2013 Ford Escape Pricing Released, Sort Of
2013 Ford Escape Crossover Will Boost Gas...
2013 Ford Escape With EcoBoost: On Its Way To...
2013 Ford Escape 2.0-Liter EcoBoost: Gas...
Ford’s all-new 2013 Escape compact crossover may have only been on sale for a few months, but it is already proving a strong seller at Ford dealerships across the U.S.
On paper, there’s little difference between the gas mileage figures of the entry-level 2.5-liter, four-cylinder Ford Escape S and the more efficient 1.6-liter EcoBoost engine offered as standard on the Escape SE and Escape SEL.
Costing $2,600 less than the Escape SE, losing just 2 mpg combined in gas mileage might make the Escape S seem like the best choice, but when it comes picking the right Escape for you, it’s important to look beyond gas mileage figures.
Less power
Because it uses an older, 2.5-liter, four-cylinder, naturally aspirated Duratec engine, the Escape S produces 168 horsepower.
That’s less than the 178 horsepower quoted for the 1.6-liter, four-cylinder, turbocharged EcoBoost engine offered as standard on the Escape SE and SEL. It's much less than the 240 horsepower quoted for the 2.0-liter, four-cylinder, turbocharged EcoBoost engine offered as an option on the Escape SEL and standard on the Escape Titanium.
It’s also worth noting that both the EcoBoost engines produce peak power at a much lower engine speed, making them less stressed and more refined at higher speeds than the 2.5-liter engine found in the Escape S.
Less torque
More importantly for those wanting to tow or carry large loads, the 2.5-liter Escape S produces far less torque than either the 1.6-liter or 2.0-liter EcoBoost Escapes.
At just 170 foot-pounds of torque, the Escape S can’t match the 184 foot-pounds and 270 foot-pounds offered by either of its EcoBoost engine options.
There’s also a difference between how the EcoBoost and no-EcoBoost engines deliver that torque.
In both EcoBoost engines, maximum torque is delivered around 2,500-3,000 rpm. In the 2.5-liter Duratec, peak torque is delivered at 4,500 rpm.
If you were to compare the Escape S and Escape SE side-by-side, pulling the same load, you’d find the SE both quicker from a standing start, and less stressed to match.
What’s your use?
If you’re just looking to buy a compact crossover to use around town and carry out light-duties like taking the kids to the weekly football practice, the 2013 Escape S might be the car for you.
After all, at $2,600 less, the Escape S more than compensates for the slightly worse gas mileage.
If you want to tow, carry heavy loads, or plan to use your Escape for longer-distance trips, the benefits of the EcoBoost engine are really worth the extra money.
Remember, while the 1.6-liter EcoBoost and 2.0-liter EcoBoost models are offered with optional all-wheel drive, it will diminish your gas mileage slightly over an identically-engined, front-wheel drive models.
While a good option for those who tow a lot -- and need the extra 500 pounds offered by the optional Class II tow package -- the Escape Titanium or optional 2.0-liter Escape SEL won’t reward you with the same gas mileage figures as the 1.6-liter Escape SE and SEL.
For us, the 2013 Escape SE and SEL offer the best value for money, combining good gas mileage and enough power to tow when you really need to.
Ultimately, the choice is down to you, but remember to take some time to figure out which engine option really offers you the best mix of power and economy before you judge the Escape lineup on gas mileage alone.
We think you’ll thank yourself in the future if you do.
+++++++++++
Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.
Have an opinion?
RIP, 2012 Escape hybrid, $1750 in fuel annually.
Is it a green website here or just another disguided gasoline sale outlet.
Except there isn't one.
Or the EV SUV with Class II towing capability. Oops, yeah, not one available yet.
OK, how about the BEV crossover that can be purchased anywhere in N. America, fully loaded with a sticker under $40k.
Nope.
But still, they should've done an EV article instead.
I'm sorry to hear the article didn't meet with your expectations. However, it's worth remembering that GCR is a site which covers all types of fuels and green cars.
For what it is, a compact crossover SUV, the 2013 Ford Escape is a greener car within its class.
As part of our site, we try to cover as many different fuel types and car classes as possible. Sometimes that includes writing articles about regular gasoline cars with cleaner, greener engines than their predecessors.
While we do cover electric and plug-in cars too, it's also worth remembering that most consumers haven't made the switch to electric.
We try to provide content for them too.
Or you could throw all these hippies a softball and write the 1000th story about the Model S. Have they sold 100 yet?
Please carry on!!
All forgiven! No offence taken. As is often the case, satire doesn't always work in written language :)
One of the brand new Ford Escape with Ecoboost showed up in my work place with that lime green color paint. Its dual exhaust tip (one on each side below the rear bumper) are covered in "black sooty powders". Those are usually the "unburned" Carbon deposits from a ICE engine especially when it is either burning oil or burning gas inefficiently (usually too rich).
That is shocking to me. Considering how new this vehicle is and how "clean" the Ford has claimed the "Ecoboost" are...
All the Volt and Prius exhaust pipe are totally clean. No signs of any black stuff. Even the Dodge Ram Diesel (Mercedez designed) exhaust pipe are clean...
Hybrid such as Prius has its engine frequently on/off, so it has to maintaince emission regardless of temperature of the engine. The Pip and Volt has to meet the CA AT-PZEV...
The Ford diesel (6.0L Powerstroke) on the other hand are dirty in the pipes...
My friend's RAM (previous generation with Mercedez diesel) has this injection port and he has to get it filled periodically. He explains to me that it is the same design as the MB's Bluetec while Benz owned Chrysler... Anyway, that pipe was surprisingly clean...
I wonder if the black stuff have anything to do with the Turbo and its "lubrication". From what I understand Turbo will always burn a tiny bit of engine oil...
Anyway, I was just surprised about that. I will keep an eye out. There are few F-150 Eco Boost in the lot too. Maybe I will go and check out their pipes too...
http://www.fordforum.com/forum/general-tech-11/black-soot-tailpipe-27468/
My new 2.0l EcoBoost AWD Escape will be in my hands this month some time; I'll keep a lookout on the exhaust, but I don't expect any issues. This is the same engine used in other Ford applications as well as Land Rover and now Jaguar.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!