Daimler And BYD To Birth Electric-Car Love Child This Spring

 

Daimler and BYD logos

Daimler and BYD logos

Opposites, it’s said, attract. And automakers don’t come much more opposite than Daimler AG and BYD. Daimler is the parent to such prestigious brands as Maybach and Mercedes-Benz, and is known the world over for building fine and durable automobiles.

BYD, on the other hand, is best known for missing deadlines, delaying launches and, possibly, ignoring patent law. Even in its home market of China, the maker of the Corolla clone F3--China's most popular car--is hardly seen as a desirable brand.

Why, then, would Daimler partner with BYD to deliver co-branded products to the Chinese market? As our own Nikki Gordon-Bloomfield explains, it’s a marriage of necessity; Daimler needs an electric vehicle partner in China, and BYD needs the credibility of a Daimler co-brand.

BYD e6 electric taxi in service in Shenzhen, China

BYD e6 electric taxi in service in Shenzhen, China

Enlarge Photo

According to Daimler CEO Dieter Zetsche, the design of the electric car the companies are working on is now “frozen,” with initial prototypes due next April. That means the joint venture project is on track, although Zetsche admits that the relationship with BYD hasn’t been what it first seemed.

As Zetsche explained to InsideLine, BYD Chairman Wang Chuanfu seemed like a man “who could walk on water--which he can’t.” Zetsche also said that BYD’s “revolutionary” battery technology simply didn’t exist, which forced Mercedes to do most of the development work itself on the pair's upcoming Chinese-market electric car.

Still, Zetsche reiterated, “We’re very confident about this company,” largely due to the support BYD has received from the Chinese government. For now, domestically produced electric vehicles are eligible for a $9,200 subsidy from the Chinese government, which can be backed by another $9,200 subsidy from one of five major Chinese cities.

That currently makes electric cars a low-cost option in China, but there’s evidence to suggest that support for electric-car subsidies in China may be waning. That doesn’t phase Zetsche, who sees the relationship with BYD as a long-term one, saying, “it’s short-sighted to go to China, make money and run.”

While the U.S. won’t see the fruits of Daimler and BYD’s labors, we will see a BYD e6 electric car in the near future. There’s talk that the crossover will cost $35,000 in the U.S. market and offer a 200-mile range, but don’t expect to see such a creature before mid-2012...at the earliest.

+++++++++++

Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.





Posted in:
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (3)
  1. When I read the headline, I was shocked. If Daimler doesn't want its reputation destroyed in China, they had better make all the quality decisions for BYD, in fact they should run the company. Maybe that is just what BYD wants and needs.

    I say that despite my reservations, as when Daimler bought Chrysler and took over its management, Chrysler went straight downhill and Daimler eventually sold at a great loss. And Chrysler had a good reputation if not a stellar sales record. They can't afford a repeat of whatever went wrong with Chrysler to happen with BYD.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. Bit of a shocker that Daimler found that BYD's “revolutionary” battery technology simply doesn’t exist, though people following the BYD soap have long since learned that the company is all about bluff. Daimler and BYD aren't actually that different that way. Ever since Daimler adopted Jurgen Schremp's philosophy "we don't build cars for the third owner anymore" it's attitude towards quality hasn't been that much different from BYD's. The only reason Mercedes vehicles last long is their high residual value which usually warrants the expenses caused by rust problems, electronics problems and general component failure, yet people keep perceiving it as a quality brand. Both companies highly rely on bluff and really deserve each other.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. JD Power Quality rankings for last five years:
    Vehicle Dependability (3-years)
    2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 Average
    Audi: 20 26 12 16 24 20
    Mercedes: 8 9 19 17 13 13
    BMW: 21 21 17 7 7 15
    Initial Quality (three months):
    2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 Average
    Audi: 18 12 20 10 26 17
    Mercedes: 4 3 6 4 5 4
    BMW: 13 16 15 21 21 17
    Not a MB fan myself, but the data seems to show quality improving. We're talking quality rankins that year after year have beaten both German luxury rivals in both surveys.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Find Green Cars

Go!


 
© 2011 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC.