2012 Mitsubishi i Electric Minicar: Drive...
2012 Mitsubishi i Just Wants To Be Normal, Goes...
2012 Mitsubishi i Electric Minicar: Driven
Uh-ho. Those crafty chaps known as the BBC Top Gear team may have thought they got away with their recent review of the 2011 Nissan Leaf and 2011 Peugeot iOn (a rebadged predecessor to the 2012 Mitsubishi i) - but they would be wrong.
The fur started flying yesterday, when Nissan Senior Vice President Andy Palmer gave an interview to The Times newspaper in which he said that the all-electric hatchback had apparently been driven around in loops to force its battery to drain flat, purposely misrepresenting the car.
Now Top Gear executive producer Andy Wilman has responded to the allegations of foul play.
“Our film was a snapshot of living with an electric car. A film is an impression of life. We are allowed to put into a film what we want to”, Wilman is quoted as saying by the Herald Sun. “We can’t cover every base.”
And in a newly released statement on the BBC Top Gear Transmission Blogs, Wilman refutes the accusations from Nissan -- and many electric car fans and Leaf drivers -- that both Leaf and Peugeot iOn were badly represented on the show.
“When we set off, we knew we would have to recharge at some point, because that was an experience we wanted to devote part of the film to,” Wilman writes. “The Leaf is a very good car per se, and there’s nothing wrong with electric motors, but the battery, in our view, remains the Achilles’ heel of the whole package”
While presenter Jeremy Clarkson was mildly positive about the Leaf during his test drive, as soon as it started to run out of charge his demeanor changed dramatically, with a large portion of the review devoted to the time it would take to fully recharge the car on a completely empty battery.
Sounds plausible, right? Not quite. As we found out in May shortly after the film crew was spotted in Lincolnshire, England filming the segment, both cars were purposely left overnight the day before filming without a recharge, starting the film shoot with just 40 miles of range.
As for running out? We’ve confirmed with a Nissan spokesperson that Clarkson’s Leaf was driven to empty, leaving it with just a 1.33% capacity remaining in its battery pack, meaning that the Top Gear team chose to ignore all of Nissan’s audible and visual warnings that the car needed to recharge.
Yes, shocks of all shocks - the Leaf feature was scripted for entertainment purposes.
Again.
But while electric car fans and journalists alike are being urged by the BBC to remember that Top Gear is an entertainment show rather than a factual motoring program, the episode has faced criticism from a completely different group, one with more political clout - handicapped drivers.
During the segment, Messers Clarkson and May pulled into a parking lot to discuss the cars. Unfortunately, they occupied at least three handicapped spaces in the process.
Whoops.
As for the Nissan Leaf? We’re not sure the latest Top Gear episode is anything to worry about. After all, as someone told us earlier this week, “No-one who watches Top Gear and takes what they say seriously would be buying an electric car anyway.”
We think they have a point.
Is it time to ignore Top Gear's electric car verdicts? Tell us your opinion in the Comments below.
Have an opinion?
the problem is due to battey prices, not so much any operational deficiency. He should know that and have addressed the issue in a more intelligent manner.
Even if EV buyers aren't normally watching, someone in the household probably is.
Remember this will fund its way to 300 million viewers in the coming months
Good observation! This is the ideal set up for mass manipulation, and boy did they do a number on the unsuspecting crowd playing into their fear of being stranded, being an early adopter betting on the wrong technology and their fear of batteries based on experience with abused batteries in cheaply produced consumer electronics.
- No Horse Power, but 16 cup holders!!
- Flappy paddle gearbox, Why?!
- An SUV, with two wheel drive, what engineer thought this up?!
In my opinion (and I prefer electrics to gas/diesel cars), the show took the obvious flaws of current electrics (high cost, low range, and long charging time) ... [no standards for charging outlets @ level 1, 2, 3, 4, AC or DC , would be my next choice] ... and showed them in a humorous way.
Just like an old Hummer & a Porsche 911 have obvious flaws (but people still bought them), electric cars definitely have universal flaws that the show would be remiss to skip over.
Yeah, that's just what I thought.
They liked the car and mentioned many positive things about - rightly so. But every car manufacturer should expect the 'bad things' about a car or technology to be aired - like it or not, the truth hurts sometimes.
Thankfully, TG did not do the test in winter, 4 up and in Scotland!
- Rapid charge at Smiths Nissan, Peterborough, en route to Cleethorpes?
- Mention of the announcement by Chargemaster of 4000 charge posts being installed in towns across the UK which would solve the searching issue or indeed the Sat-Nav's ability to pinpoint chargers?
- Discussions of long warranties on EV batteries rather than trying to tar them with this 5 year brush.
- Highlighting of breakthroughs by the likes of MIT in lithium-air technology, which gives energy density of 2500 wh/kg. Put another way, enough to drive a Tesla over 3000 miles on a charge.
- Correction to their previous piece which claimed charging an EV = coal fired power stations. They could have set the record straight on that.
No, a typical day in the life of an EV is going to work/shopping/friends and occasionally embarrassing M3s... again... but that's another story.
When I see that. then I would give them a little credit for being balanced. Until then I really feel they are going out of their way to make electric cars seem like a bad idea.
Minority Rules: Scientists Discover Tipping Point for the Spread of Ideas
So can we unequivocally convince 10% of the people of the benefits of EVs?
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!