Believe it or not, most of what you watch on television is scripted.
What you may not know is that some shows which appear unscripted, like the BBC’s infamous Top Gear, are also scripted word for word. Everything from the banter between its three middle-aged hosts to its madcap challenges and car reviews has been meticulously planned, before any filming takes place.
Two years ago, Tesla Motors found out what that really meant when its duo of 2008 Tesla Roadsters were doomed to a biased and unrealistic depiction on screen before the film crew even unpacked their equipment or TopGear presenter Jeremy Clarkson had stepped on set.
In documents released as part of Tesla Motor’s libel claim filed against the publicly owned British Broadcasting Corporation earlier this week, the Californian automaker detailed the negative script delivered by Clarkson while reviewing its Roadster, alleging that the infamous scene showing four members of the TopGear crew pushing a supposedly drained Roadster into a hangar was completely staged.
The court documents, filed in the U.K. detail how Tesla’s former U.K. Director of Sales and Marketing expressed concern to the producers of the show after seeing a script on the day of the shoot before filming had even begun.
Describing everything from the car being filmed ‘running out of charge’ to the host’s conclusions of “It’s just a shame that in the real world, it absolutely doesn’t work.”, the Tesla employee reportedly confronted the show’s researcher who agreed that filming the $109,000 sportscar being pushed into a hangar having run out of charge was not acceptable, noting “We don’t want to be sued”.
Without Tesla's knowledge the shoot went on regardless with the script being stuck to rigorously. It wasn’t apparent until after the initial airing of the show in December 2008 just how many misleading accusations had been made by the motoring entertainment show about the car's performance and reliability.
In addition, the show is alleged to have made false claims about both cars loaned to them for the shoot, including the implication that both cars were rendered unusable after spirited driving. These claims are refuted in the court documents, detailing testimony from a Tesla engineer present on set on the day of filming.
Since the initial screening of the episode on U.K. television, the episode in question has been screened worldwide, placed on Internet video sharing sites such as YouTube and even sold in TopGear DVD Box Sets.
It is this continued disregard for Tesla and its cars which has caused the automaker to sue, 2 years after the initial show aired.
If successful, Tesla will win a court injunction preventing the BBC from airing the show in future on its own or syndicated networks as well as preventing the broadcaster from ever repeating such allegations.
Tesla should note however, that scripted or not the multinational, multimillion-dollar Top Gear franchise has repeatedly been accused of homophobic, nationalistic, xenophobic stereotyping. It has dodged many of those accusations in the past by claiming it is nothing more than an entertainment show.
Will such a claim work this time? We hope for Tesla’s sake that it won’t. After all, since Top Gear's former Stig Ben Collins came out of the electric car closet as a fan of the electric sportscar we think Tesla may just stand a chance of winning.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!
By paul Posted: 3/31/2011 10:08am PDT
By Chris O Posted: 3/31/2011 10:46am PDT
By Paul Posted: 3/31/2011 11:51am PDT
By Dom Posted: 3/31/2011 12:31pm PDT
By BB Posted: 3/31/2011 12:46pm PDT
By pat b Posted: 3/31/2011 12:54pm PDT
Far more effective to put the PR offensive on, and get a second review.
If Tesla had their new transmission in, or a updated battery, or the next years model which has a J1779 charger. They could get a second hearing and a improved review. Suing just means more bad press.
It is said any publicity is good publicity and they should accept that.
By Bret Posted: 3/31/2011 1:02pm PDT
Top Gear is going to lose big in court. There is no question they have caused damage to Tesla'a brand with false reporting. They can call it entertainment all they want, but it's still libel when they make false statements.
By John Posted: 3/31/2011 3:23pm PDT
By John Posted: 3/31/2011 3:25pm PDT
By EV Miata Posted: 3/31/2011 4:43pm PDT
By david Posted: 3/31/2011 5:00pm PDT
Why, in this current political climate,is the whole electric car issue an uphill battle? I despair.
By Nick Posted: 4/1/2011 8:38am PDT
By Chris O Posted: 4/1/2011 12:09pm PDT
By Gopal Posted: 4/1/2011 2:39pm PDT
By Norbert Posted: 4/2/2011 3:58am PDT
By Rolf Westgard Posted: 4/2/2011 8:52pm PDT
By Eric Posted: 4/3/2011 1:08pm PDT
By The Truth Posted: 4/4/2011 10:44am PDT
By electricworry Posted: 4/5/2011 5:36am PDT
So it doesn't matter if they were lying or loose with the truth. I'm not going to spend $80,000 (or $58,000) on any car, electric or gasoline powered.
Maybe Tesla should work on building a realistic vehicle to be reviewed by serious automotive journalists.
By Nick Posted: 4/6/2011 2:56pm PDT
That particular shoot out was dumbfounding, even for Clarkson's standards. Hailing a hydrogen sedan as a better bet than a sleek high performance EV is just too painful to watch.
By Grant Renton Posted: 4/8/2011 6:03am PDT
For the sake of the motor industry TG tears apart on regular occasions, Tesla deserves to win. The big cheeses within the UK motor industry have their fingers crossed that Tesla can bring TG to book. The team is far too arrogant for their own good and that includes the team behind the cameras.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!