2013 Mitsubishi Outlander Plug-in Hybrid...
Volkswagen Golf Blue-e-motion: Prototype Drive...
First BMW i Store Opens in London, i3 Concept...
The state of Kansas is famous for a lot of things, from its wild sunflowers and large wheat-fields through to its miles and miles of straight roads, an incredibly flat landscape, and a certain 1939 musical about a little girl, a tornado, and her dog.
This week however, Kansas became one of the first states in the country to consider taxing electric cars.
Enter Rep. Tom Sloane (R), who argued earlier in the week at a House Energy and Utilities Committee hearing that the state must start taxing electric car drivers. Without a tax, he said, the state’s road and bridge network could suffer.
His reasoning?
Currently, Kansas -- like many other states -- collects funds in the form of a gasoline tax which is levied at the gas station on every gallon of gasoline purchased. Part of this tax is then used to fund new road-building projects, while the rest ensures the state’s existing roads are kept in good order.
If everyone starts driving electric cars, Sloane says, the proceeds of Kansas’ gasoline tax will no-longer be sufficient to maintain and build roads.
Similar concerns have been voiced in other states. But unlike the additional $100 annual electric car license fee that legislators have been battling over in the state of Washington for the past year, Sloane wants electric car drivers to pay “less than 1¢ of tax” for each kilowatt-hour of electricity used to charge their cars.
“I believe that such vehicles should pay the equivalent of the motor fuels tax so that they do not “ride free” when gasoline/diesel vehicles pay to maintain the system,” said Sloane.
In order to do this, Sloane proposes that electric car owners have two electricity meters installed in their homes: one to record domestic power consumption, and one to record electric car power consumption. Electricity used to charge electric cars would then be taxed at a higher rate by the utility companies, with the proceeds passed back to the state.
Although Sloane hasn’t detailed exactly what his sub-1¢ tax rate would be, a 1¢ tax per kilowatt-hour would equate to a 12 percent tax at average Kansas electricity rates, while a 0.5¢ tax would be equivalent to a 6 percent additional tax.
At current gas prices in the state, gasoline is taxed at around 7 percent.
During a hearing on Tuesday, General Motors spokesman Lindsay Douglas informed the House committee that at present, only 24 Chevrolet Volts were registered in the state, arguing that the proposed tax would hamper efforts to support electric vehicle sales in the state.
“If we’re not being shown that there’s backing behind this by the state legislatures, why would we want to continue supporting this technology and pushing forward if what we’re being told is, we’re going to tax this to its death before it gets a chance to survive?” questioned Douglas.
We can't help but agree. With so few electric cars in Kansas at present, it would take many years before electric vehicles were so numerous in the state that the gas-tax proceeds suffered.
While we believe that it is only fair for electric car owners to pay something towards the upkeep of the roads they drive on, we think a yearly flat fee might be more appropriate -- not to mention cheaper to implement than the installation of two electricity meters in every home that has an electric car.
The committee took no action on Sloane’s bill, but doubt remains on whether the bill will proceed past this stage or not.
Until then, all we can do is add Kansas to our increasing list of states considering taxing plug-in vehicle owners.
+++++++++++
Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.
Have an opinion?
Imagine having two outlets in your garage. One is connected to the taxed electricity meter and the other is attached to the untaxed meter. There is no way to police which one you plug into. Also, when you go to grandma's house and plug in, there is no way to collect the tax.
Add to that the additional cost and complexity and I don't think this is the right approach.
Here in Massachusetts there is a required annual inspection (annoying but necessary, I am afraid). During this process they record the car's mileage. That could be transmitted to the state along with the vehicle weight. Then a tax based on mileage and weight could be levied.
Another idea that I have proposed many times is to shift the tax for all vehicles from fuel sales to... tire sales. No matter the drivetrain --gasoline, diesel, electricity, hydrogen, air, flywheel-- all vehicles use tires. More tires and/or more miles driven = more tax. Base the revenue on how much rubber meets the road. Done!
Practically, how do you tax for charging when the vehicle is not at home?
Why not just do it at annual inspection time and integrate it into the price paid for registration and require capturing of miles of the vehicle.
Chevy Volt - the car can use gas but also tracks how many miles are used in EV-mode which could be recorded during registration.
They're doing a lot now with very little. A few dozen to hundred cars are registered in the state. This is a pittance compared to the volume of gas taxes out there. Are they going after Prius owners also who go 50mpg while their neighbor drives a 12mpg pickup truck or 15mpg poorly maintained older car?
Just eliminate the gas tax and tax all vehicles yearly based on mileage and weight for all cars when you renew your tags. Of course you could just register the car in a state that doesn't tax electric cars and you'd be able to avoid the tax altogether.
Or... or... you could privatize roads...
You're not in Kansas any more...
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!