Chevy Volt Beats Nissan LEAF and Tesla Roadster Using MPGe

 
Follow Lyle

2013 Chevrolet Volt SS with aerodynamic wheel covers, conception by artist Rick Feibusch

2013 Chevrolet Volt SS with aerodynamic wheel covers, conception by artist Rick Feibusch

Enlarge Photo

There has been a lot of press lately stemming from GM's announcement that the Chevy Volt would get 230 mpg on city driving and Nissan's follow-up announcement that its LEAF EV would get 367 mpg.

These calculations were made though using very different measurements and technically aren't comparable.  Indeed, this highlights the fact that the rising tide of pure and partial EVs have the potential to render the current MPG determination standards obsolete.  So where do we go from here?

Progressive X Prize is a marketing-neutral organization that is sponsoring a contest that will award $10 million to a company whose vehicle gets more than 100 MPGs.  They are promoting a new measurement system called miles per gallon equivalents (MPGe) which is given by the following formula:

MPGe =  (miles driven) / [(total energy of all fuels consumed)/(energy of one gallon of gasoline)])

This system levels the playing field by converting all energy sources going into powering a car into a common value (energy) and then determines how many gallon-equivalent of gas it takes to propel the car a mile.

It works well for pure EVs like the LEAF or Tesla Roadster but still is hard to apply to the Volt, because it switches energy sources after 40 miles.

According to X Prize senior adviser John Shore to account for that, "you might want to estimate the Volt’s MPGe at the various trip lengths listed in the table on page 36 of the Competition Guidelines – current version available here.   You could then estimate a combined MPGe by taking a weighted average with the distribution weights shown in the table."

The table he refers to is the NHTS statistical distribution of trip lengths driven by US drivers in 2001.

If we do the calculation he recommends and assume the Volt gets 50 MPG in generator mode (GM's initial claim) we get the following results:

Chevrolet Volt:  166 MPGe
Tesla Roadster:  158 MPGe
Nissan LEAF:  142 MPGe

Source (GM-Volt.com)





 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (13)
  1. I wonder if that is the result of gasoline having better energy / weight ration than batteries.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. Why not convert EV efficiency measures into units of "energy of one liter of peanut butter"? Makes about as much sense as "energy of one gallon of gasoline". Then we could compare the efficiency of driving cars with that of riding a bicycle to work.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. Lyle, I don't understand how you got to your conclusion. At the GM 230 MPG media event, GM said, "EPA methodology results show 25 kilowatt hours/100 miles electrical efficiency in city cycle." One gallon of gas has 37 kWh of energy. So in all electric mode, that works out to 148 MPGe. What assumptions did you use to get 166?
    As a scientist, I would prefer we go purely metric and use some 10^x multiple of Joules per meter (J/m). But kWh/mile is likely most practical in this unit challenged country. Certainly we should measure in units of something universal like energy as opposed the volume of some liquid. So MPGe is a small step in the right direction.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. Why would the Volt get 50 MPG in generator mode? If using a generator/electric motor drive train were that efficient wouldn't every car have it's ICE hooked up to an electric motor rather than a mechanical transmission? And how is it possible that a PHEV that uses it's inefficient ICE part of the testcycle gets better MPGe than an all-electric car?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. What worries us more is that the unbeatable GM marketing behemoth is going to take this and run away with it...
    The Electricnick.com team.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. #3 Doug
    Here is the link to their methodology and spreadsheet calculator:
    http://autoblog.xprize.org/axp/2009/08/calculating-mpge.html
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  7. I find it funny no matter what numbers come out, many of you will always cry foul. That is not to say every number posted by companies is legit but please dont try to hide your bias for GM with "factual" commentary.
    What is wrong with using a MPGe? I think that is a very relevant type of system to use and just because you don't like what the number spits out doesn't mean it isn't a good system. Comparing it to peanut butter is just plan ridiculous.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  8. In response to Chris,
    The reason the volt gas engine gets great MPG is because it is not directly linked to the wheels. The motor is not straining to provide power to the wheel, only the battery. Unless you are on a step climb, the motors RPM will be very low. I don't understand how that is hard to grasp.
    Give credit where credit is due, and the Volt surely deserves some.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  9. Lyle, the calculation is wrong.
    You use only 8kwh for Volt (and assumes 40 miles) - not 16kwh. But for Nissan Leaf uses all 24kwh. Obviously Nissan volt use full 100% battery for their 100 miles …
    Pls correct the calculations.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  10. i don't know about you guys!...mpg..mpge...whatever!...i just want an EV with generator built with it...that's all i want. and the VOLT is the answer...
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  11. What would happen if a car went 250 miles on one charge and could recharge in 5 min. What would be the MPG of that?
    I can't believe noone is talking about the company eestor.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  12. newbie:
    Amend. Second the motion.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?


  13. Actually Chris O, thats correct. Its more efficient using the gas to power an electric motor/engine than using it to power a mechanical motor/engine.
    The last century practical every train that is powered by gas in the world, use gas to produce electricity to power an electricity motor/engine.
    Why then we dont get this in every peoples cars? You are pissed, every smart person is pissed, cause we consumers overpay for moving cars the last couple of decades.
    Automakers are the ones to blame, and now they talk about pushing green solutions, give me a break? They only are going "green" cause they get bigger profits and great subsides.
    Its sad that natural balance had showed many times that the car industry is horrible wrong since it was created... from the design, manufacter, financing, sustainability, etc all are so wrong, and even in the last years weak up call, nothing had changed for good.
    Too sad the world, including us, is paying a high price to make a few greedy stupid people rich.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Find Green Cars

Go!


 
© 2011 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC.