Advertisement

2013 Mazda CX-5 & 2012 Mazda3: Real-World Gas Mileage Boost From SkyActiv Engine

Follow John

The trend is clear: To get higher gas mileage, almost all new cars will have smaller, more efficient engines.

Mazda says its new line of SkyActiv engines and transmissions, though, takes the carmaker to new heights of fuel efficiency.

We recently tested two different Mazdas fitted with its SkyActiv-G 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine and six-speed automatic transmission, and we can report: They get vastly better gas mileage than we expected.

Five weeks ago, we had a 2013 Mazda CX-5 compact crossover. This was a vehicle we liked when it was launched, and though we discovered a few more quibbles over a long weekend, we remain fans of its looks, handling, and packaging.

The CX-5 is the first vehicle Mazda has designed from scratch around its SkyActiv powertrain, and there's sufficient space behind the transverse engine for the lengthy and complex intertwined exhaust manifold and outflow pipes.

Last weekend's car was a 2012 Mazda Mazda3 Grand Touring SkyActiv-G compact four-door sedan. This is a mid-cycle update that swaps in the 2.0-liter SkyActiv four and six-speed automatic to replace the previous 2.0-liter four--a totally different engine--that was paired with an old five-speed automatic.

So how'd each car do on gas mileage? Quite well, thank you.

2012 Mazda Mazda3 Grand Touring SkyActiv-G sedan road test, April 2012

2012 Mazda Mazda3 Grand Touring SkyActiv-G sedan road test, April 2012

Enlarge Photo

Over our usual driving cycle route of roughly 260 miles, which is about two-thirds highway and one-third local, the CX-5 averaged an astounding 33.1 miles per gallon.

Not only does that beat the CX-5's EPA combined rating of 28 mpg for the automatic version with all-wheel drive, but it's higher than any other compact crossover we've driven--including the late lamented Ford Escape Hybrid.

And the Mazda3 delivered 38.1 mpg over almost exactly the same test route. (The photo below was taken just before a long spell of Manhattan traffic knocked a couple of tenths off our cumulative average.)

That too is higher than its EPA combined rating of 33 mpg, and a very good figure for a compact sedan. The previous figure for the old engine and transmission was a combined 28 mpg.

2012 Mazda Mazda3 Grand Touring SkyActiv-G sedan road test, April 2012

2012 Mazda Mazda3 Grand Touring SkyActiv-G sedan road test, April 2012

Enlarge Photo

For example, our 2012 Hyundai Elantra returned 34.1 mpg and the 2011 Chevrolet Cruze Eco we tested gave us 34.4 mpg, although with the six-speed manual transmission, which most owners won't order. 

A few notes on driving style: We use cruise control when possible if traveling on uncrowded freeways (we won't say at what speeds, ahem). Otherwise, both Mazdas were driven fairly "normally" with occasional bursts of speed, hard cornering, and general performance driving.

At the CX-5 launch last fall, one Mazda executive had said that the company thought its buyers' real-world results would be notably better than the EPA combined ratings.

Based on two cars over the same test route--albeit in hardly a scientific study--we suspect they're right.

Any owners of Mazda3s (with the new SkyActiv-G engine) or CX-5 drivers out there to give us real-world feedback?

Leave us your thoughts in the Comments below.

+++++++++++

Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.

Advertisement
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (8)
  1. CX-5 looks very nice in this summary review.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. I have a 2012 Mazda 3 with the Skyactive engine. I exceed official EPA mileage for the highway (39mpg) all the time, getting anywhere from 40 t0 46! This makes me feel infinately more confidant than Honda Fit buyers, many of whom are involved in a messy class action lawsuit against Honda for misrepresenting mileage in their ads. Lets hope the good news about Skyactive helps Mazda dig themselves out of their current financial nightmare.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

     
  3. @Jeffrey: Honda Fit, or Honda Civic Hybrid? I'm aware of the lawsuit around gas-mileage claims for the latter, but not the former.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. Have only had my CX-5 (Touring) for about a month, but I do get better mileage than the EPA estimates. My commute is mixed - stop and go with traffic lights in the morning and highway headed home (although 5miles of stop and go once off the highway). I've been getting over 32 mpg mixed. I'm pretty impressed!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. I'm at 5500 miles with my CX-5 (with one oil change done) and I have to say I am a bit disappointed. I'm only getting about 28 mpg on the highway. I'm not an overly aggressive driver and I don't understand what the issue is.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

     
  6. @Jordan: That's actually quite surprising, as all of us at High Gear Media have remarked on the good real-world mileage of the SkyActiv Mazdas. I do have to ask, though, is that highway mileage of 28 mpg measured at 65 mph or 80 mph? The energy required to increase average speed above 40 mph is not linear but exponential (or close), due to aerodynamic drag. We mostly stayed below 75 mph to get that measurement above. What speed do you drive at? (And what altitude do you live at?)
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

     
  7. My CX5 is averaging 26.6 mpg after 2700 miles. We live at 2000 feet altitude which might account for the lower than expected mileage. Having read many reviews before buying we expected better mpg. Also, passing slower traffic uphill is a real drag. Disappointing.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  8. Unfortunately I am getting nowhere near the mpg all of the reviews state.
    combined city/highway about 26mpg. Tires are fine, I don't have a heavy foot (my kids ask if I am driving to Denny's) and no service lights. I am at 1300 miles so engine clearly should be broken in. I have serious buyers remorse.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion? Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Advertisement

Get FREE Dealer Quotes

From dealers near you
Go!

Find Green Cars

Go!

Advertisement

 
© 2014 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by izmo, Inc.
Advertisement