Advertisement

2012 Chevrolet Sonic: First Drive

Follow Bengt

General Motors is no longer giving its fuel-efficient small cars short shrift. After much of a day behind the wheel of the new 2012 Chevrolet Sonic earlier this week, in the San Francisco Bay area, we found the 2012 Chevrolet Sonic to be fuel-efficient, comfortable, and in 1.4T form, the most refined model in this class, and one of the most engaging to drive.

With an all-new global platform, the new 2012 Chevrolet Sonic is a completely different car than the Aveo it replaces. While the Aveo was one of our lowest-rated cars, with sluggish performance, subpar safety, and disappointing gas mileage, the new Sonic's platform is stiff and rigid, with nearly 60 percent high-strength steel; and its powertrains—a naturally aspirated 1.8-liter and a turbocharged 1.4-liter—are poached directly from the Cruze compact sedan.

Perkier than Cruze, but no Eco

Since the Sonic weighs a few hundred pounds less than the Cruze, that translates to a perkier driving feel. Both engines make 138 horsepower, but the available 1.4T produces more torque, much lower in the rev range. The Michigan-made 1.4T also feels smoother and quieter; the 1.8-liter model moves nearly as quickly, but it becomes boomy when pushed.

Fuel economy is another reason to opt for the 1.4T—a $700 option on most of the lineup. While lower-level Sonic models with the 1.8 will return 25 mpg city, 35 highway with the new six-speed automatic or 26/35 with the five-speed manual (perhaps the only carry-over from the Aveo), the Sonic gets a much better 28/40 with its new six-speed manual. And it's expected to also hit 40 mpg on the highway with the 1.4T and six-speed automatic, a combination that will be out late this calendar year.

What's not part of the lineup at this point is a Chevrolet Sonic Eco. And, according to Chevrolet officials, it likely won't ever arrive.

Why? At higher speeds, shape matters more than weight, to some extent, and shorter cars the Sonic's length (particularly the shorter hatchback) have less favorable aerodynamics than longer ones at highway speeds. So even though the Cruze is several hundred pounds heavier, it was easier to get that 42-mpg highway rating out of the Chevrolet Cruze Eco than it would be to meet that figure in a Sonic Eco.

Promising mpg—especially from 1.4T

What we saw in our first extensive drive, in the San Francisco Bay area this past week, was promising. In driving that wasn't very eco-minded—stop-and-go through S.F., then out Highway 1 and into the mountains above Half Moon Bay and near Santa Cruz, we saw about 28 mpg in an automatic 1.8-liter car. Then on a similarly twisty route, down then back up along Skyline Drive, and along Bay Area freeways, we averaged 33 mpg in a 1.4T Sonic.


Advertisement
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (7)
  1. GM = Made in China by Mrs. Yoo's third-grade class.
     
    Post Reply
    -3
    Bad stuff?

  2. Nice Article Bengt one thing you forgot to mention that GM will be manufacturing the sonic in the USA and that GM will be the only one to manufacture a Sub Compact in the USA
    Robin
     
    Post Reply
    -2
    Bad stuff?

     
  3. "The Michigan-made 1.4T also feels smoother and quieter"
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. @James. Again, loose with the tructh, to be polite. Although most of the vehicloe development took place in S. Korea due to the old Daewoo's role in small car development for GM, the Sonic is 100% made in Wayne, MI. The only subcompact sold in N. America that's made in the U.S., actually.
    It doesn't really matter to me, actually, but attacking GM for being Chinese made when only GM makes a subcompact in the U.S.? That's out there even by your crazy standards.
     
    Post Reply
    -1
    Bad stuff?

  5. I don't think a 33 MPG really warrants a story in a website with "green" in the title. Now if it was a pick-up or something, perhaps, but not a 2-door passenger car with truly average mileage.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

     
  6. A man after my own heart. Well said.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  7. You got my hopes up for the Hyundai Veloster that you gave such high praise for only to see Car and Driver shoot it down. C&D is a straight shooter and usually coincides exactly with my experience on cars I've owned, so I'm going to have to take this review with a grain of salt until I see what they say.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion? Join the conversation!

Advertisement

Find Green Cars

Go!
Advertisement

Advertisement

 
© 2014 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC.