Meeting Proposed CAFE Standards of 45 MPG By 2020 Would Require Widespread Adoption of Hybrids and EVs, Higher Incentives Necessary

 

Gas gauge

Gas gauge

Enlarge Photo

CAFE regulations will climb rapidly by 2016.  The new standards will reach 35.5 mpg overall with cars at 42 and light trucks at 26.  The push to raise fuel economy is long overdue and automakers are fully aware that compliance is mandatory.  The new standards set by the government are supported by consumers as research shows fuel economy is "tops" on the list for new car buyers.

Now the Consumer Federation of America has stepped in urging president Obama to raise the CAFE numbers again by 2020.  The CFA believes that the standards should be set at 45 mpg by 2020, a number that may seem unobtainable today, but they believe the technology needed to reach these lofty goals are already available and simply need to be put to use.

The Obama administration will iron out the final details over CAFE standards next April, but the CFA is adamant that their proposition should be followed.  As Mark Cooper, director of the CFA said, "There is no question that the EPA should take the lead in developing the next generation of standards for the sake of the consumer and the industry. NHTSA not only has statutory limits that prevent long-term planning, but they have a history of close alignment with the domestic car companies, whose current financial woes stem from a lack of fuel efficient vehicles. If they were not in such bad shape, NHTSA could have set the 2016 standard at more than 38 mpg"

Certainly 45 mpg as a CAFE number is achievable by 2020, but reaching that figure depends on the public acceptance and willingness to buy electric and hybrid vehicles.  EVs in particular, could quickly increase a companies average fuel economy, but only if people buy them in mass numbers.  Likewise with hybrids, they will increase CAFE numbers, but to what degree?

CAFE requirements are difficult to meet due to fluctuating gas prices which influence purchases.  As we saw a year ago with gas prices over $4 a gallon, consumers turned to compact, efficient cars.  Now as gas prices are significantly lower, buyers have trended towards trucks and SUVs.

An automaker can produce all the electric and hybrid vehicles it desires in an attempt to reach CAFE requirements, but buyers are necessary.  A rethinking of the guidelines may be in order to promote the purchase of fuel efficient vehicles.  Stronger incentives to buyers of electric vehicles could increase CAFE numbers significantly.  Its not a matter of "If you build it they will come" rather more like "If you build it will they come."

Source: Automotive News (Login required)





Posted in:
 
Follow Us

People Who Read This Article Also Read

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (3)
  1. There's wrong, totally wrong and not even wrong. These statements are not even wrong. The sources you quote act as if consumers are just being finicky about performance, comfort or convenience, and completely ignore the costs of these new vehicles, which tend to be 50% more than vehicles with similar performance and utility (see Civic vs. Prius). Given the credit crunch and years of stagnant wages, no one has the down payment for such vehicles. These are exactly the regulations that kill industries - people will stop buying new cars simply keep their jalopy running longer, and polluting more.
    If such regs do pass, then the big 3 should buy 2 and 3 wheel vehicle manufacturers, and spread their corporate averages over trucks, cars and motorcycles / scooters.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. Actually, I was thinking about this the other day... a lot of those "old jalopy" cars get better gas mileage than modern vehicles. In fact, I believe that the Ford Festiva (or fiesta, can't get it straight) gets over 60mpg just by being tiny and efficient. Not to mention lots of reports of old VW rabbits getting 40+ mpg. It's just dirty car companies selling us cars that guzzle gas because it has always been so cheap to us Americans. In the long run, these regulations are necessary, and won't cost the industry nearly as much as you think. You'll be surprised how "innovative" private sector can be to stay afloat. Plus, it will ultimately lead to more pure EV's.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. 2 CEOs in a row are forced to resign at GM because they continue to lose money and all they have to do is raise fuel economy to be more competitive, and you think they don't because they like to see the economy fall apart when oil prices spike? I had a friend with a Ford Festiva about 10 years ago. I think they produce about 50 horsepower. TERRIBLE acceleration even for how light they are (1,598 lbs). It basically had a motorcycle engine put into an oversize pop can with wheels. Absolutely would fail every safety standard of today. If they tried to duplicate it, by the time it was brought up to code, it would need a much bigger engine to even move. Same with all of those small 1980's-early 1990's cars like the Cavalier, Tercel etc. I mean, look at the 2010 smart cars, 36 combined mpg according to fueleconomy.gov! Worse than the Ford Fusion Hybrid.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Find Green Cars

Go!


 
© 2011 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC.