Advertisement

House Vote Blocks Gas With E15 Ethanol; Will Senate Follow?

Follow John

Corn Ethanol Pump

Corn Ethanol Pump

Enlarge Photo

The latest episode in the long-running drama over whether U.S. drivers will be offered gasoline with more ethanol in it came very early Saturday morning.

The House of Representatives adopted an amendment to a continuing resolution on Federal spending through September 30 that would bar the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from acting on its plan to permit distribution and sale of gasoline with up to 15 percent ethanol, known as E15.

The measure now goes to the Senate, where ethanol enjoys more support. A compromise continuing resolution must be passed by March 4 to avoid a shutdown of the Federal government.

Sort of bipartisan

The amendment, proposed by Representative John Sullivan (R-OK), was passed 286 to 135. Its support was somewhat bipartisan, with 206 Republicans and 79 Democrats supporting it, and 31 Republicans and 105 Democrats against.

The amendment bars the EPA from spending any money allocated this fiscal year to implement the terms of what was called its E15 waiver. Sullivan maintained that the EPA "completely ignored calls from lawmakers, industry, environmental and consumer groups" to address "important safety issues" related to E15.

No pumps or storage tanks either

A separate amendment, offered by Representative Jeff Flake (R-AZ), blocked funds for a tax subsidy that supported building fuel pumps that blend ethanol and gasoline, as well as separate storage facilities. It too was passed by the House.

Trade groups representing the ethanol industry and some agricultural interests issued furious denunciations. The CEO of Growth Energy, one such group, said of E15, "No other fuel mix has been tested more," and that the EPA waiver was based on "a more exhaustive study and collection of data" than 11 previous petitions that had been approved.

Congress mandated ethanol, mind you

The Representatives who approved the amendment did so while ignoring the Congressional role in requiring extensive use of ethanol for vehicle fuel.Under the 2007 Energy Independence and Security Act, the U.S. must use 11.1 billion gallons of ethanol in 2010, rising to 36 billion by 2022.

FlexFuel badge on E85-capable 2009 Chevrolet HHR

FlexFuel badge on E85-capable 2009 Chevrolet HHR

Enlarge Photo

Industry observers have consistently suggested that production of such a high volume of ethanol may not even be possible, whether or not it may be good policy.

E85, the fuel that has 85 percent ethanol, seems unlikely to spread widely--let alone whether there are sufficient numbers of flex-fuel vehicles on the roads to use it. Instead, ethanol percentages in standard "gasoline" may rise, perhaps even beyond E15 to E20.

One drawback to higher percentages of ethanol is lower fuel efficiency, since a gallon of ethanol holds roughly 20 percent less energy content than a gallon of gasoline.

E85 station in Los Angeles

E85 station in Los Angeles

Enlarge Photo

Lawsuits aplenty

Exactly one month ago, the EPA had proposed to allow use of E15 in cars from model years 2001 through 2006, after having approved E15 gasoline for 2007 or newer cars back in October.

Following that first approval, a coalition that included every major carmaker launched a lawsuit asking that the first approval be overturned. That suit, filed in December, remains underway.

The plaintiffs, also including companies that make and sell other types of small engines, are nervous that damage that will occur when the new fuel is used in engines that weren't designed for it--and consumers will blame them.

[Detroit News, Diesel Progress]

Advertisement
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (6)
  1. Unless your vehicle carries the FlexFuel logo, using this stuff will do bad things to the inside of your engine. It is also much more expensive because it contains less energy per gallon so it imposes penalties at so many levels.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. @Jaybird2005: Actually, the "FlexFuel" logo is meant to indicate vehicles that can run on E85, which is fully 85 percent ethanol. The E15 (15% ethanol) that is being discussed here may or may not harm engines of the 2001-present vehicles the EPA is proposing for it. The data differ, as discussed in the article above.
    Automakers say it may/will damage engines:
    http://www.greencarreports.com/blog/1044861_more-ethanol-in-gasoline-bad-for-existing-cars-say-automakers
    A study by engineering consultant Ricardo, on the other hand, says any damage at all will be minimal:
    http://www.greencarreports.com/blog/1049385_more-ethanol-in-gasoline-minimal-risk-to-old-cars-study-says
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. The marine industry are also very worried about the safety of this fuel as it is extremely hygroscopic, marine vessels have reported becoming stranded in the sea because of water in the gasoline.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. This was a payout to the farming industry. There is little economic/environmental benefit to Ethanol fuel (some even argue a detriment). It was put in place to create a new market for corn...and we allowed it to happen. It is time to get rid of this economic BS.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. Is corn fuel ethanol corporate welfare for Big oil and Government motors? Some folks think so.
    Get food out of my gas, ethanol stinks.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. Does corn fuel ethanol affect the beef?
    Some folks think so.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion? Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Advertisement

Find Green Cars

Go!

Advertisement

 
© 2014 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback. Stock photography by izmo, Inc.