Compared to its electric contemporaries, Chevrolet's range-extended Volt is currently proving the most popular plug-in, posting its best-ever sales figures during August.
It's out-punching the Leaf consistently, and other electric cars aren't even getting a look-in. It's even outselling Toyota's Plug-In Prius.
But overall, Chevy is still a long way from meeting its projected 45,000 target for this year, with year-to-date figures around the 13,500 mark.
And, says Reuters, GM could be losing as much as $49,000 on every Volt it makes.
Packed with technology, the Volt is an expensive car to make, and GM isn't making a great deal of money back on each one, despite the $39,995 base price. With some lease deals allowing customers to drive around in a Volt for as little as $5,050 over two years, GM's return looks insignificant.
High production costs, low sales
Some industry analysts predict that each Volt costs at least $75,000 to manufacture, though some suggest this figure could be as high as $88,000.
The numbers are compiled by industry experts like Michigan-based Automotive Consulting Group and Munro & Associates, and factor in the Volt's total development and tooling costs to date, divided among the 21,500 Volts sold to date.
So far, it puts average costs at just shy of $56,000 per car--though it's worth remembering that this figure will go down with every Volt sold, and unit production cost can only truly be calculated over the course of a full production run.
On top of the current unit cost, it's estimated that manufacturing cost for each car is between $20,000-$32,000 per vehicle, resulting in the final figures.
By contrast, the standard gasoline Chevrolet Cruze is estimated to cost between $12,000-$15,000 to build. To bring the Volt down to around $10,000 per car to build, GM would have to sell around 120,000 per year--but in an effort to push up sales, the low-cost lease deals are part of the problem while volumes remain low.
Another part of the problem is thought to be the Volt's relatively low production volumes, resulting in some parts suppliers pushing up component costs. A high quantity of unique parts over other cars on GM's Delta II platform--such as batteries, the electric motor and power electronics--also pushes up the unit cost.
GM's Doug Parks confirms that GM isn't yet making money on the Volt, but declined to comment to Reuters on any specific costs.
Other benefits
GM isn't yet fazed by the loss-making Volt--at least outwardly--citing other benefits to the Volt project.
Firstly, the Voltec system will attract greater economies of scale when it sees further service in other GM vehicles down the line, such as the 2014 Cadillac ELR luxury coupe.
GM is also learning technological lessons from the Volt project, some of which can be used even on vehicles that don't use the Voltec drivetrain.
"It wasn't conceived as a way to make tons of money. It was a big dip in the technology pool for GM. We've learned a boatload of stuff that we're deploying on other models," explains Parks.
A similar strategy has paid dividents for Toyota, whose multi-million selling Prius line now consists of four models, despite being a slow initial seller. And the Volt is attracting the same sort of customers as Toyota's hybrid--dealers say the Prius is the number one trade-in for Volt customers.
It isn't hard to imagine Volt sales steadily increasing just as the Prius did--though this does hinge on how many GM will sell when incentives end--but while the competitive lease deals are making the Volt fantastic value for consumers, it could be a long while before the car makes any money for GM.
[UPDATE: Want to know what Bob Lutz has to say about the Chevy Volt's production costs? Head over to our follow-up story]
+++++++++++
Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.
Have an opinion?
Well, I would say the Volt is the technology leader in this segment and the positive Press is worth the investment. GM is an innovator and leader in this area. Toyota seems to be lagging a little in comparison, really a win for GM.
Every "expert" has an agenda so the buck never stops at the opinion of some "expert".
Too bad, it would be convenient if we could just turn to experts to tell us the truth is but alas, that's just not how it works. The truth is a rare commodity in this world and rarely available from self proclaimed "experts".
GM was trying to improve its technology and expand its customer base, not targetting short-term profitability. If GM is able to use this technology and future variants, then they've done well in my opinion. I certainly had no intention of visiting a GM dealer before the Volt came out, so mission partly accomplished...
What's next,a blog from the 1990s stating that Toyota is losing money on the first generation Prius??? Perspective, please.
Pegging marginal cost somewhere between $20-$32K is pretty vague but at least indicates that the first paragraph of the Reuters article is misleading: more sales are unlikely to increase losses.
On the other hand, shouldn't reducing "average cost" from $250k to $88k be considered an awesome victory? We'll probably see the same media reporting $60k one year later, $45k two years later...until it does longer matter as the car is seen way too often on the public street.
And now I understand why GM/Ally can provide lease deals that sound ridiculously cheap ($199/mo) a few months ago. The cost to Ally on each base car could be only $30k after federal+state incentives, and GM might be offering further discounts (while still having marginal profit). They are probably not to earn much profit from that, but it's far from being a money pit.
Both of them are "realistic" numbers. Those are just battery cell cost.
GM never had a sales prediction of 45k Volts. What they said was that they were prepared to manufacture that many if the sales went that high.
figure a new platform is a billion dollars, (Tooling, Design, Homologation) so the Voltec engine can't be more then 400 Million. The cost of the Volt is an Ampera body/Chassis with the Voltec engine. Now a Cruze sells for 22K, and the Volt sells for $42K, so they've had $20K extra margin for the 30,000 units sold to date.
So GM has had over $600 Million in revenue to offset the VOLTEC and advertising and dealer training, etc,,,,
Not a huge margin, but, i suspect GM is not unhappy.
Bear in mind, this is not standard program accounting
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!