Tesla Fined $275,000 Over Emissions Regulations

 

2009 Tesla Roadster

2009 Tesla Roadster

Enlarge Photo

With electricity not always generated through renewable methods, it can be hard to claim that an EV is truly zero-emissions. It's generally accepted that you aren't pumping any gasses out the back as you drive along, though. Well, the car shouldn't be anyway...

Despite this, electric vehicle manufacturers are still required to comply with the "Clean Air Act" by supplying the EPA with a "Certificate of Conformity" for their cars. Tesla apparently ignored the memo, and now they're staring down the barrel of a $275,000 fine for non-compliance.

Oddly, the company complied in 2008 but their Securities and Exchange Commission 10-Q filing for the second quarter of 2009 shows that Tesla Motors and the EPA "entered into an Administrative Settlement Agreement and Audit Policy Determination in which we agreed to pay a civil administrative penalty in the sum of $275,000".

Rules are rules, but we can't help feeling like despite Tesla's misdemeanor being easily avoidable, this particular rule is rather ridiculous. It represents bureaucracy of the worst kind, requiring paperwork and expense when the company's sole vehicle should be exempt right from the start.

The situation also makes us wonder though why Tesla Motors chose not to comply with the regulations in the first place, since they were clearly aware of their existence. Surely that $275,000 would have been better spent on developing the 2012 Tesla Model S we're eagerly waiting for, or even lobbying the EPA for exemption from the regulations. This would be of benefit to Tesla and to any other manufacturer intending to supply an electric vehicle.

[Tesla Motors via AutoBlogGreen]





 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
Comments (6)
  1. If a car releases nothing into the air then it is zero-emissions. Tesla shouldn't have to comply. And if you think about it every thing we own and do produces emissions, its unescapable we've setup everything based on technologies that produce harmful emissions. So those who say EVs are not completely emissions free are only trying to slow the progress of EVs down.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. Actually, last week's Transport Evolved touched on the subject in the show. You can hear it at www.transportevolved.com
    Guests: John Voelcker, Michael Thwaite.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. Its halibut
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. at first I was worried but then I realized all they need to do is sell 2 and 3/4 of a roadster to recoup their losses
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. Sorry for the bureaucracy, but OK the Tesla is a Zero-emission car. Suddenly the EVs should "emit" what is needed to make them and their electricity while ICE cars have always been exempted of it, let me laugh at the weak level of intelligence of some public servants.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. This is absolutely sensible.
    Electric motors CAN produce harmful ozone.
    Battery banks CAN produce harmful sulfur and lead vapors.
    Because they CAN cause harmful emissions, electric vehicles must comply with emissions testing.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Find Green Cars

Go!


 
© 2011 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback.
 

Use the form below to send us a tip, give us feedback, or just say hello.

(max 750 characters)