I am a student at Miami Community College pursuing my degree in Mechanical Engineering, I am retired, I served in the USA. Air Forces, I was born in Cuba and emigrated in 1955, I am professional Artist, my painting are exhibit at the UNESCO in Germany and other locations, I exhibited in Paris my art works and now I am designing apparatus to help with the environmental problems that the world is facing today, I designed an engine that don't use fossil fuel and a Wind Tower Turbine to generating electricity for City buildings
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion? Join the conversation!

Advertisement

Find Green Cars

Go!
Advertisement

Advertisement

 
© 2014 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC.