Tesla Vs BBC: Top Gear Planned Dead Electric Car Shot Before Test

 
Follow Nikki

Top Gear's Jeremy Clarkson

Top Gear's Jeremy Clarkson

Enlarge Photo

Believe it or not, most of what you watch on television is scripted. 

What you may not know is that some shows which appear unscripted, like the BBC’s infamous Top Gear, are also scripted word for word. Everything from the banter between its three middle-aged hosts to its madcap challenges and car reviews has been meticulously planned, before any filming takes place. 

Two years ago, Tesla Motors found out what that really meant when its duo of 2008 Tesla Roadsters were doomed to a biased and unrealistic depiction on screen before the film crew even unpacked their equipment or TopGear presenter Jeremy Clarkson had stepped on set. 

In documents released as part of Tesla Motor’s libel claim filed against the publicly owned British Broadcasting Corporation earlier this week, the Californian automaker detailed the negative script delivered by Clarkson while reviewing its Roadster, alleging that the infamous scene showing four members of the TopGear crew pushing a supposedly drained Roadster into a hangar was completely staged. 

The court documents, filed in the U.K. detail how Tesla’s former U.K. Director of Sales and Marketing expressed concern to the producers of the show after seeing a script on the day of the shoot before filming had even begun. 

Tesla versus Top Gear

Tesla versus Top Gear

Enlarge Photo

Describing everything from the car being filmed ‘running out of charge’ to the host’s conclusions of “It’s just a shame that in the real world, it absolutely doesn’t work.”, the Tesla employee reportedly confronted the show’s researcher who agreed that filming the $109,000 sportscar being pushed into a hangar having run out of charge was not acceptable, noting “We don’t want to be sued”.

Without Tesla's knowledge the shoot went on regardless with the script being stuck to rigorously. It wasn’t apparent until after the initial airing of the show in December 2008 just how many misleading accusations had been made by the motoring entertainment show about the car's performance and reliability.

In addition, the show is alleged to have made false claims about both cars loaned to them for the shoot, including the implication that both cars were rendered unusable after spirited driving.  These claims are refuted in the court documents, detailing testimony from a Tesla engineer present on set on the day of filming. 

Since the initial screening of the episode on U.K. television, the episode in question has been screened worldwide, placed on Internet video sharing sites such as YouTube and even sold in TopGear DVD Box Sets.

It is this continued disregard for Tesla and its cars which has caused the automaker to sue, 2 years after the initial show aired. 

Ben Collins (The Stig) With Tesla

Ben Collins (The Stig) With Tesla

Enlarge Photo

If successful, Tesla will win a court injunction preventing the BBC from airing the show in future on its own or syndicated networks as well as preventing the broadcaster from ever repeating such allegations. 

Tesla should note however, that scripted or not the multinational, multimillion-dollar Top Gear franchise has repeatedly been accused of homophobic, nationalistic, xenophobic stereotyping. It has dodged many of those accusations in the past by claiming it is nothing more than an entertainment show. 

Will such a claim work this time? We hope for Tesla’s sake that it won’t. After all, since Top Gear's former Stig Ben Collins came out of the electric car closet as a fan of the electric sportscar we think Tesla may just stand a chance of winning. 

[Tesla]





