Two Things About Electric Cars The Wall Street Journal Missed

 
Follow John

2011 Nissan Leaf

2011 Nissan Leaf

Enlarge Photo

We read a lot of stuff about green cars and, lately, most of it's about electric cars.

Sometimes the coverage is unquestioning and adulatory. More often it's cranky and dismissive. But major media outlets are working hard to understand the complexities of what is a huge, slow, expensive, and very complex transition to another type of vehicle and powertrain.

A piece with yesterday's date in The Wall Street Journal entitled, "Bumpy Road For Electrics," got most of the essential elements right.

Familiar concerns

Writer Mike Ramsey notes that 20-odd electric models will be offered in the U.S. market within three years, and that some manufacturers (Nissan, with its 2011 Leaf all-electric hatchback) are far more optimistic about sales prospects than others (he names Ford, Honda, and Toyota).

He also cites "experts" who reel off a by-now-familiar litany of concerns: "Electric cars are too expensive, take too long to recharge and don't provide enough driving range before they run out of juice to be practical for most Americans."

And he quotes Alex Molinaroli of Johnson Controls Inc., whose research found that "the pool of U.S. customers for whom an electric car makes financial sense—those who travel many miles a year, but on short trips—is very small, about 3 percent of drivers."

2011 Nissan Leaf

2011 Nissan Leaf

Enlarge Photo

Missing global context

Which leads us to the first of our two major criticisms: The article lacks any kind of context to give readers a sense of the likely pace of electric-car rollout. Which, despite those 20 models he cites, is going to be slow.

Specifically, most industry analysts expect pure electric cars to represent at most 2 percent of global production fully 10 years hence, in 2020. Nissan CEO Carlos Ghosn's suggestion that 10 percent of his company's production in 2020 will be electric cars is widely considered an outlier.

The missing context: Even 1 percent of the global market in 2020 might represent 1 million electric cars. And, in that same year, those same analysts expect hybrids to be more than 10 percent--even if they're no longer labeled "hybrid," with all the cultural baggage that name carries.

Almost 1 billion vehicles globally

That's because the world produces about 80 million vehicles a year (roughly 10 million of them in North America), perhaps reaching as high as 100 million by 2020. (There are now about 800 million vehicles on the planet, which some say could rise to as many as 2.5 billion over the next 30 years.)

The auto industry has long lead times (it takes 4-5 years to develop a brand-new car), and new cars are brutally expensive. It will take several iterations of design to make today's costly lithium-ion battery packs affordable enough that electric cars can compete head-to-head on purchase price. (They already win on running costs per mile.)

We wish Ramsey had added that context, since we often hear an assumption that in three to five years, electric cars will be close to dominating the market. And that's wildly unrealistic.

Range anxiety, sure...if you only have one car

A Honda executive, Robert Bienefeld, has experience to back up his assessment: He was involved with Honda's EV Plus electric-car efforts in the late 1990s.

He cites the oft-used "I might not be able to take my kid to the hospital at 2 am" concern over battery electric vehicles with 100 miles of range that may not have recharged. It's known as range anxiety.

Yes and no: First, the average U.S household has more than 2 cars, and no one will make all three battery electrics with limited range. There will likely always be one car with gasoline power for long trips or emergencies. Day to day, families will plan around an EV's range just as they now plan around their cars' carrying capacity and number of seats.






 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (6)
  1. Well, said.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. Negative editorials about EVs ALWAYS conveniently neglect to mention the only 2 factors that count in this transition. 1) Every single ICE power car on the road has the energy efficiency of an incandescent bulb. They convert most (85%) of the energy they consume into waster heat. 2)Because EVs are the inverse in energy efficiency (85% eff) they use 1/10th the energy per mile and as a direct result are 1/10th the cost to run.
    Any debate that doesn't even mention these factors is written by an ignorant or by someone with an anti EV agenda.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. In addition to the savings in 'fuel' costs, there is the maintanance factor to consider. I haven't seen the cost savings projections on things such as oil changes and more long term issues on systems such as electrical, cooling, and fuel. As well as and engine mechanical parts including fewer belts. Of course this might be overshadowed by the expense in replacing the battery pack down the road.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. The range issue, is a big problem. I only have 1 car, and drive 37 miles one way to work. If the electric car only goes 50 miles on a charge, how do I get home? If the car has to charge for 8 hours or more, then that limits how often I can use and when I can use it.
    In addition, not all homes have multiple cars. I have 4 adults in mine, and we have 1 car. Most of my friends and neighbors have 1 car. And most of use work more than 25 miles away from home. So a 50 mile range, and an 8+ hours for charging, doesn't work.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. @ april, Maybe if you read more you would know most electric cars have a 100+ mile range and with the right charger can receive an 80% charge in 15 to 20 minutes. The Volt has an electric range of up to 50 miles, but after the 50 miles the gas generator kicks in you'll get about 300 more miles of driving. So rather than criticizing electric cars read a little more so you can realize that EVs have many positive aspects, and I'm sure if you were really paying attention you would have realized that the Volt would probably work best for you.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. One thing is clear, however, despite all the shortcomings of the article: 1% of all vehicles being electric by 2020 is in no way an acceptable target with the pace of climate change. If we want the environment to turn around quicker, then we as car drivers will have to react quickly to this as well. Clean energy and zero-emission transportation is needed now, not in 20 years time.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Find Green Cars

Go!


 
© 2011 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC.