Advertisement

High Gas Prices May Soon Turn Your Lovely Suburb Into A Slum

 
Follow John

Kibera slums outside Nairobi, Kenya, by Flickr user Chrissy Olson

Kibera slums outside Nairobi, Kenya, by Flickr user Chrissy Olson

Enlarge Photo

Related Photo Galleries


See more photos »

Americans rarely think much about zoning, but it governs almost every facet of how we live our lives.

And unintended consequences of 50-year-old zoning codes may be about to turn some of our loveliest and quietest suburbs into the next slums.

Why? Simply because they've been built too far away from everything else, and we won't be able to afford the gasoline it takes to go to and fro.


Suburbs: slums of the future?

At least, that's the provocative conclusion of Peter Newman, one of the authors of a study released by the Planning Institute of Australia late last year.

The study looks at the future of suburban Australia, which has evolved in patterns very much like suburban America: sprawling, low-density, auto-dependent residential enclaves miles away from commercial areas and office parks.

"Urban sprawl is finished," Newman told The Age. "If we continue to roll out new land releases and suburbs that are car-dependent, they will become the slums of the future.''

Homes vs stores vs offices & factories

Following World War II, with the rise of affordable automobiles, cheap fuel, and an increasingly affluent society, the brand-new suburban house on its own half- or full-acre plot was the American dream.

The controversial D909 in the suburbs of Paris

The controversial D909 in the suburbs of Paris

Enlarge Photo

Zoning codes adopted in the U.S. isolated residences from any commercial and industrial activities, often in curving cul-de-sacs sans sidewalks. Many developments could be entered only from a single point off high-speed arterial roads.

No longer could you send the kid to the corner store on his bike to pick up a gallon of milk.

That corner store became a big-box chain store up to 10 miles away, and public transportation was ignored as a relic of decaying central cities.

Will cheap gasoline end?

That worked fine as long as gasoline remained cheap. With the greater difficulty of extracting and refining hydrocarbon-based fuels, not to mention unrest in oil-producing countries, we may be entering a future of permanently pricier gasoline.

For those trapped in "affordable" suburban homes 50 miles or more from their jobs, the theory goes, there will be few options other than more fuel-efficient vehicles. The value of the homes will decline and the neighborhoods will decay.

We're not entirely convinced by Newman's prediction. More stringent corporate average fuel-economy laws are improving the average gas mileage of all vehicles. U.S. gasoline consumption actually peaked in 2006, and will likely fall more in coming years.

Households can switch to more fuel-efficient cars, and some level of telecommuting holds promise as well. Still, the housing market ruthlessly adjusts the value of all residences in real time.

Just too far away

This was evident in a late-2008 visit to California's High Desert, the very furthest reach of exurban development. The area had seen huge waves of "affordable" town houses and starter homes for buyers priced out of Los Angeles.

Located 90 miles from central LA, the area was simply too far from most jobs. When gasoline prices spiked in 2008, half-built condos were abandoned, fully-built developments stayed empty, and developers walked away. 

Plug-ins offer hope

One ray of hope may be plug-in cars: The cost of driving a mile on grid electricity is one-fifth to one-half the cost of driving the same mile on $4-per-gallon gasoline in a 25-mpg vehicle. They're pricey today, but they'll get cheaper over time.

Toyota Prius Plug-In Hybrid prototype, tested in November 2010

Toyota Prius Plug-In Hybrid prototype, tested in November 2010

Enlarge Photo

Unfortunately, the elected representatives of suburban enclaves are historically many of the same ones who have consistently voted against Federal funding for development and rollout of plug-in vehicles--which could come to be viewed as sacrificing long-term salvation for short-term convenience.

While the complete Australian study is only available online to members of the Planning Institute, we might recommend such works as James Howard Kunstler's The Geography of Nowhere: The Rise and Decline of America's Man-Made Landscape.

Meanwhile, consider this question: How high would a gallon of gas have to rise before you'd reconsider where you now live?

Leave us your thoughts in the Comments below.

[The Age via TreeHugger; photos of Kibera slum by Chrissy Olson]

+++++++++++

Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.





