Advertisement

Why Buy Green Cars? For the Cost Savings, Not the Planet, Survey Says

Follow John

Slide from "Selling Green in Today's Market," GfK Research, October 2010

Slide from "Selling Green in Today's Market," GfK Research, October 2010

Enlarge Photo

If you're reading this site, there's a good chance that you're interested in driving green: saving fuel, perhaps reducing the overall impact of your transportation choices on the planet.

Or maybe not. Maybe, like the vast majority of U.S. buyers, you're interested in better fuel economy not for green reasons, but because it saves you money.

That's the motivation for most consumers when they look at fuel-efficient vehicles, according to a new survey from GfK Research entitled "Selling Green in Today's Market."

Lots of options, most confusing

Don DeVeaux, a managing partner at the market research firm, discussed the results of an online survey of consumers intending to buy cars, and their varying motivations for selecting particular types--in particular, cars with alternative powertrains.

One problem was the proliferation of different technologies: flex-fuel, clean diesel, hybrid, electric, plug-in hybrid, fuel cell, compressed natural gas (CNG), and others as well.

Hybrids were the most familiar, benefiting from a decade on sale and a clearly defined set of attributes (mostly good gas mileage).

But other alternative-fuel vehicles suffered not only from an awareness deficit, but also negative imagery associated with specific fuel types. Diesel, for example, was viewed as dirty, expensive, and inconvenient.

The picture can only get more complicated as smaller, more efficient engines make all cars more fuel efficient. Already, about half the cars with gas mileage over 30 mpg are not hybrids, but standard gasoline cars.

Slide from

Slide from

Enlarge Photo

Two-thirds say gas mileage is key

The key question in the survey may have been, "If the technology you selected required additional extra cost, how would you justify the investment?"

Fully two-thirds of respondents (67%) chose "better gas mileage"--far ahead of any of the other options. Those included "technology is better for the environment" (21%).

All other options scored in low single digits, including "showing that I care about the environment," along with "want the newest technology" and "technology will save me time."

MPG = money saved

Further questions reinforced the message: The main reason for buying a car with higher miles-per-gallon had nothing to do with greenhouse gases, natural resources, or dependence on foreign oil.

It was, simply, "Driving a vehicle with great gas mileage saves me money."

Consumers admitted that in tough economic times, the environment took a back seat to their wallets. And while the environment is an intangible and hard to assess, dollars and cents are about as tangible a measure as you can get.

Out of those intending to buy a new car, only one in four fall into groups that GfK defined as "deeply green." The others fell into categories ranging from those who intend to be green but do nothing about it to those who are actively hostile to green causes.

Slide from

Slide from

Enlarge Photo

Doom for electric cars?

When ranking vehicle attributes, convenience and cost are several of the top reasons for choosing or rejecting a new technology. In other words, if it doesn't save money and require little or no change to car buyers' routines, most won't consider it.

Is that a harbinger of doom for electric cars, which require plugging in to recharge? Not necessarily. Ranked on five different qualities, gasoline is seen as convenient but pricey, while electricity is viewed as clean and safe, but inconvenient.

Younger buyers, however, were more negative about gasoline, viewing it as less safe, less clean, and less convenient than older buyers--as well as a scarcer resource. In contrast, electricity is viewed about the same by all cohorts.

Over time, as the first electric cars begin to filter into neighborhoods, their owners may find that plugging in becomes second nature--and that word will spread to their neighbors. And their neighbors' teenage kids.

Advertisement
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (2)
  1. I am not sure how much stock to put in these surveys. They may be totally meaningless.
    My former boss told me that the reason he bought a Lexus is because he has to drive customers around. This is complete BS. He doesn't take customers in his Lexus. Real reason, "I am incredible vain" but I guess this does not show up on the survey.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. If you can plug in your cell phone you can plug in your car. Whats even better is you can drive off in the morning with a full charge. Get a solar panal and you can let the sun do it for you and even sell some of it back to the electric grid. The biggest negative about electric cars is range first and precieved quaility as a form of transportation and styling too. Tesla has the right idea because not only do they have the ability to go 200 miles on a single charge they are powerful and sexy too. The only downside is that they are not cheap, however they are spot on for a luxury sport sedan with the Model S so as battery prices go down as economy of scale develops to manufacture batteries at a lower cost they will become even more popular.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion? Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Advertisement

Get FREE Dealer Quotes

From dealers near you
Go!

Find Green Cars

Go!

Advertisement

 
© 2014 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by izmo, Inc.