
General Motors' mysterious 230 logo
2011 Chevrolet Volt Ultimate Guide
90% of Chevy Volt Plug-In Hybrid Customers New...
What You Need To Know About Nissan Leaf, Chevy...
Volt-Based 'Amp' Due In Detroit: Wise Move By...
Chevrolet Volt and Opel Ampera: What Are The...
UPDATE: GM confirms that the 2011 Chevrolet Volt will get 230 mpg city, and a composite fuel economy (city and highway) of more than 100 mpg according to draft regulations being developed at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
If the rumors are correct, this morning General Motors CEO Fritz Henderson will finally reveal what the company's mysterious '230' ad campaign was about. It appears to be the official mileage rating for GM's upcoming 2011 Chevrolet Volt extended-range electric car.
A number like that seems outlandish, absurd. How can the US Environmental Protection Agency possibly measure fuel consumption that low? The answer, it turns out, is all in the assumptions.
40 miles, no gasoline
The Volt, remember, stores energy in both a gasoline tank and a battery pack. And it will always prioritize using electricity from the battery to power itself before it ever switches on the gas engine. Unlike a conventional hybrid car, though, the battery pack is usually recharged by plugging the Volt into a wall socket.
But the Volt's 16-kilowatt-hour battery pack only gives it 40 miles of electric range. To eliminate "range anxiety," after that, the Volt switches on its engine to run a generator that provides power to its electric motor. That gives another 300-plus miles of range.
So depending on how many of the Volt's miles are run on grid power, and how many by burning gasoline in the engine to generate its own electricity.
GM often cites the statistic that more than 70 percent of all US vehicles travel less than 40 miles a day. If your usage falls within that level, your Volt would never turn on its engine--and never use a drop of gasoline. That's gas mileage of, well, infinity.
On the other hand, if you drive a Volt 140 miles every single day, still recharging it at night, it would travel 40 miles on grid power and 100 miles on gasoline. If the car gets 50 miles per gallon with the engine on, that's two gallons burned, 140 miles total, or 70 mpg.
The more daily miles over that first 40, the higher the proportion of gasoline burned--and the lower the overall mileage.
What to assume about usage?
Which leads to the big question: What assumptions should the EPA make in its emissions and gas-mileage tests about how the Volt is used (also known as the car's "duty cycle")?
For decades, gasoline cars (and hybrids) have been testing using two cycles: city and highway. That gives us the two quoted EPA mileage ratings, and the EPA also calculates a "blended" number for overall usage. The distance driven doesn't really matter.
But for the Volt, mileage assumptions become much more political. If the EPA tests a Volt over a cycle of less than 40 miles, it will never burn any gasoline, and it'll get that "infinite" mileage. The daily distance matters much more for the Volt than for a gas engined car.
The answer appears to be the EPA has adopted a cycle described by GM-Volt.com, among others, that assumes the Volt is driven until the battery is discharged--and then slightly more on gasoline power.
Your mileage may vary
A similar test routine proposed by Mike Duoba at Argonne National Laboratories repeatedly drives the car on four EPA highway test cycles until the battery is discharged, then drives one city cycle--totaling 51 miles. (The EPA city cycle is roughly 11 miles, the highway cycle about 10 miles.)
If the engine runs for 11 miles at 50 mpg, that will use 0.22 gallons of gasoline. But that amount is used over a total travel distance of 51 miles, which works out to 232 mpg. Sounds like 230 mpg to us!
In the end, we can only return to that old saying: Your mileage may vary. And in the case of the 2011 Chevrolet Volt, it may vary a whole lot more than in any car running purely on gasoline. But, hey, no one ever said being green meant easy math ....
[GM-Volt via TheCollegeDriver]
Have an opinion?
Gre Posted: 8/11/2009 5:49am PDT
David Posted: 8/11/2009 7:49am PDT
And I have heard anecdotally (GM won't say) that the tank size is roughly 8 gallons, but they may still be tweaking that.
(This is, needless to say, much cheaper than a mile driven on gasoline at 15 to 20 cents/gallon depending on the car's mileage and the price of gas.)