 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (11)
  1. I agree totally! Unfortunatley I sell tires...but I am also a neotraditionalist and have been saying this for years now. Another saving grace could be high speed commuter trains. St. Louis has one but noone rides it......
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. Housing values in exurbs are declining because too many folks live too far from work. That should've been predictable during the housing boom.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. I have to agree with John Voelcker. High MPG and plug-in cars will take the edge off high fuel prices and people will continue as usual.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. Slums are usually crowded, so how will the suburbs become even more populated if no one wants to live there?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. As a city planner in California, I have heard this argument about the "end of suburbia" for the last twenty years. However, the author forgets one of the most significant influences on sprawl: Given the choice, the vast majority of people prefer to live in single family homes. (The number of hip urbanistas that move back into city centers is a fraction of those who buy in the suburbs.)
    Instead of becoming slums, suburbs will evolve. Town centers with retail and entertainment amenities are already being built among the subdivisions of homes and condos. The long commute into the old downtown will become a short commute into the new downtown.
    As always, people's greatest fears for the future result from assuming the the past will just continue forward unchanged. In doing so, we fail to consider the capacity that human beings have to be inventive in unpredictable ways. The suburbs of the 20th century may just not be recognizable to us in fifty years, but don't count them out entirely.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. As a city planner in California, I have heard this argument about the "end of suburbia" for the last twenty years. However, the author forgets one of the most significant influences on sprawl: Given the choice, the vast majority of people prefer to live in single family homes. (The number of hip urbanistas that move back into city centers is a fraction of those who buy in the suburbs.)
    Instead of becoming slums, suburbs will evolve. Town centers with retail and entertainment amenities are already being built among the subdivisions of homes and condos. The long commute into the old downtown will become a short commute into the new downtown.
    As always, people's greatest fears for the future result from assuming the the past will just continue forward unchanged. In doing so, we fail to consider the capacity that human beings have to be inventive in unpredictable ways. The suburbs of the 20th century may just not be recognizable to us in fifty years, but don't count them out entirely.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  7. Sad to say, most people don’t do the math to fully appreciate the costs of their commutes with respect to vehicle wear, fuel, and time. Then there are costs that are much more difficult to calculate, such as the lost time with family. Commuting is time that does have a cost, but the pain in the wallet is the easy part. The lost opportunities (dare we say “opportunity cost”) are much more difficult to evaluate, but have very real implications.
    I agree that poor planning laws at the root of the problem. However, for it to be any otherwise would be un-American. We don’t like being told what to do. Moreover, no politician can get elected with a platform listing stricter planning laws, standards, etc. Besides, the time needed for any real improvements is more than two consecutive terms. So in a world of limited resources, are we willing to compromise our American life style?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  8. Nowadays fuel price is the big issue I agree with that but there is a solutions like solar power car and electric power cars.
    Windy Johnson
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  9. I work in Vancouver Canada, one bedroom apartment $500,000 3 bedroom home over a million dollars. So I live in the burbs. If I work there I would take a 50% pay cut.Burbs pay 22.50/hr Vancouver pays 42/hr. So I pay the 400/month ( 4800 annually) Like to by a volt because its an extended range vehicle. I don't buy foreign name plates, as I would rather keep my money supporting our products.I don't care if someone foreign company is assembling their product here to get the " Made in USA/Canada badge since they only require something like %20 percent of our product to get the badge.Gas would have to double at today's current rate or even triple before I would consider job location. Some needs to keep our money here, It sure is not people buying imported product.From those small purchases at "Dollar days" to Large trucks, it all cost us money buy foreign products.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  10. Cities are good for the economy too. In cities big box corporate stores can't dominate and small businesses are the norm, which is better for the economy because it's more diverse in it's representation as supposed to having walmart, target, etc controlling the entire the retail sector.
    It's also sad that the majority of Americans seem to hate cities and yet have never visited, let alone lived in a proper city. We should send all Americans to live in places like Munich for a period and introduce them to proper city life.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  11. I agree with "Third CTS" - high density urban living is noisy, and high rises are stuffy and require A/C even in mild weather. Not ideal for families. The burbs will never be slums as long as they are the preferred choice.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Advertisement

Find Green Cars

Go!

Advertisement

 
© 2013 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC.