Advertisement

Electric Supercar Concept Uses Small Turbine Engine To Boost Range

Follow John

Capstone Turbine CMT-380 concept car

Capstone Turbine CMT-380 concept car

Enlarge Photo

We're gearing up for the Los Angeles Auto Show here at GreenCarReports, and the press releases are flying across the desk. Most of them don't apply to green car buyers and fans, but here's one worth watching.

At the show, Capstone Turbine Corp. will unveil its CMT-380 concept, an extended-range electric supercar. Here's the kicker: The CMT-380 extends the 80-mile range of its lithium-ion battery pack by up to 500 miles with an onboard generator turned by...a turbine engine.

The powertrain uses the same extended-range electric car concept as the 2011 Chevrolet Volt. Technically, neither car is a hybrid, since the range extender (a 1.4-liter gasoline engine in the Volt, the turbine in the CMT-380) never powers the wheels mechanically.

Many companies are developing dedicated engine designs for range extenders, including Lotus.  But you can turn a generator with any power source that produces torque, and that's hardly limited to gasoline combustion engines. Now, an efficient microturbine steps up.

Tesla performance, 500 miles

Capstone claims a 0-to-60-mph time of just 3.9 seconds (the same as the Tesla Roadster), along with a top speed of 150 mph. Physics being what it is, those two are not likely to be achieved together if the electric range is to remain at 80 miles.

The 30-kilowatt (40-horsepower) C30 microturbine runs on diesel fuel (or biodiesel). The generator it powers is mounted on the same shaft, supported by air bearings, meaning no lubrication is required. There's also no radiator needed for cooling.

Capstone claims the turbine runs so clean that its exhaust needs no aftertreatment to meet U.S. Environmental Protection Agency regulations, or the even tougher limits of the California Air Resources Board.

High speeds, many fuels

The Capstone turbine  uses a so-called recuperator (or air-to-air heat exchanger), that extracts heat energy from the exhaust stream and recycles it to preheat the air entering the combustion chamber, increasing efficiency.

Turbines can run on a huge variety of fuels, including diesel, biodiesel, kerosene, propane, natural gas, and even waste methane from landfills.

But the main advantage to a turbine is that it runs cleanly and efficiently at steady ouput, at extremely high speeds (up to 96,000 rpm for the C30). Just think of jetliners, which accelerate from idle to high power, take off, throttle back, then run their engines at steady speeds for hours.

1963 Chrysler Turbine concept car, photographed by Wikipedia user Karmann

1963 Chrysler Turbine concept car, photographed by Wikipedia user Karmann

Enlarge Photo

Achilles Heel: power cycling

But the standard driving "duty cycle" of a combustion engine, on the other hand, requires a much wider power range.  Accelerating a 2- or 3-ton vehicle away from a stoplight in less than 10 seconds can take up to 20 times the power needed to keep it cruising at 60 mph on a level highway. Gasoline engines have evolved over a century to handle these competing needs most efficiently.

As Chrysler learned in the Sixties, when it released 56 prototypes of its elegant Chrysler Turbine coupe for real-world tests by roughly 200 drivers,  turbines are not necessarily suited to rapid acceleration cycles of varied driving.

Chrysler's test cars suffered from throttle lag, very high exhaust temperatures, and mediocre fuel economy (17 mpg) from their 97-kilowatt (130-horsepower) turbine engines, which powered the car through a standard automatic transmission.

Using a turbine as a steady-speed source to generate electric power, on the other hand, lets it operate most efficiently and at close to its maximum output.


Advertisement
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (3)
  1. Technically I believe the vehicle is a serial hybrid and if the generator is powerful enough to power the drive motor by itself then it would be a strong serial hybrid. The engine does not have to be able to drive the wheels directly to be a hyrbrid, just a parallel hybrid.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. This actually makes sense.
    I dislike small gas turbines since their specific fuel consumption (SFC = Pounds of fuel per HP per Hr.) is poor. But, if you don't use them often, that's less of a concern.
    Of more concern is a "range extenders" dead weight. Hauling an inert, heavy IC engine around with battery power, a la Volt, is problematic.
    For a 500 mile trip the "mission weight" (MW)of turbine + fuel is probably not that different from an IC engine MW but for city driving the car would be driven with nearly empty tanks which would only be filled for long trips.
    The "light turbine + large ,heavy fuel tank" vs. "Heavy IC engine + light fuel tank" comes down in favor of the turbine for city driving - which for most people is most of their driving.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. Perhaps a battery electric auto with a trailer hitch and electrical connection for hauling a streamlined trailer with an engine generator and perhaps additional electrical storage. Rent them at U-Haul for extended trips, turn them in at the destination, rent another for the return trip. Units could be sized for medium and longer trips.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion? Join the conversation!

Advertisement

Find Green Cars

Go!
Advertisement

Advertisement

 
© 2014 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by izmo, Inc.