Advertisement

Will Electric-Car Charging Stations Get 'Roaming' Or Stay Proprietary?

 
Follow Nikki

Polar Charging Post and Nissan Leaf

Polar Charging Post and Nissan Leaf

Enlarge Photo

Related Photo Galleries


See more photos »

There’s an ongoing joke among electric car owners that every new electric car should come with a free wallet. 

Why? To store the array of cards, tags and access keys that electric car drivers inevitably collect to gain access to an increasingly complicated public charging network. 

Earlier this week, we highlighted our concerns that confusion over public charging networks is hurting electric car adoption, but now it’s time to examine if electric car charging networks could be simplified by the concept of roaming. 


What is roaming?

If you regularly travel, you’ll be familiar with the concept of cellphone roaming. Made possible thanks to agreements between rival cellphone companies, roaming allows you to make and receive calls on your cellphone, even if you’re in a different state or country. 

In the same way, electric car charging network roaming would require an agreement between the many charging station networks to allow members of rival networks to use charging networks customers are not members of when required. 

How would it work?

2011 Nissan Leaf plugged into an EVgo quick-charging station, Texas

2011 Nissan Leaf plugged into an EVgo quick-charging station, Texas

Enlarge Photo

As with cellphone roaming, customers of a charging network that required a roaming feature would most likely have to have it added to their standard membership for a fee. 

Once added, the roaming feature could either offer a set quota of roaming each month for a set fee, or ad-hoc, pay-as-you-use roaming when required. 

On arriving at a rival charging station, non-members would then be given access to the charging station as needed, but at a higher cost than native members would pay.

It’s complicated, costly

However, unlike cellphone companies whose business models and method of connection are broadly similar, different charging providers have different methods of authentication and charging. 

For example, some charging stations rely on RFID smart-cards, while others rely on a barcode reader. Some may even use specially-designed electronic keyfobs. 

To get these systems to coexist would require a serious collaborative effort between rival companies, something that is unlikely at the moment given the limited number of customers and high number of rival firms. 

Negotiating payment is even more complicated. While some companies charge high monthly membership fees for unlimited access to ‘free’ electricity, other firms charge customers a small yearly membership alongside metered pay-as-you-charge billing. 

Some companies, like ChargePoint, offer a midway-system, where the owner of the parking lot where the charging station is located sets charging rates, not the charging station provider. 

Change or die?

For cellphone providers, roaming agreements make good business sense. Not only do roaming agreements increase a network’s coverage for frequently-traveling customers, but they also become an additional revenue stream from monthly roaming subscriptions and additional call charges. 

But setting up roaming, including preparing agreements, agreeing on a standard and working together to ensure billing is correctly handled, is a major undertaking. 

For established cellphone companies with millions of customers, those costs can easily be amortized over the broad user base. 

Scenes from dedication of electric-car charging station at Creekside Inn, Palo Alto, CA

Scenes from dedication of electric-car charging station at Creekside Inn, Palo Alto, CA

Enlarge Photo

For electric car companies with small numbers of customers, the financial cost of implementing the technological changes needed to conform to a single roaming standard would likely be considered too great a financial burden at this time. 

However, in order for electric car adoption to increase, public accessibility to charging stations needs to become more transparent, making roaming an essential part of any future electric car infrastructure. 

Ultimately then, the companies that currently provide electric car charging have a choice:

Collaborate, or compete. 

And it is that single decision that may decide each firm’s future.

+++++++++++

Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.





 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (5)
  1. Interesting... the same much much maligned Israeli Government policy paper that bans home charging of electric cars from non-smart home supply also specifically mandates roaming:

    1. The charging supplier shall not constrain its customers from obtaining charging services from charging devices not owned or managed by it.

    2. The licensee shall make open access available to any casual customer or customer of another charging supplier, without discrimination. A charging supplier shall not prevent the owner of an electric vehicle from charging his car at charging devices at its disposal, just because he is not a regular customer, and shall enable casual customers to charge their vehicles on an equal basis.
     
    Post Reply
    -1
    Bad stuff?

  2. Seems like they should all have a simple common "default mode" such as paying the with credit card, or better yet, PayPal.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. I don't get it. Why don't all charging stations just take a credit card. They would be avialable to all electric owners, and maxamize their profits. The first company to come up with this business model will make a fortune...
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

  4. I'll agree with the other posters. The real problem is that the individual charging networks are requiring people to become members. Gas stations don't have this requirement, and don't have this problem. They just take credit/debit cards. Simple.

    Maybe, like gas stations, charging networks could offer increased benefits to members, but still allow non-members to charge, via a credit/debit card. However, by completely disallowing non-members, they are just shooting themselves in their feet. Given the current level of potential customers, this just seems silly.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. Check the video below about the "Treaty of Vaals" where in 7 countries agree on just this subject. Time for the UK to join in.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0HndYQcPSac
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Advertisement

Find Green Cars

Go!

Advertisement

 
© 2013 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC.