Better Place Launches Battery-Swap Test In Four...
2013 Nissan Leaf Electric Car Revealed In...
2011 Nissan Leaf Tested On An Island Amongst...
What Range Anxiety? Daihatsu EV Does 623 Miles...
Mazda To Offer All-Electric Mazda2, In Japan...
March 11, 2011 changed Japan forever. Just before 3pm local time, a magnitude 9 earthquake created a Tsunami that devastated a large region of the Eastern coast of Japan, killing thousands.
It also triggered meltdowns in the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, causing explosions in three reactors, with the surrounding area now likely to be contaminated for decades.
Such instances are rare, but the disaster turned the tide of opinion against nuclear power in Japan. It may also have shifted customers' opinions of electric cars, reports Detroit News.
As zero local emissions vehicles, electric cars are immediately cleaner than internal combustion vehicles. However, they typically rely on power stations to generate the electricity they use. The cleanliness of this varies depending on how the power is being generated.
Renewable sources like solar, wind and hydro are ideal, and many would say idealistic. Coal, gas and oil, as fossil fuels, aren't so good. Nuclear is a compromize that many accept, with the generation being essentially clean, but with dubious longer-term issues.
In the event of a catastrophe rendering some of your country uninhabitable, even the short-term benefits of nuclear power become moot. The Japanese government had intended to increase nuclear power from a third of Japan's energy mix, to a half.
The image of electric cars has become a further casualty of the disaster. With Japan currently relying mostly on fossil fuels for electricity generation, their green image has suffered. Now that nuclear also has a tainted image, even EVs run on nuclear-generated electricity have an unfortunate association in the country.
Ryuichi Kino, an author who has written books on nuclear power and hybrid technology, told Detroit News that if nuclear remains a key power source, "then the green image of the electric car will get bashed to bits, maybe to the extent it will be irreparable."
Sales of electric cars have still been relatively impressive in Japan. Nissan has sold 12,000 Leafs in the country since its launch in late 2010. Compare that with the 10,000 sold in the U.S. since launch, despite a population over twice that of Japan.
That's clearly illustrative of Japan's suitability to support an electric car network, but while the country finds its feet in the years following the Tōhoku earthquake and Fukushima disasters, the rise of electric cars may be a little slower than manufacturers were hoping.
+++++++++++
Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.
Have an opinion?
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2110307,00.html
Japan has the opportunity to re-envision its sources of power for cars and building alike. The also have the economic and technical ability to lead the world.
Peace
Couple that with mass transit (electric), current personal transit availability, and other issues, EV's are on the chopping block being at the end of the line. When conditions change to pre-meltdown status regarding electric energy availability, EV's will get their chance.
Peace
A car is a car no matter what the power plant. However, it does not matter what I see or you... what matters is their situation regarding nuclear plants and how to address it. Again, when conditions change to pre-meltdown status, then EV's will get another chance/look.
Peace
fossil fuels, and is paying a lot more for that energy, enough to threaten the country's economy. The Japanese before the accident were irresponsibly overconfident about nuclear power - now they are just as stupidly fearful of same. But the first stress tests have begun on several plants, which will resume production in the following months. The rest of the world is moving ahead with nuclear power - only the Japanese seem to have misread the lessons of Fukeshima : make sure you have fail safe backup power. It would only have cost a few thousand to have done so. It's a pipe dream to think the world can viably reduce carbon emissions without nuclear power.
http://www.proterra.com/index.php
they are already on the road in california
http://www.jaylenosgarage.com/video/Proterra-Ecoliner-Electric-Bus/1361158
Also, the "dubious longer-term issues" associated with "spent" nuclear fuel are issues that we impose on ourselves. Most of the long-lived radioactive isotopes in the "spent" fuel could be used to fuel other reactor. There is also generally a large amount of un-fissioned uranium contained in the "spent" fuel from comercial reactors that could easily be recovered. This waste occurs because our government has decided that reprocessing (recycling) this "spent" fuel is not a good idea.
And yes, it's unfortunate that more isn't done after the fuel is "spent". Like many other things, governments carry out a cost/benefit analysis and in the case of nuclear fuel have decided that reprocessing isn't cost-justifiable.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!