Both Toyota and Honda are hybrid pioneers.
Both companies sell subcompact gasoline models (the Toyota Yaris and the Honda Fit) and separate subcompact hybrid models (the Toyota Prius C and Honda Insight).
What most U.S. buyers don't know is that those companies also sell hybrid versions of the Yaris and Fit. They sell well in Japan--but the companies have no intention of bringing them to the States.
Why? According to a Toyota executive who asked to remain anonymous, it has to do with the differences between how drivers in the U.S. and the rest of the world travel, and small-car aerodynamics.
While this is one man's unconfirmed account, it explains a question that had always puzzled us. Here's what he said.
More high-speed highway
In short, European and Japanese buyers not only travel shorter distances in their cars, they do so at slower speeds. With older cities and relatively less U.S.-style suburban sprawl, those drivers spend more time in stop-and-go traffic--and a lot less time on the highway.
In the U.S., we think nothing of hopping in our cars to travel 100 miles or more. Elsewhere, gasoline is double the price, and mass transit is an accepted alternative--often even the default.
Trains and buses are clean, comfortable, frequent, and quick. They're used by all segments of society. And the price against the cost of gasoline and tolls is a much better match than in the States.
Aerodynamic drag counts
That means that highway fuel efficiency weighs less on the mind of many non-U.S. buyers than does city fuel economy. That's where aerodynamics comes in.
Both the Honda Insight and the Toyota Prius C have lower drag coefficients than the Fit Hybrid and Yaris Hybrid, respectively. That puts less strain on their smaller, less powerful gasoline engines at highway speeds--improving gas mileage.
According to our Toyota source, in real-world use, the Yaris Hybrid would have delivered unacceptably low highway mileage for U.S. buyers.
(The gas mileage of the all-new 2012 Yaris is only average, mind you.)
As it is, the 2012 Toyota Prius C hybrid subcompact gets 53 mpg city, but only 47 mpg highway.
Not only does it have a smaller engine, but it's less aerodynamic than the longer Toyota Prius liftback model--which is taller, heavier, more powerful, and more spacious, but gets the same combined 50-mpg rating.
It's particularly hard to make short cars aerodynamically efficient. The ideal aero shape is a teardrop, and if you chop too much off the tail of the tear, you increase drag.
Brand-new cars vs hybrid options
In other words, both Honda and Toyota incurred the extra expense of developing a brand-new dedicated hybrid vehicle (using elements of their existing subcompact platforms) largely to deliver the right balance of gas-mileage figures.
Has it worked?
In Honda's case, arguably not. The gasoline Honda Fit, now several years into its model run, is still one of the better subcompacts, with unparalleled interior versatility.
And despite a mild refresh for the 2012 Insight, sales of Honda's smallest hybrid model have been far below projections.
The 2012 Toyota Prius C, however, is off to a successful start globally, with strong sales in the U.S., in Japan, and around the world.
Here, it has both the strength of the Prius name and, with its battery under the rear seat, a full-size rear load bay--unlike the Insight, which has its battery under the load deck.
Which do you prefer?
In fact, the Prius family has become the third best-selling car line in the world this year.
So if you like the looks of the Yaris more than the Prius C ... too bad. If you want a subcompact hybrid from Toyota, it's the Prius C or nothing.
What do you think? Would you prefer a Yaris Hybrid to a Prius C, or a Honda Fit Hybrid over an Insight?
Leave us your thoughts in the Comments below.
+++++++++++
Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.
Have an opinion?
I wondered about this too. But it looks like Toyota calls the Prius C a subcompact.
http://pressroom.toyota.com/releases/toyota+prius+c+completes+prius+family+vehicles.htm
Thanks
John C. Briggs
I don't think we've ever called the Leaf a subcompact, but we'll plead guilty to calling it a compact.
However, there are severe drawbacks to using the NHTSA interior-volume dimensions to categorize cars, as you do. For instance:
http://www.greencarreports.com/news/1067775_more-fisker-bad-news-epa-calls-20-mpg-karma-a-subcompact
and
http://www.greencarreports.com/news/1052335_how-to-enjoy-your-compact-car-a-455-horse-6-75-liter-v-
News Flash to Honda:
The Insight is a sales failure. Phase is out and replace it with the Fit hybrid. There are thousands of US buyers waiting for it to happen!
I am suspicious that emphasis on highway MPG has more to do with marketing than reality. I hate it when I see a car advertised as "36mpg" when its real-world city MPG is more like 17.
When you're on the highway and traffic is stop-and-go, guess what -- it's the city MPG that's more relevant.
I would like to see efficiency optimized in a given car _class_. This is starting to happen with mid-size sedans, with the Camry, Fusion, and Sonata all offering excellent city MPG.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!