
Tesla Store - Portland OR
Tesla Model S Road Trip: Electric Cars Make It...
Buying A 2012 Tesla Model S: Pros & Cons Of...
2013 Tesla Model S: Green Car Reports' Best Car...
And, in what may be surprising to anyone who’s ever bought a new vehicle or been involved with the industry, there’s one other key difference: Tesla plans to do it entirely without traditional dealership franchises.
Instead, it’s building on the success of the ‘store’ strategy fine-tuned and carefully expanded by Apple—fine-tuned actually through the same person who’s now Tesla’s VP of sales and ownership experience, George Blankenship.
But through the years, other such attempts to sell cars from an automaker directly to the consumer have fallen flat. When we caught up with Blankenship last week, just before the opening of the electric automaker’s new Portland store, we asked him why the company is going about retailing its vehicles so differently.
“It’s sort of been that way for a hundred years; that is the model,” said Blankenship. “The model is that they do a bunch of research, hold a bunch of focus groups, and they decide that this is a car we should build; they design that car, they engineer it and manufacture it, and then they sell it to some dealer who then tries to sell it.”
“And it works, it works with thousands of cars sold every single day,” summed Blankenship, who pointed to Tesla’s different development process and revolutionary product. “That’s just not how we’re doing it.”
As we outlined last week, Tesla’s store strategy is clearly working—for informing new people about electric cars, bringing new people into the Tesla fold, and eliciting deposits on the Model S. The automaker has been hitting 11,000 visitors or more in a single week at at least one of its stores, and among its new stores designed around foot traffic it passed a million visitors so far in 2012.
Stores, not dealerships. Does it matter?
But wait. Aren’t dealerships—and our franchise system over them—highly regulated by the states? How can Tesla sell cars this way?
According to Leonard Bellavia, a franchise lawyer and expert in this field, they can’t—even when they avoid following a conventional dealership model. And while the money might not technically change hands at or to the dealership, Bellavia still believes that state and local governments may decide that such ‘factory stores’ can’t operate in their current way.
“Most states prohibit ‘factory stores’ and that is why Tesla is quick to point out that it doesn’t sell cars but rather refers customers to its website,” said Bellavia. “The problems it will encounter stem from the fact that the ‘selling’ of a vehicle does not require the actual signing of a contract and the taking of money.”
Selling, as used in relation to these state statures, generally also includes a long list of associated activities like displaying, test driving, or even demonstrating a vehicle’s features, Bellavia notes. “Tesla admits that it will facilitate the delivery of a vehicle in its locations, which also constitutes ‘selling,’” he adds.
“Every single state, every municipality, that a car company does business in, has a different set of rules and regulations,” said Tesla's Blankenship, who noted that the company’s strategy has of course been vetted by their legal team. “What I know is that we do what we can do in every area, we comply wherever we go and do what we’re allowed to do.”
Have an opinion?
Cars are increasingly a commodity and a use (rather than own) distribution methodology will become the norm.
It seems that Tesla are having a disruptive effect beyond the actual car itself, which can only be a good thing.
I would be worried if I were in the toupee business with all those car dealers "suffering".
It's sort of the Carnival mentality. Everybody thinks they can win the giant stuffed animal. Almost nobody does and the Carnival makes a tidy profit.
Jobs just for the sake of jobs is not good for the economy. You have to show that these jobs provide added value. If they do, they'll survive on their own merit. If they don't, they deserve to perish.
Furthermore, that part of the story ignores that the Tesla stores employ people too.
the old way entrenched with the big companies - i know what that is about.
time for a new way of doing things, and i think better for the consumer.
In Florida, the statutory language reflects this intention. See §320.645 (1), Fla. Stat. (2011).
Therefore, because Tesla does not have any franchise dealerships whatsoever, a statutory bar, such as the one in Florida, does not prohibit Tesla from selling cars.
I believe most states have language similar to the Florida Statute.
The only exception that I am aware of is Texas statute § 2301.476.
That statute prohibits manufacturers from selling cars entirely.
that is a business agreement between 2 parties, and should remain so.
This vast disparity in economic power and bargaining strength has enabled the factory to determine arbitrarily the rules by which the two parties conduct their business affairs. These rules are incorporated in the sales agreement or franchise which the manufacturer has prepared for the dealer’s signature. Dealers are with few exceptions completely dependent on the manufacturer for their supply of cars. When the dealer has invested to the extent required to secure a franchise, he becomes in a real sense the economic captive of his manufacturer.
For further reading see 29 Fla. St. U.L. Rev. 1057 at 1061
http://www.law.fsu.edu/journals/lawreview/downloads/293/Forehand.pdf
As far as the local economy argument, it is not founded in law. Therefore, no matter how vigorously anyone may argue it, it will never succeed in court.
Long Live Tesla :)
Electric cars need little service, a tire store will do every several years for most. An new windshield wiper here and there.
Pistons go away, dealer goes away. Jobs change. We all breathe easier. It will work out in the long run.
Car dealers are about as popular as Congress. Much of the time, both groups are trying to get away with something.
Auto manufacturers such as GM would love to see these archaric laws overturned and I am sure they are privately rooting for Tesla. Dealers will of course try to protect their turf, they will not receive any help from their manufacturers.
Tesla's plan is to cut out the middleman to reduce cost to you, the consumer, and maintain control for the betterment of their reputation. This is a win-win for the consumer.
What must be done to get and keep a customer happy? Need to go to store and talk to someone about the vehicle, options, financing options, service, parts, trade-ins, test drive. Now you buy it...so how easy is service or to just talk to someone about setting your car up differently. People want to buy where they will be taken care of. First problems or recall will be major test for all.
The states certainly aren't going to do anything as long as they get their appropriate share of sales taxes and fees.
Well, it seems that the Massachusetts State Automobile Dealers Association has started to challenge Tesla's first planned store in Natick, MA. Apparently, state law requires car dealers to maintain a service facility "near" the sales location. Tesla's planned service facility is 15 miles away in another town, which has led to the problems with their license to operate the Natick location.
http://www.metrowestdailynews.com/news/x40870367/Auto-dealers-group-wants-Natick-to-revoke-electric-car-license
http://insideevs.com/tesla-vs-natick-massachusetts-future-of-boutique-stores-on-the-line/
my guess is that it will be cheaper for the consumer to buy directly from the manufacturer.
that choice should not be taken away by the govt.
dealers are usually ridiculously priced, regarding service. next thing you know, the govt will force consumers to use dealers for service.
give em an inch, and they take a mile.
That reference should have been 'in a single *week*' -- to correspond with the other mention and this piece:
http://www.greencarreports.com/news/1077896_tesla-opens-portland-store-passes-a-million-visitors-so-far-in-2012
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!