Advertisement

A123 Electric Car Battery Plants Saved From Bankruptcy By Auto-Parts Maker

Follow Nikki

Lithium Ion Phosphate Auto Battery cell

Lithium Ion Phosphate Auto Battery cell

Despite filing for bankruptcy protection yesterday, lithium-ion battery firm A123 Systems has said the factories where it makes electric car battery cells will be saved, thanks to a $125 million deal with automotive parts maker Johnson Controls. 

Already a huge Tier One global automotive parts supplier, Johnson Controls sells around 120 million lead-acid starter batteries a year to the automotive industry, as well as everything from instrument panels and information displays to headliners and floor consoles.

The purchase of A123 Systems’ automotive business by Johnson Controls will not only give the auto-parts maker the chance to build and sell lithium-ion batteries to automakers, but hopes to safeguard two of A123 System’s battery facilities in the U.S. 

Alongside the two U.S. factories--located in Livonia and Romulus, Michigan--the deal will also see Johnson Controls obtain A123’s cathode powder plant in China, as well as equity interest in a joint venture with Shanghai Automotive Industry Corp.

In addition to the $125 million acquisition, Johnson Controls will provide A123 Systems with $72.5 million to continue its operations at those two battery facilities, ensuring production of electric car batteries can continue. 

Back in 2009, A123 Systems was awarded a $249 Million grant by the U.S. Government under the Recovery Act of 2009.

A123 Systems Employees Perform Quality Check on a Lithium-Ion Battery Pack [source: A123 Systems]

A123 Systems Employees Perform Quality Check on a Lithium-Ion Battery Pack [source: A123 Systems]

Enlarge Photo

The money--which had to be matched dollar for dollar by private A123 investment--was granted to A123 Systems to help create jobs, support the economy, and bring large-scale automotive lithium ion battery pack manufacturing to the U.S. for the first time.

Up to the moment of its bankruptcy filing, A123 Systems had used just $123 million of the available grant money. 

Just to be clear, unlike the low-interest loans made available to automakers like Ford, Nissan, General Motors and Tesla Motors under the Department of Energy’s Advanced Technology Vehicle Manufacturing Program, the money made available to A123 Systems was a grant, not a loan. 

This means the $123 million used by the firm so far--plus $6 million granted to it by the Bush Administration--has, and never will, require repayment.

“A123, which has been building batteries for electric vehicles as well as the nation’s power grid, quickly established itself as an innovative player in the market,” wrote Dan Leistikow, Director of the Office of Public Affairs at the Department of Energy, in a formal response to the news

“Today’s news means that A123’s manufacturing facilities and technology will continue to be a vital part of America’s advanced battery industry,” he continued.

Perhaps most importantly, however, Johnson Controls’ acquisition of A123 Systems’ automotive arm means that A123’s clients--including Fisker Automotive, BMW, and General Motors--will be able to continue  planned production without delays. 

This means GM’s all-electric car project, the all-electric Chevrolet Spark, will not be delayed. 

+++++++++++

Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.

Advertisement
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (13)
  1. That is great news. It is good to see all this hard work not be flushed down the drain. Hope Johnson Controls can whip this in to shape.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. It's good to know that the progress A123 has made won't be lost. And that the company who purchased them is interested in advancing battery technology. A123's bankruptcy could have hurt development of EVs from their major clients, so the fact that they were picked up so quickly is a big relief.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. Wow what a relief, for a minute I thought it was going to be another Obama green company flushing another quarter billion tax payers money down the toilet. Wait a minute it was! Gee, maybe Mitt was right.
     
    Post Reply
    -2
    Bad stuff?

     
  4. but Mitt was WRONG!
     
    Post Reply
    0
    Bad stuff?

     
  5. @Tan: No his point was correct, it was probably over your head. Fisher is in its death bed and Tesla is only surviving because its backed by " evil" billionaires, according to our president.
     
    Post Reply
    0
    Bad stuff?

     
  6. Is the plant in Michigan still making batteries with American workers (under JCI)? If yes moot point.
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

  7. Mitt isn't right, besides you never really know what he's going to say because you never know if he's going to flip, or flop.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

     
  8. @CD: Mitt does not flip or flop, it is the bias news media saying he does because it is over their heads like yours!
     
    Post Reply
    -1
    Bad stuff?

     
  9. Stop insulting other posters.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  10. @Pat, @CDspeed: This is your friendly site moderator here.

    Let's keep it polite, civil, and confined to the facts--rather than insulting other commenters (that's you, Pat).

    We try to be polite and respectful here, even to those whose views we disagree with. And links to supporting data are ALWAYS a plus when disputing someone else's point.

    We're all interested in green cars, though we may disagree on which cars work best in which circumstances. In other words: Please play nice.

    And no comments about "he started it" either! :)
     
    Post Reply
    +1
    Bad stuff?

     
  11. @John: I do not insult other commentators, I try to point out their flawed thinking. If you look, I comment on their insulting comments. Speaking of which, tell Li I have Engineering degrees in Electrical and Nuclear so a GED is kind of redundant! But I guess his comment was not insulting.
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  12. Pat, please learn to write. I think 30 consecutive misspellings of "biased" is enough. Again, if you want to insult people, at least spell the words correctly. Biased news media, biased scientists, biased judges, etc... I'm sure you can learn to use your favorite word correctly from now on...

    But what would I know, I'm just BIASED...
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

     
  13. @ro2: My spelling of bias is correct. What is wrong is its use. You being an English teacher should have known that, but boy we need to work on your math skills! 30 times, really!
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion? Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Advertisement

Find Green Cars

Go!

Advertisement

 
© 2014 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by izmo, Inc.