
2014 Volkswagen XL1, 2013 Geneva Motor Show
2015 Audi A3 TDI Diesel Sedan Unveiled At NY...
Mitsubishi GR-HEV Concept: Hybrid Pickup At...
Volkswagen CrossBlue Coupe Concept: Plug-In...
Qoros 3 Cross Hybrid Concept: Geneva Motor Show...
Mitsubishi CA-MiEV Concept: Compact Electric...
Will this be the car that finally makes the ultra-aerodynamic and futuristic GM EV1 electric car look old-fashioned?
Today, VW Group took the wraps off the production version of the Volkswagen XL1, a turbodiesel plug-in hybrid two-seater that will be its most fuel-efficient model ever offered.
The ultra-streamlined XL1 was first shown as a concept car in January 2011.
Efficiency starts with an extremely lightweight 12-foot-long body made of carbon-fiber-reinforced plastic, with an astoundingly low drag coefficient of just 0.186 and total weight of only 1,750 pounds.
That's partially due to its staggered, seating, which reduces the car's overall width--and thereby its frontal area--to reduce the amount of air it displaces moving down the road at speed, all in the name of saving fuel.
You'll also notice the rear wheels are inset, and there are no door mirrors--with the XL1 using rear-view video cameras instead.
The Volkswagen XL1 production car is powered by a tiny 0.8-liter two-cylinder turbocharged diesel engine producing 47 horsepower and a 20-kilowatt (27-hp) electric motor paired with a 7-speed automated dual-clutch transmission.
Fuel efficiency is quoted as 261 miles per gallon on the European test cycle, though as always that doesn't translate directly to what the U.S. EPA might put on a window sticker--if the XL1 were ever to go on sale in the U.S.
And achieving that fuel economy does require a few recharges of the car's lithium-ion battery pack, which is mounted up front, with the engine, motor, and transmission in the tail behind the passengers.
If you don't plug it in, it gets a mere 120 miles per gallon--again on the European test cycle. But steady-state cruising at 62 mph requires just 6.2 horsepower, so once you get it up to highway speeds, the XL1 is insanely fuel-efficient.
The car's fuel tank holds merely 10 liters, or about 2.6 gallons, of diesel fuel.
Sadly, the XL1 is unlikely to make it to the U.S. Among other things, it's likely to be quite expensive. With two powertrains and a pricey battery pack, Volkswagen has said it will be far, far more expensive than a mass-produced Volkswagen Golf.
Volkswagen will initially build about 50 copies of the XL1 to gauge demand, with more possible if sales take off.
The production version of the XL1 follows a decade of Volkswagen concept cars with the goal of producing a "1-liter car," or a vehicle that could travel 100 kilometers (62 miles) on 1 liter of gasoline (or about 1 quart).
For more pictures, launches and details from the Geneva floor, head over to our special Geneva Motor Show page.
+++++++++++
Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.
Have an opinion?
Transmission? Diesel?? 31 miles AER???
Not just old, obsolete too.
The XL1 is very impressive and VWs effort is truly commendable. However I just expected a lot more from one of the largest, most creative, and most influential car companies in the world. I expected practical and affordable plug-in electrics. I expected the Blue eMotions and the e-Trons at the local dealerships. I expected inspiration and leadership.
Let's hope the XL1 is just the start and that VAG has a lot more in store for the electric vehicle aficionados.
"The 2013 Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class is one of the most attractive luxury sedans you can purchase, but its high price tag should give potential buyers some pause."
A design so bad it almost immediately inspired similar designs like the A7, CC, & Jaguar XF. Yeah, that must be terrible...
Its so called 261mpg is including the electricity portion so it is NOT true 261 mpg. And its performance is terrible for the cost...
This is one of the few cases where a block of batteries probably makes more sense.
"...That's partially due to its staggered, seating, which reduces the car's overall width--and thereby its frontal area--"
In context with the previous paragraph, it sounds like he is implying that a smaller frontal area decreases Cd (drag coefficient). It does not. Smaller frontal area does reduce drag which depends on both Cd and A.
I am sure Voelcker already knows this, but the way it is worded, I am not sure the reader will get the right impression.
Even though this will just be an exercise for the well-heeled, still like it better then them getting a Ferrari.
Do you have a contact at VW that I can forward this question to them directly?
Dr. John McLuckie
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!