Why are many European carmakers now planning to build electric vehicles? Because many European cities are widely expected to ban high-emissions vehicles from their city cores over the next decade--perhaps even vehicles with any emissions at all.
Now, Paris may be the first city to experiment with such a policy. Next year, it will begin to test restrictions on vehicles that emit more than a certain amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) per kilometer--the measure of a car's contribution to greenhouse gases.
An official within the Parisian mayor's office, Denis Baupin, identified older diesel-engined cars and sport-utility vehicles as specific targets of the emissions limit.
"I'm sorry," Baupin said on RTL Radio, "but having a sport utility vehicle in a city makes no sense." He suggested that Parisian SUV owners replace their sport utilities with vehicles that are "compatible with city life."
Thus far, the specific details of the restrictions--including numeric limits, which types of engines and vehicles would be targeted, the locations and the timing of the bans--are still being debated, as are the penalties for flouting them.
Other French cities planning to test similar restrictions over the next two years include Lyon, Grenoble, and Aix-en-Provence.
London's congestion-charging scheme, which levies a fee of £10 (roughly $15.50) to enter a large area of the central city during weekday business hours, permits zero-emissions vehicles to enter free.
Residents and travelers have responded by buying thousands of electric cars, including the low-speed fiberglass G-Wiz--despite major safety concerns with the vehicle.
Electric cars such as the 2011 Nissan Leaf are expected to sell for the same reason. In fact, Nissan plans to build up to 50,000 Leafs a year at its plant in Sunderland, England, starting in early 2013.
[AP via Detroit Free Press]
Have an opinion?
Al Posted: 12/28/2010 1:40pm PST
samm Posted: 12/28/2010 7:23pm PST
Tom Posted: 12/29/2010 1:18am PST
General Lee Posted: 12/29/2010 1:23am PST
Jonas B. Posted: 12/29/2010 2:27am PST
Ben Posted: 12/29/2010 2:29am PST
Reggie Posted: 12/29/2010 5:13am PST
Grant Posted: 12/29/2010 5:41am PST
Jonathan Posted: 12/29/2010 6:35am PST
Grant Posted: 12/29/2010 6:57am PST
I'd say you are a little off base there bud. Playing cowboy has nothing to do with taking an active roll in conservation of wildlife. And there is certainly no need for the insertion of the "Jesus isn't going to make more" comment. Trucks weren't just invented to look cool. They serve a purpose, but I guess your pampered ass doesn't ever set foot outside of your little urban cage; so you have no idea what exists beyond your little internet/tv window to the world. What's next? No breathing in inner cities because most diseases are spread through the air? Let's take away even the basic decisions people are allowed to have now. Everyone yield to the hive mind. Piss on that "directed by laws" mentality. I'll take America any day.
Crash Posted: 12/29/2010 7:14am PST
Nick Posted: 12/29/2010 7:37am PST
Meanwhile, the Americans want this story about them, like the person who "Wants to be the bride at every wedding, the corpse at every funeral"
B1r Posted: 12/29/2010 8:02am PST
B1r Posted: 12/29/2010 8:02am PST
Jonathan Posted: 12/29/2010 8:17am PST
@Grant - Continue waving your 'Made in China' American flag on the deck of the Titanic. There are uses for trucks, no one is questioning that so don't reframe the issue. The issue is large vehicles that needlessly output a disproportionately high amount of CO2 in downtown Paris. As the article stated it's preliminary and I would be shocked if there wasn't exemptions for actual work vehicles. They are trying to discourage the mom with the SUV from ferrying her single child across the city in her rolling fortress. As you Americans say "If you don't like it, get out." =)
Grant Posted: 12/29/2010 8:38am PST
There is no doubt that the governments of Europe are structured differently than our own. For the most part it's for good reason and to accommodate higher population densities. As a normal American it is very probable that I consume more than you. I travel farther and I have a bigger vehicle. However, I think the geography and population distribution mandates my usage amounts. My problem is with the way that Europeans are so quick to point a finger at a "problem" and slap a law on it. Ok, maybe this law will be great and save mankind. Maybe it will put Europe ahead of everyone else for what is the inevitable regulation of the draining on our (Yes, you me and the entire world’s) fossil fuel resources. But the other side of the token is that people cannot keep making laws just because the majority feels a certain way.
Grant Posted: 12/29/2010 8:38am PST
Grant Posted: 12/29/2010 8:43am PST
Dawn Posted: 12/29/2010 9:15am PST
Emilien Posted: 12/29/2010 9:53am PST
This month, we got a few centimeters of snow and it was a huge panic. Accidents all over the news, people sleeping in their cars stuck on the freeway... Because of the incompetence of public services, at some point the only cars that could hit the road were the ones with 4WD... So much for being not "compatible with city life"...
Also, I am pretty sure they won't ban high-end sedans, because that's what they (and their lobbys) drive.
Once again, please French politicians, quit taking radical and uninformed decisions... That's not what progress is about.
HS250H Posted: 12/29/2010 5:16pm PST
José A. de Souza Jr. Posted: 12/30/2010 3:57am PST
dan Posted: 12/30/2010 8:31am PST
Enzo Posted: 12/30/2010 8:32am PST
Gabe Posted: 12/30/2010 10:17am PST
Grant Posted: 12/30/2010 12:59pm PST
The important statistics are the ones that are Per Capita. (That means how many per given sample size…since you can't figure things out yourself.) Let's start with the rate of incarceration:U.S. incarceration rates by race, June 30, 2006:
Whites: 409 per 100,000 Latinos: 1,038 per 100,000
Blacks: 2,468 per 100,000
Grant Posted: 12/30/2010 1:02pm PST
Wikipedia has the US pop at 308,745,538. That means 246,348,064 are white and 39,642,927 are black. MOAR!
Total Lethal crimes whites 42.8%(*16,277 perps) and blacks 36.5%(*16,277 perps) is 6966.56 for whites and 5941.1 for blacks.
Murders per capita. 2.83:100,000 for whites and 14.99:100,000 for blacks. That’s well over 5:1 murders for blacks to whites. You are an ass and I’m not racist, I’m just stating the facts. Next time you plan to belittle someone or call them ignorant, maybe you should think before you speak.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!