
2012 Honda Civic Hybrid, road test, Spring 2011
To Celebrate 100 Years, Chevy Sells Its One...
Nissan Boosts Fuel Economy By Redesigning CVT...
2013 Dodge Dart: 40-MPG CAFE Target Hints At...
2012 Chevrolet Sonic LT 1.8-Liter Hatchback...
2013 Ram 1500 Pickup Truck: Same Looks, Much...
2012 Honda Civic Hybrid - 44 MPG
Honda also has a proven track record with hybrids, having been there from the start with the 1999 Insight. The Civic Hybrid is its most efficient model at the moment, beating the cheaper Insight - at least until the 2012 Insight arrives.
2012 Toyota Prius V - 42 MPG
Toyota's 7-seat Prius sneaks straight into the top 10 according to the EPA's figures, meaning larger families can finally enjoy the great gas mileage Prius drivers have enjoyed for years. 44 MPG city should make those short trips a breeze.
2012 Lexus CT 200h - 42 MPG
The Lexus CT 200h might be a Prius in fancy clothes but that still gives it Prius-like efficiency. The trade off for slightly lower figures than the regular Prius is the luxurious interior and strong Lexus image.
2011 Honda Insight - 41 MPG
The Insight made it onto our Cheap Fuel Efficiency list last month for costing only $18,200 and managing 43 MPG highway. Think of it as a cheaper Prius and you won't be too wide of the mark.
2012 Ford Fusion Hybrid/Lincoln MkZ - 39 MPG
The Fusion and MkZ just scrape into the list to add to the tally of domestic fuel-sippers. Both are much cheaper than the Chevrolet Volt and if you do a lot of longer journeys, you won't miss the Volt's all-electric range either. Ford's hybrid technology has been well proven in New York and San Francisco taxi fleets.
+++++++++++
Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.
Have an opinion?
One more data point according to the EPA.
Mitsubishi i $540/year fuel (@$0.12/KWH)
Toyota Prius $1029/year fuel (@3.43/gallon).
The Prius cost 2X to fuel compared to the "i". Of course, the Prius is larger, less expensive to buy (I think, depending on rebates), and has a much larger range. Hmmm but it might also be more polluting, noiser, and less fun to drive.
Perhaps, for better or worst, people have become familiar with MPG and the EPA felt a desperate need to make MPGe.
The Europeans went another direction, grams CO2/km. Of course that has its own problems because it is hard to know how much CO2 is produced from each KWH of electricity in a complex electricity grid.
I suspect you're right. People like the familiar, and EVs are strange enough for most already without having an entirely different method of calculating economy.
As a European, I don't like g/km of CO2, mainly because I'm taxed on it. And since CO2 is directly linked to the fuel you burned, it means I'm being taxed on fuel TWICE. And the CO2 tax is indiscriminate of how much fuel I actually use, unlike regular fuel duty.
How does the CO2 tax work? Is it a yearly tax regardless of how much you drive?
Full details here: http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Motoring/OwningAVehicle/HowToTaxYourVehicle/DG_10012524
So you could potentially pay zero in tax if you had a Prius and drove 20k miles a year, and pay £460 a year tax if you drove a Range Rover 20 miles a year.
I don't mind paying duty on fuel as it's directly proportional to how much fuel you use. CO2-based tax is indiscriminate and arbitrary.
However, we also have something called "excise" tax that we might pay EVERY year based on the value of the car. For an older car, it might be only $100/year, but for a newer car it might be $1000/year.
So yes, the Leaf is a better car than the Prius, but not because it uses a gallon gasoline's worth of energy more efficient, but because it doesn't use that gallon of gasoline at all.
For me, it is fact that electrons can be made in many ways like wind, solar, and wave. Gasoline pretty much has to be dug up out of the ground and that ground may be in some other country. When the gasoline is consumed, it creates more problems.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!