
2010 Toyota Prius
With fuel prices continuing to edge higher, the cost benefit of fuel saving hybrid and diesel vehicles are now more important than ever. We recently looked at why mainstream automakers in the U.S. refuse to launch more fuel efficient diesel models locally, and now we have details of a new study that’s looked into the often mystifying break-even costs of hybrid vehicles.
For the uninitiated, the break-even cost for a hybrid vehicle is essentially the amount of time it would take to cover the cost premium of the hybrid vehicle over a comparable gas-only model, assuming a given price for gas and the number of miles driven each year. What makes the task so complicated is that the price of gas can fluctuate quite dramatically, as we’ve seen over the past couple of years.
The guys over at CarGurus have now looked at 43 hybrids from model years 2003 to 2010 and calculated their average cost premiums to be around $6,400 over a comparable gasoline model--or about 17 percent. The study found that for some hybrid models, gas prices would need to be around $7 per gallon before it would be cost effective to purchase over their gas-only equivalents.

Mercedes S400 Hybrid
The results are hardly shocking as we’ve known for a long time that hybrid vehicles are often not the solution for motorists looking to save money. In fact, there are several studies with contradictory results including one that found only one hybrid vehicle currently on sale that’s worth buying if you’re looking to save money on gas bills--the Mercedes-Benz S400 Hybrid.
If such is the case, then why do so many people buy hybrids? It’s true that the large majority of people buying hybrids are looking to save money but sadly, it’s often the case that they would be better off buying a regular model or even a diesel. However, there are also a lot of buyers that flock to hybrid vehicles not to save money but rather for the image of being ‘green’.
[CarGurus via Detroit Free Press]
+++++++++++
Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!
And how tone deaf is the author. The only listed possible reasons for getting a hybrid is "saving money" or "having a green image." It should be clear to the author that cars like the Prius are actually cleaner. Not just an image of green but actually green. There are real world problems associated with gasoline consumption that are mitigated by using less. It would be worth a mention in such an article.
Furthermore, the price of the Prius is well in line with the cost of other vehicles and definitely less expensive than the Mercedes.
I think you fail to understand why this article and the previous one mentions the Mercedes S400. It's not because this is a car hybrid buyers should buy to saving money, it's to point out that the market is such that the only hybrid out there that will save you money in the long run is a huge Merc costing a ton of cash in the first place.
The pricing of the Merc provides nothing. It has nothing to do with cost or technology or where it is effective. The pricing of the Merc is arbitrary because there is enough gross margin in these vehicles to cover the cost of the hybrid system in the markup alone.
The Merc is still a gas guzzler.
Green Car Reports apparently stopped reading the article after the first paragraph where it says the Merc was the only one to pay back. This represent horrible irresponsible journalism as latter paragraphs clearly focus on the Prius and other low GHG emitting vehicles.
The BCAA is trying to get people to lower GHG emissions, what is the Green Car Reports trying to accomplish with this article?
The didn't say that customers are looking for "payback". They didn't say that customers are looking to have a green image. They said that customers are looking to reduce GHG emissions.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!