Posted in:
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (21)
  1. is that all Tesla is asking for? No damages or a broadcast retraction? Sounds like you could do a pretty funny segment with a highlighted script and some outtakes.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. The Top Gear show from the eighties and nineties was about more or less serious consumer info and they kept their clown Clarkson around for comic relieve. The 2002 season saw the clown take over the circus and ever since I still watch but never ever take anything the three stooges of Top Gear say or do seriously. Apparently though not everybody can spot the difference between a clown show with cars in it and automotive journalism, so maybe some kind of viewer discretion warning should come with the show.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. LoL, when did top gear in its recent format appear unscripted?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. exactly what Paul said. They even put outtakes on topgear.com so you know its rehearsed. Its an entertainment show. I'd still like to see the Tesla roadster given a proper test segment though. Maybe put it against the Fisker Karma and Porsche 918? 3 price brackets, which works best for the real world - cue a bonkers road test.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. Even with all the falsified rubbish, the car still did the Top Gear test track in the same time as the Porsche 911 GT3. Not too shabby.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. It is a poor policy to sue people who own printing presses and airwaves.
    Far more effective to put the PR offensive on, and get a second review.
    If Tesla had their new transmission in, or a updated battery, or the next years model which has a J1779 charger. They could get a second hearing and a improved review. Suing just means more bad press.
    It is said any publicity is good publicity and they should accept that.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  7. This is a lot like the news show that put the igniter in the gas tank of the Chevy truck to make it explode.
    Top Gear is going to lose big in court. There is no question they have caused damage to Tesla'a brand with false reporting. They can call it entertainment all they want, but it's still libel when they make false statements.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  8. If you all didn't know the so called Top Gear in question is an ENTERTAINMENT show and not to be taken seriously, as long as they remember that Top Gear will be fine. Screw Tesla and their sensitive engineers.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  9. If you all didn't know the so called Top Gear in question is an ENTERTAINMENT show and not to be taken seriously, as long as they remember that Top Gear will be fine. Screw Tesla and their sensitive engineers.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  10. Go TESLA! Sue the buggers! Too many people believe what these goofballs say is the gospel. They need to be held accountable for the misinformation and lies they spread.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  11. What disturbs me about this incident is why on earth would they do it?
    Why, in this current political climate,is the whole electric car issue an uphill battle? I despair.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  12. It's too bad but it was that particular airing that turned me off of Top Gear. Until then I even stomached the Alfa bashing but this one was so ridiculous. I don't know if you remember but he concluded that Honda's hydrogen clarity was the way to go by far better than the Roadster. I've driven both and at that stage knew this guy was... how should we say this... not worth watching or listening to.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  13. I think the Tesla lawsuit is pretty useful after all. It inspires some good blogging like this article that remind people that the fact that it's on TV doesn't necessarily mean it's true. However inconvenient, you just can't let the idiot box do your thinking for you.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  14. Obviously Top Gear presented the facts so as to tell the story they wanted to tell, but if you look at Tesla's complaint, they make a lot of noise but basically concede that Top Gear never actually lied. They "worked out" that the car would have a range of 55 miles (after using some 80% of the charge), then the second car overheated and went into reduced power mode, then the first car had blown a fuse and didn't have power brakes anymore. Tesla says neither car was ever immobilized. But when one has reduced power and the other has only manual brakes, neither one is useful for track testing.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  15. @Gopal : Do you know how long it took the car to cool down, and how long it took the service technician (who was present at the site) to replace the fuse? Tesla said that one car was always "ready", and obviously that doesn't just mean "not immobilized", as otherwise Tesla would have said that both were always ready. So maybe you are one of those who were misled by the show into believing a falsehood?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  16. Buit in the end we still have range anxiety and few places to perform the lengthy recharge. Apparently early sales of the Volt and the Leaf are very disappointing.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  17. If it's just an entertainment show, shouldn't they put up a disclaimer saying so?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  18. Let's see a public apology by the show. And compensation to Tesla for the monetary damages they have endured from the lies. That's only fair.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  19. As others have pointed out, Top Gear is a comedy show. It's not automotive journalism. That's why they generally only "review" cars that the majority of people will never be able to afford...like the Tesla.
    So it doesn't matter if they were lying or loose with the truth. I'm not going to spend $80,000 (or $58,000) on any car, electric or gasoline powered.
    Maybe Tesla should work on building a realistic vehicle to be reviewed by serious automotive journalists.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  20. Top Gear is over and has been for a while now. Anyone who knew the show from way back then can attest, it used to be fun and not in your face. Turn your attention to Fifth Gear or Wheeler and Dealer instead.
    That particular shoot out was dumbfounding, even for Clarkson's standards. Hailing a hydrogen sedan as a better bet than a sleek high performance EV is just too painful to watch.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  21. Having worked behind the scenes at the TG test track it is fair to say pretty much all of the show is scripted, planned or pre-conceived. The stuff that appears to be ad hoc isn't.
    For the sake of the motor industry TG tears apart on regular occasions, Tesla deserves to win. The big cheeses within the UK motor industry have their fingers crossed that Tesla can bring TG to book. The team is far too arrogant for their own good and that includes the team behind the cameras.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Find Green Cars

Go!


 
© 2011 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC.