Advertisement

2013 Mazda CX-5 Kicks Compact Crossover Gas Mileage Higher

Follow John

2013 Mazda CX-5 compact crossover on test drive, Southern California, Nov 2011

2013 Mazda CX-5 compact crossover on test drive, Southern California, Nov 2011

Enlarge Photo

Let's face it: If you want the best gas mileage in a compact or mid-size all-wheel drive crossover, you have to go hybrid.

But hybrids are still more expensive than gasoline models by a few thousand dollars, and the majority of buyers prioritize price over those last few miles per gallon.

So the new 2013 Mazda CX-5 promises to raise the bar for gas mileage in the compact crossover segment.

At its introductory event in Los Angeles last week, Mazda projected the following ratings (although the EPA hasn't formally weighed in yet):

  • Front-wheel drive, six-speed manual: 26 mpg city, 33 mpg highway
  • Front-wheel drive, six-speed automatic: 26 mpg city, 32 mpg highway
  • All-wheel drive, six-speed automatic: 25 mpg city, 30 mpg highway

Achieving EPA ratings in the real world

Those will likely produce combined ratings of 27 to 29 mpg depending on model. And Mazda says confidently that its test show the 2013 CX-5 consistently achieves the combined figure, unlike certain other makers, whose cars routinely fail to match their EPA fuel economy ratings in actual use.

In a real-world first drive that covered 140 miles, we got 24.6 mpg climbing up into the hills around Los Angeles, and an impressive 30.3 mpg coming back down, in an all-wheel drive model. So we think Mazda's claim may well hold up, though we'll reserve judgment until we do a longer road test sometime early next year.

2013 Mazda CX-5 compact crossover on test drive, Southern California, Nov 2011

2013 Mazda CX-5 compact crossover on test drive, Southern California, Nov 2011

Enlarge Photo

Gasoline now, diesel next year?

The sole engine used in the 2013 Mazda CX-5 is a 2.0-liter four-cylinder that's the first of the company's new line of SkyActiv engines, which use a very high combustion ratio--13:1 in the U.S. market--and specially tuned exhaust routing, among other techniques, to extract maximum efficiency from each gallon of gasoline.

SkyActiv technology will also spawn a closely related 2.2-liter diesel engine, which will likely launch in the 2014 CX-5, though Mazda is remaining coy about exactly which models will offer the clean diesel option first.

But the diesel will likely kick fuel economy even higher, perhaps leading to the first compact crossover with combined gas-mileage ratings around 35 mpg.

Excellent handling, spacious cabin

We found the CX-5 a delight to drive, with neutral steering, handling, acceleration, and braking. It's definitely the driver's option among compact crossovers--though, to be fair, we haven't driven the all-new 2013 Ford Escape yet.

Mazda claims the load bay is the largest in the class, and we were able to fit four six-foot adults comfortably into the five seats. The interior is straightforward and frontal visibility is particularly good, although the view out the rear quarters is lousy--making the reversing camera almost a mandatory option.

2013 Mazda CX-5 compact crossover on test drive, Southern California, Nov 2011

2013 Mazda CX-5 compact crossover on test drive, Southern California, Nov 2011

Enlarge Photo

Higher than CR-V, waiting for Ford

Ford hasn't yet said what it expects for 2013 Escape gas-mileage ratings, though like the CX-5, the new Escape won't offer a V-6 option. Instead, it will offer a base 2.5-liter four, plus both 1.6-liter and 2.0-liter EcoBoost direct-injected and turbocharged fours.

The 1.6-liter is likely to be the fuel economy champ for the new Escape line, and Ford has said it will have highway fuel economy as much as 5 mpg higher than the best Escape now, which is the 2012 Escape Hybrid--meaning its highway rating could be 36 mpg.

Meanwhile, the new 2012 Honda CR-V is rated at 23 mpg city, 31 mpg highway, and a combined 26 mpg for its front-wheel drive model--a couple of miles per gallon below the 2013 Mazda CX-5.

On sale in February

Compact crossovers are among the hottest segments of the auto market these days, and the competition for gas-mileage laurels promises to get even more intense.

Meanwhile, the 2013 Mazda CX-5 is a fun-to-drive, spacious, and practical new entry that's worth comparing to the volume entries: Ford Escape, Honda CR-V, and Toyota RAV4.

It goes on sale in mid-February, but Mazda hasn't yet released final pricing.

+++++++++++

Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.

Advertisement
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (4)
  1. At 26/33 mpg really makes you question assumptions about which vehicles are fuel efficient.

    Let's compare with the 2012 Honda civic at 28/39 mpg, the civic is only 7% better in the city than the CX-5 means they are almost the same in my book. On the highway, the Civic is 18% better than the CX-5 no doubt due to smaller frontal area and lower drag coefficient.

    Of course the civic hybrid at 44/44 mpg is a dramatic improvement and a clear winner for city driving.

    But if cross-overs start having these kinds of fuel efficiency, we may need to reconsider who the real gas hogs are.
     
    Post Reply
    -2
    Bad stuff?

  2. The new language is miles per dollar. This gets only 8 miles per dollar at best. Prius is 14 mpd, my volt gets 100 mpd (solar powered though), typical volt gets 20-25 miles per dollar... the Volt crossover in the future should be the same size as this Mazda...

    MrEnergyCzar
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. Really not that impressed, to be honest. Far worse looking than the CX-7 it replaces and only slightly better mileage than others in its class that don't use some of this technology but will have it in the next releases in a year or two. Same HW mileage as the Equinox, but 18% better in the city, so slightly better, but I expect the new Escape/Fuga to do much better. It's also much better looking, although that's obviously just my opinion.
    A disappointing look for me, personally, from a brand that usually has great designs.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. Sorry, I meant far worse looking than the CX-5 it replaces, which I really like, both for looks and driving. I also still can't figure out why everything I post posts twice. Sorry again (sorry again...)
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion? Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Advertisement

Get FREE Dealer Quotes

From dealers near you
Go!

Find Green Cars

Go!

Advertisement

 
© 2014 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by izmo, Inc.
Advertisement