Hyundai Sonata Hybrid Delay: Deciding To Make...
2013 Lincoln MKZ Hybrid Sales Finally Tick Up...
Global Toyota Prius Hybrid Sales Level Off As...
Gas mileage: It's all about hybrids, right?
The 2012 Toyota Prius hatchback and Toyota Prius C models each get a combined 50-mpg rating from the EPA, the highest fuel efficiency of any non-plug-in vehicle sold in the U.S.
So hybrid sales should be soaring.
They're not.
While Toyota has expanded the Prius line from one to four vehicles for 2012, and more makers roll out hybrid models each year, the share of overall U.S. sales racked up by hybrid-electric vehicles has stayed between 2 and 3 percent for the past few years.
For 2011, hybrid sales represented 2.2 percent of a total 12.8 million vehicles sold. That compares to 2.4 percent of 11.5 million overall in 2010, according to figures from LMC Automotive cited by Bloomberg.
The explanation is simple: Hybrid-electric technology definitely improves fuel efficiency, letting a vehicle recapture and reuse energy that would otherwise be wasted as heat from the brakes.
But it's not the only way to increase gas mileage, and it's expensive.
Even at Toyota's high volumes--it has built at least half of the world's 3 million-plus hybrid vehicles since 1997--a full hybrid system like the Prius's adds $1,000 to $2,000 to the cost of a new car. For lower-volume makers, the increment is higher.
And to meet increasingly stringent fuel efficiency standards between now and 2025, manufacturers will focus most intently on reducing the consumption of their high-volume gasoline engines.
We've long said that the bulk of the gasoline saved globally will come from smaller, much more efficient gasoline engines.
Consider the 2011 Hyundai Elantra mid-size sedan, which dumped any V-6 option. The 2013 Ford Fusion follows suit, and we may soon even see a 1.0-liter, 3-cylinder EcoBoost engine offered in the subcompact Ford Fiesta.
So even as the number of hybrid models soars--most manufacturers will offer one or more--their competition is increasing.
And with U.S. gasoline prices relatively low by global standards, the difference in fuel cost between a more efficient gasoline car and a hybrid may actually be falling.
With more and more compact (and soon mid-size?) cars claiming 40 mpg for EPA highway mileage--and combined ratings of 30 mpg or more--hybrid cars will have to get even higher ratings to make a significant difference.
After all, in 2004, a Toyota Prius got 46 mpg combined, but a Corolla was rated at 28 mpg with an automatic.
Today, the 50-mpg Prius may get compared to a 33-mpg 2012 Hyundai Elantra. As both cars have migrated up the non-linear MPG scale, the number of gallons saved gets smaller.
Even at $4 gasoline, the annual fuel cost savings over 12,000 miles are less than $500 between the two cars.
Next year, the 2013 Ford Fusion (not the hybrid version) may be rated above 30 mpg combined when fitted with a 1.6-liter EcoBoost four--and it's a much larger vehicle.
Still, it's early days yet, and most industry analysts expect hybrid technology to spread slowly throughout the world's new cars.
It may grow from today's 1 percent of global production (or very roughly 1 million cars out of 80 million vehicles built worldwide) to 5 to 8 percent by the end of the decade.
Cheaper start-stop technology, however, may by then have become almost universal. It simply switches off engines when a car is stopped, and it doesn't require the costly high-voltage battery packs, electric motor(s), or power electronics that hybrid systems do.
So when someone sneers at hybrids because their sales are falling, calmly remind them that it's not about a specific technology.
It's about using less gasoline.
+++++++++++
Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.
Have an opinion?
Based on the numbers in the article
2010 276,000
2011 281,600
If not for supply problems in Japan, this would have been even better.
Also, from the linked article.
Sergio Marchionne, chief executive officer of Fiat SpA (F)
“if anyone thinks they will meet future EPA rules solely with internal combustion engines, they are smoking an illegal substance.”
So irrational is people's reaction to the word "hybrid" Buick has dropped the word from its marketing. So you will end up driving a hybrid and won't even know it. It will simply be a car, as it always has been.
I almost put in the Marchionne quote, which supports the future-looking part of the article at the end. And I agree that the word "hybrid" has become very polarizing. Of course, sadly, so has the word "Volt" ....
The treatment of hybrid in a negative light here is more than a title size limitation.
The fact that you want one but can't afford one speaks to the fundamental challenge. The combination of electric motor(s), high-voltage battery pack, and power electronics added to a (smaller) internal combustion engine isn't likely to fall to zero, ever.
People have a certain amount of money to spend and get the "best" car that they can get. Whether "best" means hybrid or leather seats is a value judgement of the buyer. I assure you that a hybrid system is a better value than leather seats.
It doesn't help matters that Journos use this false logic and convince people than hybrids are not worth it. Hybrids are total worth the price. Leather seats are not.
In my case, I would have either bought a 2006 Sienna or 2006 Prius. The price was the same. Absolutely ZERO premium for the hybrid system.
One more thing; some Americans pay a premium for muscle cars that are useless on the roads; some pay for a truck to commute to the office, and some of us don't mind paying a premium to save on emissions
18 months ago Voelcker was claiming an added cost of $6000. See
http://www.greencarreports.com/news/1045842_youll-save-money-with-higher-mpg-cars-but-itll-cost-you
With him changing his tune at this rate, with in less than a year he will be saying hybrid systems don't cost any more than standard ICE in less than one year. :) nice
The estimate of $1,000-$2,000 in this article is clearly identified as an estimate for Toyota, the world's most experienced and highest-volume hybrid maker. Their cost is likely lower than any other maker.
The $6,000 cost estimate in the article you cite is from a National Research Council study, done in 2009 and released in 2010, that used then-current data. I don't know what production volumes and experience the study assumes to get that $6,000, but I can assure you that for a Prius, Toyota pays FAR less than that!
Extraction of raw materials for the vehicle adds 4%, and only 2% of lifetime carbon is due to manufacturing & assembly. Hybrids may be slightly higher in raw materials & assembly, due to battery pack & electric machinery, but the difference in overall lifetime carbon in building hybrid vs. conventional cars is negligible.
Unless that Land-Rover nears 50 mpg, the Prius is better.
Jim in Phoenix
To make a real difference environmentally, we need cheaper ICE cars with small gas engines, diesels, and turbos (all including start/stop technology). That's the only way you're going to get widespread adoption of higher-mileage vehicles in the foreseeable future.
In the long run, it's going to be improved batteries and ubiquitous charging stations that make pure electrics the most effective means of helping the environment, not hybrids.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!