My 2013 Tesla Model S Electric Sport Sedan...
Tesla Model S Road Trip: Electric Cars Make It...
Tesla Model S "Delivery Roulette" Annoys Some...
One hurdle down: Tesla is now delivering production Model S electric cars to paying customers from its reservations list of 18,000 or so.
Next hurdle: Can Tesla Motors [NSDQ:TSLA] bring in enough cash from those sales, and ramp up production fast enough, to keep the company solvent?
It would appear the market thinks so, as Tesla stock has risen over the last six weeks from less than $28 a share to more than $32 a share.
MarketWatch analyst pessimistic
Nonetheless, a spate of recent articles have quoted MarketWatch financial analyst Jon Shinal suggesting that Tesla is "among the top candidates in Silicon Valley for a 2013 stock collapse" unless it secures additional funds.
Shinal noted on December 20 that Tesla spent down its cash through the third quarter of 2012, and would have been essentially out of money had it not drawn on the last of its $465 million in low-interest loans from the U.S. Department of Energy.
He notes that it had to lower its 2012 revenue forecasts in September, and had less than six months of cash on hand at the end of that month. And that Tesla's assets of $809 million were outweighed by its liabilities of $837 million.
![One-year history of Tesla Motors stock prices [NSDQ:TSLA] on Jan 11, 2013, as shown on Yahoo Finance One-year history of Tesla Motors stock prices [NSDQ:TSLA] on Jan 11, 2013, as shown on Yahoo Finance](http://images.thecarconnection.com/sml/one-year-history-of-tesla-motors-stock-prices-nsdqtsla-on-jan-11-2013-as-shown-on-yahoo-finance_100415068_s.jpg)
One-year history of Tesla Motors stock prices [NSDQ:TSLA] on Jan 11, 2013, as shown on Yahoo Finance
Enlarge PhotoThat stands to reason, of course: Tesla had just spent two years completing development of the 2012 Model S, and equipping its Fremont, California, assembly plant to build the car in volume.
And that all costs money.
'Cash flow positive' tweet
Tesla's Elon Musk tweeted on December 3 that the company had been "narrowly cash flow positive" the previous week. He hasn't repeated that tweet in any successive weeks.
The salient question is now: Can Tesla ramp up production quickly enough, and garner sufficient margin on each early Model S it sells, to keep the lights on, the vendors paid, and the production lines humming?
Tesla Motors isn't talking about its financials, and won't until it reports to shareholders on its year-end results--likely sometime in February.
Analysts will pore over those figures to see if the company achieved its revenue projections--the midpoint of the range was $420 million--and whether it did actually deliver 3,000 or more cars.
But it's clear that the company is working hard to do everything it can to boost revenue and cut expenses.
High-dollar models first
With perhaps 3,000 Model S cars delivered by Dec 31--roughly in line with its September statement that it would deliver 2,700 to 3,225 cars, though down from its first 2012 estimate of 5,000 cars--the company says it's now building 200 cars a week or more.
And those cars have all been the most expensive models with the 85-kilowatt-hour battery packs, which means Tesla is building the Model S variants that earn it the most cash first.
That's led to some frustration among reservation holders for the 60-kWh version, which has now been EPA-certified at 208 miles of electric range.
But discussions on stock forums like SeekingAlpha offer the views of both investors bullish on Tesla stock and those who've shorted it.
Bulls vs bears
Often, the optimists focus more on the company's achievements, awards, and largely satisfied customers (much of that covered on this site).
The pessimists, on the other hand, look more closely at the financials.
There's a nice roundup of the arguments on each side in a piece called "Is Tesla A Buy, A Short, Or A Stay-Away?"
A December article, "When Will the Tesla Investment Unravel?", notes that as of December 17, the seven preceding articles on the company had been favorable--indicating that sentiment among the site's authors and readers had shifted from bearish to bullish.
But one point made last week is worth considering.
Success priced in already?
In "History And Valuation Make Cash-Guzzling Tesla A Short" author Sneha Shah suggests that the stock price pretty much assumes that the company is already a success.
The car business is historically highly capital intensive, Shah notes, with very long product cycles and low profit margins of 2 to 5 percent.
Have an opinion?
It would take a couple of years after start of production, if still losing money, before the money would likely dry up.
In response to your "panicking shorter" comment, I presume you meant his arguments are similar to those that would be used by such a person. I note the following statement from Shinal: "The columnist has no position in Tesla shares, long or short."
But I don't think being a short, "malice," or "stupidity" are the ONLY three possible explanations for the views Shinal expressed in his article. Might it not be possible that he simply reads the numbers differently than you do?
Or is any mention of Tesla Motors at all that falls short of uncritical enthusiasm obviously caused by a malevolent desire to see the company fail?
But as to his ability to read numbers, its pretty unforgivable to just ignore the reality that shapes TSLA financials.
The Sept 30 data he bases his entire thesis on consists of results obtained while Tesla was shifting from an R&D business to a manufacturing business.
Projecting the past forward in this case is absurd. This is highlighted by the fact that its likely that by the time he published this piece, Tesla was producing more cars in a week than it had in the entirety of the year leading to its Sept 30 report.
Critical reporting is great and can help establishing facts; lies and manipulation...not so much.
Remember, the last time an entrepreneur started a car company from scratch in the U.S. whose brand survives today was Dec 1924. (It was Walter P. Chrysler.)
Yet whenever I write something other than glowing praise of the car, the company, and its executives & their actions, you slam me for "bias," tell me I'm unbalanced, accuse me of (as above) "lies and manipulations," and so forth.
That's just part of the journo game, but your slavish desire to see solely happy news about Tesla here won't work. That is all.
http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2013/01/you-idiot-course-trolls-comments-make-you-believe-science-less#prclt-KGdLxs1Z
...and considering the strong demand for its product there is just no way any of the numbers add up to bankruptcy any time soon. Quite the opposite.
NOK is only around $4 (was as low as less than $2 few months ago).
Whether TSLA is a good investment depends on how well Tesla can figure out production ramp. Those skills will be equally important in the launch of X model and the "blue star" model.
I believe Tesla is still 1 to 2 models away from being solid profitable. But I like the trend so far.
That is also why both Toyota and Mercedez have invested in it and GM has used it as a "target" of competition.
I'd suggest that the large short position also influences the stock price in the opposite direction, which should mean the stock price is not excessively optimistic.
And that they're now turning out 400 cars a week at an average of perhaps $80 K each? That's a cash flow of $32 million per week. At that rate--and with a backlog of 15,000 orders, there's no reason it shouldn't continue--they'll generate $1.5 billion in revenue in 2013.
That said, you can look at Tesla's financial data and see the problem. They are building a $200,000 car that they are selling for $100,000. No wonder people love it. Their sales and marketing costs were greater than their sales, their long term debt keeps growing by $100-200M per quarter, they had to sell $200M in new stock to be cash positive. Winner?
Overall, not really big news, IMHO. Let's comment after the finacials are finally published and I hope all of us hope for, and expect, the best. As long as the product seels well and reviews are good, any short-term cash flow problem can be answered with additional fundraising.
As others have noted, using a quarter where expenses were high just before launch is ridiculous and misleading.
And where did you get the idea that the Model S is a 200,000 car? Got any evidence? You doubt they can sell it for between 60k and 100k and make a profit because it costs them less to produce? Where is your evidence?
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!