New Nickel-Lithium Battery Has Ultra-High Energy Density

 

New Li-Ni Battery In An Energy Density Comparison

New Li-Ni Battery In An Energy Density Comparison

Enlarge Photo

Researchers at Japan’s National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST) have succeeded in making the world’s first Ni-Li battery, a formulation that holds more than 3.5 times the energy of Li-ion batteries and doesn’t run the risk of catching fire.

By including a membrane made of the recently developed glass-ceramic film called LISICON between two otherwise incompatible electrode materials, each electrode can be bathed in its own substance-specific liquid electrolyte solution which is at the same time prevented from coming into direct contact with the other.   Thanks to the unique properties of LISICON, the separated electrolyte solutions are readily able to pass electrons across the membrane, and so the entire unit still functions as an operational cell.

Reasoning that by combining the best properties of NiMH batteries with those of a Li-ion battery they could obtain an “ultrahigh” energy density, the researchers placed a nickel hydroxide cathode in a liquid electrolyte and the lithium metal anode in an organic electrolyte separated by the LISICON glass, and Eureka!   The World's first Li-Ni battery was born!

The new cell has already obtained a “practical energy density” of about 194 watt hours per pound of battery material, or 3.5 times the density of a typical Li-ion battery (at about 55 watt hours of energy per pound of battery).

Using the Tesla Roadster for comparison purposes,  the car's current Li-Ion battery which weighs 1000 pounds and contains 53 KWh of energy,  can propel the car about 200 miles in normal use.  By contrast the same weight of Ni-Li battery would hold 194 KWh of energy for a range of approximately 700 miles!

The implications for electric vehicle design and adoption are obviously tremendous, but several issues need to be overcome to bring this technology to market.

For instance, recharge time for such a battery on standard U.S. household current would be several days.  And the cell itself is structurally more complex than current cells,  no doubt making it more expensive to manufacture.   Additionally,  the Lisicon glass barrier is an unknown in terms of long-term durability.  A cell design would need to be produced that preserves this membrane for the life of the battery.

Nevertheless, in comparison to the hurdles to commercialization faced by other Super-battery and/or capacitor technologies, these issues seem relatively straight forward; In the race for the elusive EV energy-storage breakthrough, the Ni-Li battery may have suddenly moved to the pole position.

[SOURCE: gas2.0]





 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
Comments (10)
  1. Was there any prediction of battery life, especially at the high recharge rates that customers will eventually want? How much power can this battery charge / discharge and still maintain a long life?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. "194 watt hours per pound"
    I can't recall ever seeing Wh/lb used as units before. That's about 425 Wh/kg. Pretty good, but I wonder if this is another theoretical energy calculation never to be achieved in a real product.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. I love the idea of a 550lb battery that will go 400 miles. Even if it won't fully charge from empty overnight, I can still make my 160 mile per day commute with plenty of spare miles remaining. If I charge at home and work even on 110 volts, I eventually will keep it in the upper half of charge. Even if I forget to charge one night (Rare for cell phone) I can still make it to work and charge there, and I believe i'm on the extreme mileage end of things. (Don't think this is tempoary either, it's been five years!)
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. This could be a game changer or more vapor ware like EEstor. Only time will tell.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. The good news is that people are coming up with different ideas for energy storage for electric cars. I am confident that one or more will work in the near future. While I have given up on Eestor, I have high hopes for the CNT battery which is scheduled for debut on November 18.
    I think that progress on electric cars is so rapid that hybrids are obsolescent.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. No mention about POWER density; I heard it's impossible to keep both energy and power density high in a battery, so I'm wondering what an expectable 0-60mph performance in a demo vehicle would be... 20 secs???
    Anyway, kudos for the researchers, I really appreciate their efforts.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  7. Good point on the power density. Perhaps someone will design a "hybrid" battery; one portion will have high power density, while the other portion has high energy density. The high energy density could trickle its energy to the high power portion which the engine would draw from for fast acceleration.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  8. @ Jacksunny's "POWER density" comment.
    Fear not, if you can get the energy density high enough, you spare yourself some mass to use a supercapacitor in conjunction with the battery. This alleviates the need for sudden, rapid power delivery somewhat, as the SC can provide surge power for accelleration, and be replenished from the (lower PD) battery between high-demand use.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  9. it doesn't only have to be used by an automobile - this technology could provide the deep-cycle storage to allow homes to capture renewable energy from PV. for an open-source project that's working on this, take a look at: http://www.solarnetwork.net/
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  10. @Jacksunny.... The Telsa Model S, which uses this battery technology, will do 0-60 in 6.5 seconds.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Find Green Cars

Go!


 
© 2011 Green Car Reports. All Rights Reserved. Green Car Reports is published by High Gear Media. Send us feedback.
 

Use the form below to send us a tip, give us feedback, or just say hello.

(max 750 characters)