
2013 Chevrolet Volt SS with aerodynamic wheel covers, conception by artist Rick Feibusch
Enlarge PhotoThere has been a lot of press lately stemming from GM's announcement that the Chevy Volt would get 230 mpg on city driving and Nissan's follow-up announcement that its LEAF EV would get 367 mpg.
These calculations were made though using very different measurements and technically aren't comparable. Indeed, this highlights the fact that the rising tide of pure and partial EVs have the potential to render the current MPG determination standards obsolete. So where do we go from here?
Progressive X Prize is a marketing-neutral organization that is sponsoring a contest that will award $10 million to a company whose vehicle gets more than 100 MPGs. They are promoting a new measurement system called miles per gallon equivalents (MPGe) which is given by the following formula:
MPGe = (miles driven) / [(total energy of all fuels consumed)/(energy of one gallon of gasoline)])
This system levels the playing field by converting all energy sources going into powering a car into a common value (energy) and then determines how many gallon-equivalent of gas it takes to propel the car a mile.
It works well for pure EVs like the LEAF or Tesla Roadster but still is hard to apply to the Volt, because it switches energy sources after 40 miles.
According to X Prize senior adviser John Shore to account for that, "you might want to estimate the Volt’s MPGe at the various trip lengths listed in the table on page 36 of the Competition Guidelines – current version available here. You could then estimate a combined MPGe by taking a weighted average with the distribution weights shown in the table."
The table he refers to is the NHTS statistical distribution of trip lengths driven by US drivers in 2001.
If we do the calculation he recommends and assume the Volt gets 50 MPG in generator mode (GM's initial claim) we get the following results:
Chevrolet Volt: 166 MPGe
Tesla Roadster: 158 MPGe
Nissan LEAF: 142 MPGe
Source (GM-Volt.com)
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!
By Jason M. Hendler Posted: 8/28/2009 7:14am PDT
By Verde Posted: 8/28/2009 9:00am PDT
By Doug Posted: 8/28/2009 10:35am PDT
As a scientist, I would prefer we go purely metric and use some 10^x multiple of Joules per meter (J/m). But kWh/mile is likely most practical in this unit challenged country. Certainly we should measure in units of something universal like energy as opposed the volume of some liquid. So MPGe is a small step in the right direction.
By Chris O Posted: 8/28/2009 10:56am PDT
By Electricnick Posted: 8/28/2009 2:39pm PDT
The Electricnick.com team.
Here is the link to their methodology and spreadsheet calculator:
http://autoblog.xprize.org/axp/2009/08/calculating-mpge.html
By Jason Posted: 8/28/2009 4:55pm PDT
What is wrong with using a MPGe? I think that is a very relevant type of system to use and just because you don't like what the number spits out doesn't mean it isn't a good system. Comparing it to peanut butter is just plan ridiculous.
By Jason Posted: 8/28/2009 4:59pm PDT
The reason the volt gas engine gets great MPG is because it is not directly linked to the wheels. The motor is not straining to provide power to the wheel, only the battery. Unless you are on a step climb, the motors RPM will be very low. I don't understand how that is hard to grasp.
Give credit where credit is due, and the Volt surely deserves some.
By EVNow Posted: 8/28/2009 11:15pm PDT
You use only 8kwh for Volt (and assumes 40 miles) - not 16kwh. But for Nissan Leaf uses all 24kwh. Obviously Nissan volt use full 100% battery for their 100 miles …
Pls correct the calculations.
By newbie Posted: 8/28/2009 11:30pm PDT
By r embrey Posted: 8/29/2009 9:03am PDT
I can't believe noone is talking about the company eestor.
By Noel Park Posted: 8/29/2009 11:24am PDT
Amend. Second the motion.
By luisgoru Posted: 9/18/2009 9:39pm PDT
Actually Chris O, thats correct. Its more efficient using the gas to power an electric motor/engine than using it to power a mechanical motor/engine.
The last century practical every train that is powered by gas in the world, use gas to produce electricity to power an electricity motor/engine.
Why then we dont get this in every peoples cars? You are pissed, every smart person is pissed, cause we consumers overpay for moving cars the last couple of decades.
Automakers are the ones to blame, and now they talk about pushing green solutions, give me a break? They only are going "green" cause they get bigger profits and great subsides.
Its sad that natural balance had showed many times that the car industry is horrible wrong since it was created... from the design, manufacter, financing, sustainability, etc all are so wrong, and even in the last years weak up call, nothing had changed for good.
Too sad the world, including us, is paying a high price to make a few greedy stupid people rich.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!