Vikas Posted: 8/11/2009 8:49am PDT
(contd..)
vikas Posted: 8/11/2009 8:50am PDT
So is it really fair to compare EPA mileage rating using GM's estimate vs. other hybrids on road?
EPA's mpg ratings are to protect the environment, not to make the car driving cheaper for Americans to start driving even more!
Or is that just another lame attempt by GM to try and fool the world?
More than that, for the US grid there's a very good joint study by the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) and the National Resources Defense Council (NRDC). See here:
http://www.greencarreports.com/blog/1019159_how-green-is-that-plug-in-depends-where-you-plug-it-in
Michael Posted: 8/11/2009 10:26am PDT
Tom L Posted: 8/11/2009 1:33pm PDT
Rich E Posted: 8/11/2009 2:12pm PDT
How stupid does GM think people are?
People are going to be pissed when they realize that they can't drive 2300 miles on 10 gallons of gas.
Not only that, but where does electricity come from? The overflow (the kind that would be used to recharge cars if/when electric cars become common) comes from burning NATURAL GAS.
John Posted: 8/12/2009 1:23am PDT
RW Posted: 8/12/2009 9:19am PDT
Full charge: 17.78 kWh (16kWh/.9)
National average electricity cost: $0.115/kWh.
Full charge cost: $2.04 (17.78 kWh X $0.115/kWh) to go 40 miles
Gas cost: $2.50
Equivalent MPG: 48.9 miles/gallon ($2.50/$2.04 * 40mpg)
The numbers are better for me (my avg cost/kWh: $0.085), and get even better when the price of gas goes up.
My conclusion: The Volt averages (cost-wise) about 50mpg.
So, your Volt number should be roughly half the cost.
Also curious about the $2.50 gasoline cost to go 40 miles. Average US car is roughly 25 mpg, and at a gas cost of $2.50 (for neatness' sake), that works for to 1.6 gallons or $4.00 ...
Dennis Posted: 8/12/2009 10:36am PDT
JHA Posted: 8/12/2009 10:45am PDT
JV. Why would GM underate the range by 40 miles? It still makes the claim of $0.01 to $0.03 per mile seem overly optimistic. Especially if you factor in lower charging discharging efficiencies.
JHA Posted: 8/12/2009 10:53am PDT
JV, are you saying when the vehicle has new batteries the range will be 80 highway miles?
Jon Posted: 8/12/2009 1:28pm PDT
Jim Posted: 8/12/2009 1:46pm PDT
Jerry Posted: 8/12/2009 2:14pm PDT
This seems obvious which means, of course, that GM will argue with the EPA for as long as their lawyers and publicity flacks can drag it out.
And, in the end we'll end up with something that is as close to meaningless as possible.
Eric Posted: 8/12/2009 4:45pm PDT
Bob Wallace Posted: 8/13/2009 9:22am PDT
Many municipalites are installing charge points for EVs as are some businesses/hotels.
One hotel began installing them when the Tesla was announced (way before it hit the street).
One of our local towns installed a free charge point for EVs some time ago for those driving "homebrews". They decided the few bucks each month gave them a good return for helping to get us off gas.
Expect to see "pay as you go" charge points along your vacation route in the near(ish) future.
Paul Krantz Posted: 8/13/2009 1:47pm PDT
Scarborian Posted: 8/13/2009 2:29pm PDT
Now, stick a few of those in a car and get rid of the gas engine and you've got yourself something I might buy. As for recharging times, if they made the battery a quick-change module that I could just swap out at any gas station then they'd really have something to talk about.
Dennis Posted: 8/14/2009 8:29am PDT
The EPA City Cycle turns off A/C, heat, stereo, head/tail lamps, rr defrost, in-dash LCD screens, wipers, infotainment systems, heated and air conditioned seats, etc. Hmmm…. how much power do they sap - or are people going to do without, for $40k+? Also, the City Cycle limits speed (56mph) and acceleration. On an electric vehicle, these factors will have a much more direct effect on the range.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!