Advertisement

University Of Michigan Solar Car Takes Sun Power To New Extremes

Follow Antony

If you want to know why road-going electric vehicles aren't powered by solar panels mounted on the roof, here's your answer.

Technically it's feasible, but you'd have to do without amenities, comfort, performance, or indeed a vehicle which doesn't look like an asymmetric air hockey table.

The air hockey table you see here is the University of Michigan's (U-M) entry into the 2013 World Solar Challenge--an 1,800-mile, week-long endurance race across the arid innards of the Australian subcontinent.

As well as energy efficiency from the huge slab of solar panels on the vehicle's surface, wind and tire resistance--and keeping them to a minimum--are of utmost importance.

In fact, contrary to initial expectations, it's why the U-M's entrant displays its strange, asymmetric shape.

The latest rule for World Solar Challenge entries has seen a fourth wheel added to the formula. Teams aren't allowed to run these wheels side-by-side, replicating a three-wheel design, so instead they run them in-line, like a regular car. But it does pose a challenge for where to put the driver--to minimize their effect on aerodynamic drag.

Previously, the driver's "butt bucket" (seriously, that's where the driver sits...) was in the same fairing as the front, individual wheel.

Putting the butt bucket in the middle of the car--the most logical place--would add another bump to the vehicle's slippery surface. So instead, the best option is to put the driver between one of the front and rear pairs of wheels. In this instance, the driver and two wheels are located within one fairing on one side of the car, and each wheel on the other side of the car has its own aerodynamic shroud.

Unusual it may seem, but it's a clever way around the problem, and to ensure the vehicle's weight is evenly distributed, the car's electronics and other systems are located on the other side, balancing out the weight.

UPDATE: As our reader Warren Eldberg points out, this is hardly a new design--have been used in the 1955 Bisiluro Damolnar Le Mans race car, among others.

There are other benefits, too: "The design also reduces shading of the solar cells by placing the canopy to the side", explains Eric Hausman, team project manager and senior in industrial and operations engineering at U-M.

While the team admits cars just like its entrant are unlikely to appear on our roads soon, U-M's links with relevant industries and companies (sponsors include GM, Ford, Qatar Airways and Siemens) mean lessons the team learns could have practical applications further down the line.

With five third-place finishes to its name--as well as seven North American solar challenge victories--U-M will be hoping it walks away with the top prize this year. We wish them the best of luck--and you can follow their progress on the team's website.

The World Solar Challenge runs from 6-13 October this year, from Darwin to Adelaide.

_______________________________________________________

Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and Google+

Advertisement
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (5)
  1. "Technically it's feasible, but you'd have to do without amenities, comfort, performance, or indeed a vehicle which doesn't look like an asymmetric air hockey table."

    Actually, it has been "proven" year after year, it is NOT possible. Not for the speed requirement, not for the comfort requirement and any of the safety or cost requirement...

    I was on the project when I was in the college. After about 2 years in the program. I figured it out that there are just NOT enough surface area for those cars to be "practical". Will it work on a single person "suffering" machine? Yes. Will it ever work for a family sedan that needs basic comfort and safety? ABSOLUTELY NOT!

    Remember this, the Solar limit is 1KW power per square meter.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

     
  2. And Solar cells 20% efficient at best.

    1KW per meter squared is ONLY the best case where the air is clear, at sea level and 90 degree angle.

    1KW is about 1.33 HP. So, your best chance ever is 1.33HP per square meter and electric drive train are best 90% efficient for the entire system on a smooth power delivery. So, you are lucky to 1.2 HP per sq meter.

    With the existing solar panels (20% efficiency), you will be lucky to get 1.2HP per 5 square meter...
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

     
  3. @Li: What about solar charging a battery pack that propels an EV?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

     
  4. That is fine and highly recommended.

    You can have a much larger surface area and providing shade for the car while it is parked. It makes perfect sense for work place and home parking places. In fact, all public shopping center parking and open work parking places should have carport cover made of solar panels...
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. "Previously, the driver's "butt bucket" (seriously, that's where the driver sits...) was in the same fairing as the front, individual wheel."

    This is an error. Most 3-wheeled solar car designs have two front wheels and one rear wheel. The last U Michigan car used the rear wheel for the butt bucket. Of course some teams do use the single front wheel. And some designs are delightfully wacky. http://sunlake.org/solar/archaeology/archaeology_j/museum/solaemon/solaemon.htm
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion? Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Advertisement

Find Green Cars

Go!

Advertisement

 
© 2014 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by izmo, Inc.