2012 Toyota Prius C So Popular In Japan, Toyota...
2012 Toyota Prius V, Prius C, Help Toyota Top 4...
Take One Toyota Prius, Make Less Aerodynamic...
Toyota's fourth-generation Prius hybrid, expected in around 2015, has a tough act to follow.
Still among the most economical vehicles on the market, the third-generation Prius has taken the internal combustion engine to new levels of efficiency--and the new Prius will have to beat it.
To ensure the next-gen Prius is worthy of the badge, Toyota is aiming to make improvements in tire rolling resistance, aerodynamics, and weight savings.
According to Inside Line, sources at Toyota have revealed the company is in talks with tire manufacturers to work on an ultra-low rolling resistance tire for the next Prius, helping it slip along the road even more easily than the current model.
Weight savings will play a key part too, though the company has apparently scrapped the idea of an aluminum body due to high investment costs. Instead, Toyota is likely to make more efficient use of high-strength steel and reduce the thickness of non-structural areas to save weight. However, aluminum may still be used for the hood--just as it is on the 2012 Toyota Prius V.
Toyota will also improve the aerodynamics, possibly taking a lead from the FT-Bh concept shown at this year's Geneva Motor Show.
The concept had a drag coefficient of only 0.235, the result of dramatic moldings and curves to let air slip cleanly by. A production Prius won't be quite so eye-catching, but we'd not be surprised to see some inspiration from the FT-Bh.
There are no clues just yet as to what will power the next Prius, but expect to see some improvements there too.
With improvements all around, will the 2015 Prius be a 60 mpg car? We'll have to wait and see...
+++++++++++
Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.
Have an opinion?
60 mpg is a realistic target for a non plug-in version of the next Prius, given modern safety regulations, space requirements and so-on, and without carrying too much weight in batteries.
When I drive the Prius, I get between between 37mpg-42mpg which is nowhere near the EPA rating.
The Plug-in Prius is even worse. I can't even stay in EV mode with my normal style (unlike typical Prius slow driving style). EPA should have rated it 2 miles electric instead of 6 miles electric range.
Plug-ins are a different matter altogether. I see Toyota making the new Prius better cause they can and it is their green flagship vehicle. Apparently the Prius spin offs are doing well too. Prius family sales are likely to increase within the next few years.
Still, let's not let facts get in the way of an anti-Prius bias, eh?
I had a factual response ready to challenge Xiaolong Li but it no longer seems relevant.
If Prius is gettin faster, their drivers certainly do NOT show its "improved" performance on ANY HIGHWAY entrance ramp. Just come for a brief visit in California, EVERY highway entrance ramp is pretty much held up with a Prius in front of 5-7 cars...
Driving that doesn't meet your own personal standards does not mean the car itself is below par. And I've been to California. *Many* people drive poorly (same as anywhere, really), not just Prius drivers.
If it is designed to save gas, then why the combined system supposes to have more "power"? Why don't Toyota step up and make a "real" plug-in car similar to Volt that can stay in EV mode for real?
Prius seem to be pretty "high" on themselves just b/c they drive a Prius...
The PiP is about $10,000 cheaper (tax credits aside) than the Chevy Volt. That is why Toyota didn't make this a "real" Plug-in. It is the money.
Additionally, PiP Owners are getting 30% of their miles on electricity versus 60-70% for Volt owners. Not too shabby.
Get a clue! Your personal experience does not apply to all.
MrEnergyCzar
2001 41 mpg
2004 46 mpg 11%
2010 50 mpg 8%
so perhaps we can expect 55 mpg in 2016 based on this trend.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!