Advertisement

BYD e6 Electric Taxi Burns After 112-MPH Drunk Supercar Driver Crash

 
Follow Nikki

BYD e6 Fire: Aftermath

BYD e6 Fire: Aftermath

Enlarge Photo

Over the weekend we heard the disturbing news that a BYD e6 electric taxi in Shenzhen China had burst into flames and killed three of its occupants after being hit by a speeding drunk driver. 

According to eyewitness reports, the BYD e6 taxi, one of around 400 e6 electric taxis being used in the area, was hit at around 3am on a popular downtown route by a Nissan GT-R driven by a drunk driver traveling at 112 mph or more. 

The impact was so great that the e6 was sent slamming into a tree, whereupon it burst into flames. 

ChinaAutoWeb says local television stations report its occupants, two women passengers and the taxi’s driver, were unable to escape before the flames engulfed the car.  

All three died in the ensuing fire.

Meanwhile, the drunk driver and the occupants of the second car he hit, a gasoline-powered taxi, all survived.

Chinese battery electric crossover: BYD e6 test drive, Los Angeles, May 2012

Chinese battery electric crossover: BYD e6 test drive, Los Angeles, May 2012

Enlarge Photo

Images after the accident clearly show that the rear of the taxi had deformed or buckled as a consequence of the impact and subsequent fire, but at this time there has been no formal word of how -- or why -- the blaze started. 

Without any official statements however, speculation points directly at the car’s powerful 53 kilowatt-hour lithium-ion battery pack, which is situated underneath the passenger cabin. 

Should we worry? 

No. Here’s why.

While the Chinese crash-testing authority, C-NCAP, has made dramatic improvements to its 2012 standards over previous years, its maximum impact speed test is just under 40 mph. 

Previously, cars were tested on their ability to survive a 34 mph impact test, and didn’t have to undergo any rear-end or pedestrian crash testing. 

In short, it’s likely that the BYD e6 which was involved in the collision was approved for use under less-stringent crash test standards. 

Just like their gasoline counterparts, any electric car sold in the U.S. today must pass a strictly-administered suite of crash tests designed to ensure that they meet the required federal automotive safety standards. 

Under the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, cars have to undergo side-impact and rollover tests in addition to frontal crash tests.

Designed to ensure that passengers stay safe in the event of a collision, the tests also examine the car’s battery pack and power electronics, ensuring that, like gas cars, the probability of post-crash fires and explosions are kept extremely low. 

2012 Fiat 500 IIHS crash testing

2012 Fiat 500 IIHS crash testing

Enlarge Photo

In addition, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) also carries out its own tests on all U.S. market cars, offering a second safety standard which is prized by automakers and consumers as much as those from the NHTSA.

Earlier today, BYD made an official statement in which it said that in the extensive crash-tests prior to its launch, BYD had not witnessed a single battery fire in an e6 vehicle, adding that some of the tests had led to a 50 percent deformation.

"Any vehicle undergoing multiple crashes and spinning like the one in the May 26 traffic accident will result in great danger for the passengers and driver," it said in the statement. "Even gasoline powered vehicles might burn," it concluded.

The tragic accident may also hurt BYD’s reputation in the U.S., where it is preparing an updated e6 for sale to U.S. consumers in the next few years. 



Advertisement
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (9)
  1. Looks like the passenger cell is not to badly damaged. You have to wonder if the passengers would have survived if not for the fire.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. I wasn't aware of any "regulations" associated with the govt's safety tests, which have been heavily criticized in the past for their unrealistic nature and inability to prevent automakers from designing specifically for good scores on the tests. I believe the govt tests simply provide ratings, nothing more. I know that the NHTA accepts ZERO responsibility for the validity of their tests - their ratings provide no liability protection for the automaker. I notice that the Feds never accept any responsibility for their own mistakes - the IRS can tell you how to prepare your taxes but doesn't guarantee their statements to be true. The EPA once sued GM for emissions violations, after the cars in question had passed their tests.
     
    Post Reply
    -1
    Bad stuff?

  3. The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) reports that in 2010 there were 184,500 vehicle fires with 285 deaths in the USA. So, should I really be worried about a car-b-que in my 100% electric Nissan LEAF?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

     
  4. I was 2 times in China and made GPS data loging at all journeys. Taxi driver on the highway to the airport 96 km/h (60mph) maximum. The fastest was 117 km/h on the highway with a convoy of government vehicles escorted by police.
    Such high speeds as the Nissan at the accident are very unusual in China.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. The article states they were hit by another car doing approx 112 mph and everybody is suspecting the battery fire for their death. I would imagine they were already dead from the double impact Car + Tree!
    Scaremongering again but then we are good at that.
     
    Post Reply
    +2
    Bad stuff?

  6. The Nissan is 1,7 tons heavy. At this impact, it is very likely that the 3 already died by whiplash before the car burned some minutes later.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  7. I wouldn't be worried. But I would still be interested in knowing how the fire was started. Was it caused by the battery? Was it caused by the punchture of the battery, the short in the battery from the crash or sparks igniting some fluids?
     
    Post Reply
    +2
    Bad stuff?

     
  8. And if it was caused by the battery so what! We all know gas powered cars will burn,cng powered cars will burn so if an ev does as well what does it prove.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

     
  9. More shades of WMD's
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion? Join the conversation!

Advertisement

Find Green Cars

Go!
Advertisement

Advertisement

 
© 2014 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC.