2013 Ford Escape 2.0-Liter EcoBoost: Gas...
2013 Dodge Dart Limited: Gas-Mileage Drive...
Gasoline, Diesel, Hybrids And Plug-Ins: The...
Americans rarely think much about zoning, but it governs almost every facet of how we live our lives.
And unintended consequences of 50-year-old zoning codes may be about to turn some of our loveliest and quietest suburbs into the next slums.
Why? Simply because they've been built too far away from everything else, and we won't be able to afford the gasoline it takes to go to and fro.
Suburbs: slums of the future?
At least, that's the provocative conclusion of Peter Newman, one of the authors of a study released by the Planning Institute of Australia late last year.
The study looks at the future of suburban Australia, which has evolved in patterns very much like suburban America: sprawling, low-density, auto-dependent residential enclaves miles away from commercial areas and office parks.
"Urban sprawl is finished," Newman told The Age. "If we continue to roll out new land releases and suburbs that are car-dependent, they will become the slums of the future.''
Homes vs stores vs offices & factories
Following World War II, with the rise of affordable automobiles, cheap fuel, and an increasingly affluent society, the brand-new suburban house on its own half- or full-acre plot was the American dream.
Zoning codes adopted in the U.S. isolated residences from any commercial and industrial activities, often in curving cul-de-sacs sans sidewalks. Many developments could be entered only from a single point off high-speed arterial roads.
No longer could you send the kid to the corner store on his bike to pick up a gallon of milk.
That corner store became a big-box chain store up to 10 miles away, and public transportation was ignored as a relic of decaying central cities.
Will cheap gasoline end?
That worked fine as long as gasoline remained cheap. With the greater difficulty of extracting and refining hydrocarbon-based fuels, not to mention unrest in oil-producing countries, we may be entering a future of permanently pricier gasoline.
For those trapped in "affordable" suburban homes 50 miles or more from their jobs, the theory goes, there will be few options other than more fuel-efficient vehicles. The value of the homes will decline and the neighborhoods will decay.
We're not entirely convinced by Newman's prediction. More stringent corporate average fuel-economy laws are improving the average gas mileage of all vehicles. U.S. gasoline consumption actually peaked in 2006, and will likely fall more in coming years.
Households can switch to more fuel-efficient cars, and some level of telecommuting holds promise as well. Still, the housing market ruthlessly adjusts the value of all residences in real time.
Just too far away
This was evident in a late-2008 visit to California's High Desert, the very furthest reach of exurban development. The area had seen huge waves of "affordable" town houses and starter homes for buyers priced out of Los Angeles.
Located 90 miles from central LA, the area was simply too far from most jobs. When gasoline prices spiked in 2008, half-built condos were abandoned, fully-built developments stayed empty, and developers walked away.
Plug-ins offer hope
One ray of hope may be plug-in cars: The cost of driving a mile on grid electricity is one-fifth to one-half the cost of driving the same mile on $4-per-gallon gasoline in a 25-mpg vehicle. They're pricey today, but they'll get cheaper over time.
Unfortunately, the elected representatives of suburban enclaves are historically many of the same ones who have consistently voted against Federal funding for development and rollout of plug-in vehicles--which could come to be viewed as sacrificing long-term salvation for short-term convenience.
While the complete Australian study is only available online to members of the Planning Institute, we might recommend such works as James Howard Kunstler's The Geography of Nowhere: The Rise and Decline of America's Man-Made Landscape.
Meanwhile, consider this question: How high would a gallon of gas have to rise before you'd reconsider where you now live?
Leave us your thoughts in the Comments below.
[The Age via TreeHugger; photos of Kibera slum by Chrissy Olson]
+++++++++++
Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.
Have an opinion?
Chris Posted: 3/18/2011 12:52pm PDT
JKD Posted: 3/18/2011 5:30pm PDT
Third CTS Posted: 3/18/2011 11:53pm PDT
Instead of becoming slums, suburbs will evolve. Town centers with retail and entertainment amenities are already being built among the subdivisions of homes and condos. The long commute into the old downtown will become a short commute into the new downtown.
As always, people's greatest fears for the future result from assuming the the past will just continue forward unchanged. In doing so, we fail to consider the capacity that human beings have to be inventive in unpredictable ways. The suburbs of the 20th century may just not be recognizable to us in fifty years, but don't count them out entirely.
Third CTS Posted: 3/18/2011 11:54pm PDT
Instead of becoming slums, suburbs will evolve. Town centers with retail and entertainment amenities are already being built among the subdivisions of homes and condos. The long commute into the old downtown will become a short commute into the new downtown.
As always, people's greatest fears for the future result from assuming the the past will just continue forward unchanged. In doing so, we fail to consider the capacity that human beings have to be inventive in unpredictable ways. The suburbs of the 20th century may just not be recognizable to us in fifty years, but don't count them out entirely.
Gabor Posted: 3/19/2011 12:43am PDT
I agree that poor planning laws at the root of the problem. However, for it to be any otherwise would be un-American. We don’t like being told what to do. Moreover, no politician can get elected with a platform listing stricter planning laws, standards, etc. Besides, the time needed for any real improvements is more than two consecutive terms. So in a world of limited resources, are we willing to compromise our American life style?
Windy Johnson
reckles1 Posted: 3/19/2011 8:49am PDT
chris Posted: 3/20/2011 5:52am PDT
It's also sad that the majority of Americans seem to hate cities and yet have never visited, let alone lived in a proper city. We should send all Americans to live in places like Munich for a period and introduce them to proper city life.
David Posted: 3/20/2011 8:46pm PDT
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!